Lots more teen pregnancy and stds.I'm not asking really about the practicality of it, about how it would be effectively banned. I'm more asking what you think the general outcome would be.
I'm not asking really about the practicality of it, about how it would be effectively banned. I'm more asking what you think the general outcome would be.
Lots more teen pregnancy and stds.
We don't have to guess. We can look at nations that have comprehensive sex ed, where STI rates are low, and run that in reverse.
And here's a sobering thought: Opponents of comprehensive sex ed are generally opposed to kids learning about consent.
I'd be interested to see if there was any way to study what outcomes were like before comprehensive sex ed.
On the other hand, even if that yielded less promiscuity, the culture was far different then.
You don't have to. Just study history and learn about child marriages and spousal rape.
I voted UNSURE but I believe the results will be wildly varied and inconclusive.
Hey I am all for doing the ban, today and follow it with a Nationwide statistical tracking and research project, the biggest ever, that would not only track what America had lost by banning Sex Ed specifically to that area but also cataloguing unforeseen societal changes outside uneducated sex.
But I'd say those aren't strictly related to sex ed. Those are more moral issues than teaching kids about the nature of sexuality.
I think the number of teens having sex, number of partners and frequency( promiscuity) will stay basically the same, but the negative impact of it on everyone's lives will be exponentially greater. I cannot imagine a more blatantly immoral act for public schools, than refusing to educate students about their own sexuality.I'm not asking really about the practicality of it, about how it would be effectively banned. I'm more asking what you think the general outcome would be.
Thoughtful. Thanks.
more promiscuity, teen pregnancy and std transmissionsI'm not asking really about the practicality of it, about how it would be effectively banned. I'm more asking what you think the general outcome would be.
We would be far better served by having a fully comprehensive sex ed, and then tracking results.I voted UNSURE but I believe the results will be wildly varied and inconclusive.
Hey I am all for doing the ban, today and follow it with a Nationwide statistical tracking and research project, the biggest ever, that would not only track what America had lost by banning Sex Ed specifically to that area but also cataloguing unforeseen societal changes outside uneducated sex.
Little to nothing.I'm not asking really about the practicality of it, about how it would be effectively banned. I'm more asking what you think the general outcome would be.
I didn't vote as it begs to question why sex education was even necessary to begin with. Like maybe it's not such good idea to have children go explore on their own just for starters.
But I'd say those aren't strictly related to sex ed. Those are more moral issues than teaching kids about the nature of sexuality.
The reason we have sex ed, is largely because they didn't. And many won't again, but don't despair there is always an older cousin, and some internet sites to help fill the voidVoted" Unsure
If sex ed was banned in k-12 it would mean the parents would have to step up.
What a concept, parents teaching their kids about relationships and sex.
Things that my parents did for me back in the 50's.
I'm not asking really about the practicality of it, about how it would be effectively banned. I'm more asking what you think the general outcome would be.