To start, I'm not inculcated in the "philosophy" of MAGA. I base my views on the expressions in public discourse, particularly on DP. I'm fervently anti-MAGA on that basis. I'm also a long-time student of fascism and authoritarian movements. Because of that, I've long considered MAGA as just a fascist movement. Indeed, I'm aware of no evidence to refute that. So, I'm starting a thread to entertain arguments to the contrary.
Be advised, however, that claims must be based upon substance, not unsupported conclusory statements. And they are subject to substantive challenge. I'd like to keep this thread out of the basement, so keep your commentary upstairs-worthy.
Hmmm...so from what I can glean from most folks who describe themselves as MAGA, I can only find the following that links it to other past fascist movements:
1. It relies on a cult of personality around an infallible* leader Donald Trump who cannot fail and has never failed, but when his policies do not succeed, must have been betrayed by internal saboteurs.
2. That it is openly nationalistic, i.e. "America First", and viewing our nation's relations with other countries as a zero-sum competitive game in which there are no mutually-beneficial relationships, only winners and losers.
3. It is openly anti-empiricist, and sneers at scientific consensus (and the scientific method) and academics in general, replacing respected experts with quacks and idiots.
4. It seeks to establish either autarky (where everything is produced in our country) or at the very least, for the things we cannot produce ourselves, to dominate those countries who do through threat of economic or even military sanction.
5. It is openly expansionistic, with claims of needing to re-take old or new territory, constantly repeating our claims to Panama, Canada and Greenland.
6. It is openly lawless, relying on executive power and flouting rule of law as expressed by open defiance of Court orders up to and including the Supreme Court's.
7. It is anti-democratic, not merely casting doubt on the legitimacy of elections that do not go their way, but simply using extra-legal means to overturn elections that do not go their way up to and including violence.
8. It relies on a threatening legal apparatus/prerogative state to quash dissent.
It checks enough of
Umberto Eco's 14 points of Fascism to be considered a Fascist movement.
HOWEVER, all that having been accounted for, you are forgetting one major thing that totally disproves it to be a fascist movement, NWRatCon: If it
were a fascist movement, doubtless every red-blooded American conservative and libertarian both here on Debate Politics and in the country at large would roundly condemn MAGA and would fight against it. But because they have not, it cannot be a fascist movement. So your assessment just amounts to liberal hysteria, or something. QED.