What made Charlie Kirk a great man?

[CLAX1911]

Mr. Kirk was openly critical of gays and transgenders.
He said "stoning gays was gods perfect law."

He found folks with your sexual proclivities to be "immoral".
Look below for a full, uncut debate where he says unequivocally your kind are immoral.

So? I disagree

Yet, you still advocate for him.

Because disagreement isn't hatred the sooner you get that the better.

How can you support him?

Support him how?

I mean, who hurt you?

I'm hurt because I didn't think someone who disagrees with me is an evil fascist Nazi devil?

13K views · 1.3K reactions | Charlie Kirk: “god’s perfect law says gay people should be stoned to death” | Steve Peña

Charlie Kirk: “god’s perfect law says gay people should be stoned to death”.

www.google.com

 

[CLAX1911]

If that makes you feel better I’m fine with it.

Then why are you instant blaming me?

You clearly didn’t understand what I asked and then turned on the usual clax show consisting of whatever that was.

still blaming me.

 

[reinaert]

Well sure.

The fact that divisive language can be a contributing factor in an attack on that person doesnt seem controversial to me.

It may not be controversial to you, but there isn't enough information available to allow for affirmation.

Nor is acknowledging the fact that such things can be a contributing factor a justification of the attack.

The contributing factors are a shooter, a weapon, a skill set, opportunity, intent, will and execution.

Everything else is guess, projection or surmisal.

 

[rahl]

But of course you need to back up tour claim.

It’s so funny when you lie and dishonestly edit my post

Here’s what I actually said……

Don’t need to. You need to provide the entire transcript, not just a sound bite.

 

[Plasmaball]

HE has never insulted blacks or jews.
Again, if you think that, then you are applying your own bias against something he said that is factual.
And facts, are never racist.

Lol..what kind of bullshit lies is this?
He directly insulted them numerous times.

 

[NolanVoyd]

It may not be controversial to you, but there isn't enough information available to allow for affirmation.

Sure there is. We know the killer didnt like kirk not for personal reasons, for whar he said) and had discussed it recently

The contributing factors are a shooter, a weapon, a skill set, opportunity, intent, will and execution.

You left out motive

He had a problem with kirk based on things kirk said.

Everything else is guess, projection or surmisal.

Not really.

 

[Plasmaball]

Says the side who doesn't want to get rid of high crime and would rather have blacks killed at a disproportional rate than their population percentage.

Wow this is just weak..

How embarrassing

 

[NolanVoyd]

You need to provide the entire transcript, not just a sound bite.

Nonsense.

People quote other people constantly. Providing the entire transcript for every quote would be tedious and unnecessary.

If you think the quotes arent accurate, refute them.

 

[rahl]

Nonsense.

lol

People quote other people constantly. Providing the entire transcript for every quote would be tedious and unnecessary.

If you think the quotes arent accurate, refute them.

I did. Provide the entire quote in context. Not just a moronic sound bite. There is a reason why you keep running away when challenged on this.

 

[ttwtt78640]

HE has never insulted blacks or jews.
Again, if you think that, then you are applying your own bias against something he said that is factual.
And facts, are never racist.

Hmm…

Charlie Kirk goes on unhinged racist rant: "Prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people -- that’s a fact"

www.mediamatters.org

How Charlie Kirk Plans to Discredit Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Act

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk is preparing to launch a campaign against Martin Luther King Jr. and the landmark civil rights law he helped enact.

www.wired.com

Charlie Kirk once said passing the Civil Rights Act was a 'huge mistake'

The conservative activist's quote about the landmark legislation circulated online after he was fatally shot in September 2025.

www.snopes.com

Kirk "Jewish donors have a lot of explaining to do" | Media Matters for America

www.mediamatters.org

 

[vesper]

The left are so quick to call people ignorant when you don't believe what they do. HOW do you ever learn if you don't ask questions and challenge other's way of thinking?

Exactly! Have a great evening Queen Margo!

 

[TangoNoCash]

Then why are you instant blaming me?

still blaming me.

You’re right. I am to blame for talking up conversations with you. I’ll fix that.

 

[NolanVoyd]

I did.

