- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
- Messages
- 8,211
- Reaction score
- 4,179
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Did not know that. My Cato addition uses the "u". Which did the original version use?
I believe the original was "unalienable" but I find the word "inalienable" to be less awkward, however both forms are acceptable.
I would say that we can only apply them where the person in question falls under our jurisdiction, not just American Citizens. Otherwise, we could prosecute non-citizens for certain speech and whatnot.
Good catch. You are correct. This is a more accurate interpretation of what I was trying to communicate.