No.

You didnt.

 

[Fletch]

One of the biggest mistakes on the left is concluding it to be hate to challenge young kids why they believe as they do, is not hate. It is an exercise in critical thinking. Something truly lacking on this forum and in pockets of our society.
Hate would be the one who put the bullet in Kirk that took his life.

Yet to many on the left, the assassin is the hero.

 

[reinaert]

Sure there is. We know the killer didnt like kirk not for personal reasons, for whar he said) and had discussed it recently

That's not Kirk contributing. That's the killer choosing.

You left out motive

It doesn't have anything to do with Kirk.

He had a problem with kirk based on things kirk said.

Does a woman calling her husband a ****-faced small dicked little ***** poof boy explain him breaking her nose?

Not really.

But, yes. We don't have anywhere near enough information.

 

[Fletch]

Lol..what kind of bullshit lies is this?
He directly insulted them numerous times.

Give me two examples of each.

 

[vesper]

Hmm…

Charlie Kirk goes on unhinged racist rant: "Prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people -- that’s a fact"

www.mediamatters.org

Charlie Kirk once said passing the Civil Rights Act was a 'huge mistake'

The conservative activist's quote about the landmark legislation circulated online after he was fatally shot in September 2025.

www.snopes.com

Kirk "Jewish donors have a lot of explaining to do" | Media Matters for America

www.mediamatters.org

That conversation was calling out DEI. Those mentioned by name were big advocates for DEI. They all happened to be black. That does not make it racist. Media Matters Ttwit? Really?

 

[rahl]

No.

You didnt.

It’s so funny when you have to lie and edit my posts. Watching you flail about and deflect is ****ing hilarious

Here’s when actually said……

I did. Provide the entire quote in context. Not just a moronic sound bite. There is a reason why you keep running away when challenged on this.

 

[Plasmaball]

Give me two examples of each.

No.

 

[CLAX1911]

You’re right.

As usual

I am to blame for talking up conversations with you. I’ll fix that.

K bye

 

[vesper]

Yet to many on the left, the assassin is the hero.

That's scary. Reminds me of the left praising Luigi Mangione

 

[NolanVoyd]

That's not Kirk contributing. That's the killer choosing.

This is the point we are discussing.

"But his hateful rhetoric definitely contributed to him being a dead man."

The killer was clearly motivated by Kirks rhetoric.

It doesn't have anything to do with Kirk.

I Disagree. Kirks rhetoric has everything to do with kirk.

Does a woman calling her husband a ****-faced small dicked little ***** poof boy explain him breaking her nose?

You are conflating "explaining" with "justifying".

Calling somone names doesnt justify a broken nose but it is part of the explanation.

But, yes. We don't have anywhere near enough information.

We know he was motivated by a dislike of Kirk. We know that was based on kirks rhetoric, not a personal or business dispute.

 

[Fletch]

No.

Cool. Then there is no reason to believe your post #255 is anything other than bullshit.

 

[----------]

My point was to offer you quotes from TACO showing how he considered Kirk "great" because you said you hadnt seen them. It's clear now tho, right?

That's not a "point". You don't seem to have a point. Maybe you have nothing better to do?

Opinions! I think you're getting it. The OP didnt mention right and wrong...but asked people to quote/explain why they felt he was deserving of such honor. (Only one person has so far.)

Oh I think YOU are getting it. A "great man" tag largely relies on one's personal opinion, which the OP wasn't willing to share.

If you dont think he's great or deserving of such honors, you wouldnt be the person he's asking, right?

That's why I was trying to establish what his definition of what a great man was, so that I could answer him accordingly. Savvy?

Where have I posted anything resembling hate in my posts to you? Quote it or just admit you are scrambling to hide behind a personal attack.

Who said that about you? Me thinks you are being a little paranoid perhaps.

No need for you to participate then.

It's not for you to say when I can or cannot participate.

But TACO is wasting a lot of rhetoric and taxpayer $$ on someone "irrelevant," wouldnt you agree?

No.

 

[CLAX1911]

That's scary. Reminds me of the left praising Luigi Mangione

The left throughout history has always been violent.