• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is the last big thing the gop has done to help the average working american have a better life?

Depending on the bill, it most certainly is.
nah, it means to ask, if the Republicans proposed and passed legislature of any value, surely you guys can think of something that they stand for, something they made happen, instead of opposing something. the op was asking what did the GOP do, not what did they prevent. Surely there is something more than just getting in the way and owning the libs that you could remind us of, that the GOP actually started and finished something people can use.
 
What was the last big thing the gop passed with the approval of the majority of american people that helped americans? Like the infrastructure bill that was just passed. Oddly enough that was another thing most of the gop leadership was against that their base was for.

The last thing I can recall is nixon creating the epa. Sadly his party no longer believes in regulations on business.
$1 trillion was repatriated into our economy with Trump policy.
 
nah, it means to ask, if the Republicans proposed and passed legislature of any value, surely you guys can think of something that they stand for, something they made happen, instead of opposing something. the op was asking what did the GOP do, not what did they prevent. Surely there is something more than just getting in the way and owning the libs that you could remind us of, that the GOP actually started and finished something people can use.

^^ Liberals demand answers and then dismiss them. This is why they can't be reasoned with.

They will shop for alternative facts until it agrees with them. They are all dishonest brokers. Never trust a liberal.
 
OP got the answer right, but a related question is what Republican voters THINK the voters did for them. That's a much longer answer.

That's where 'culture war' and pandering come in, and the party has hugely been about being anti-Democrat, so Republicans think the party has protected them from socialism and communism, from black people, from gay people, from Muslim terrorists and Sharia law whatever that is, from high taxes, from transgender people in their childrens' bathrooms, from mask tyranny, from being conquered, from big government, and much more.
 
You're under the impression that the "infrastructure bill" (how much of it actually goes to infrastructure?) is going to help anyone, especially with dumping more money into the market in the middle of significant inflation.

Money doesn't have to be printed by the fed and filtered through the private banks, it can be spent in to existence. The trillions in Trump tax cuts were, indeed, stupid and did nothing to address inflation, the debt or the GOP's reputation for thievery. However, spending money on the nation, with projects that puts money into the hands of real, working people, is a far sight better than any GOP program of the last 40 years. Joe is, finally, taking a trickle up view of economics and it WILL mitigate some inflation by making the workers wealthier.

Get with the program! The fascist economic instincts of conservatives have destroyed enough of this nation's potential to be met with mockery from this day forward. You guys have ****ed it up royally and now it's time to take a different course, a SMARTER, MORE MORAL course.

Buckle up, fascists! The trickle is changing directions.
 
The trillions in Trump tax cuts were, indeed, stupid and did nothing to address inflation, the debt or the GOP's reputation for thievery.

I'd just like to discuss this phrase.

A Republican point of view is, "that's not thievery. It's Democrats committing thievery trying to tax the money, this is just people wanting to keep their own money and not have it stolen by the government!"

They're wrong, of course, and despite it being very unlikely, let's see if any can learn why.

But first, they're not entirely wrong. Their simplistic idea of a horde of Democrats creating overly high taxation just in order to grab money and give it to themselves is theoretically possible. It has about nothing to do with the real situation, but it could happen, so let's admit that.

Let's instead use an analogy. Let's say that in your neighborhood, the city provides services, and pick the library as an example, but we'll treat it as an expensive library or recognize it represents many services.

So everyone pays city taxes to pay for those services. But then the people in the nicest house on your block throw some nice fundraising parties for the city government, and the next thing you know, the city starts passing tax reductions over and over that only apply to the richest neighbors.

And so the people in the nicest house are paying a lower rate of taxes than anyone else, and either the city starts cutting services, or having a big public debt you owe part of. Meanwhile, the richest house just enjoys having more and more money, and starts buying and renting more houses in the neighborhood.

You complain. They're not paying their fair share! It's thievery how they're getting their taxes cut so much! You're told, they're just trying to keep their own money, no thievery.

And this exposes the fallacy, the lie, in the Republican position.

They want to pretend that 'taxation is thievery', there are no 'public expenses' justifying taxes. But contrary to their ideology, there are public expenses, and taxes are legitimately owed for them. Not everyone has to agree on every expense. Maybe some want library expansions and others want its budget cut; the majority rules and the minority has to abide.

This is that basic Republican fallacy, to cheer all tax cuts and especially the ones that actually happen, tax cuts for the rich, no matter the impact on the country, no matter the increases of our debt, no matter the 'fairness' of taxation shares, no matter the rise in inequality. To pretend that all tax cuts for the rich are right and harmless and wonderful.

It's largely an effect of Republican propaganda, always telling people that government is bad, harmful, wasteful, too big; and again, they COULD be right sometimes. Government certainly isn't perfect, and in theory it could be a bloated, corrupt, disaster, but it's generally not now. But Republicans always act like it is.

But this should help people understand why Republicans generally are wrongly loving tax cuts for the rich.
 
Last edited:
^^ Liberals demand answers and then dismiss them. This is why they can't be reasoned with.

They will shop for alternative facts until it agrees with them. They are all dishonest brokers. Never trust a liberal.
First, the post after that one is where I saw the list that you posted and I said fine by me. But what is all this drivel?
"Demands" is an exaggeration. dismiss is also, who's shopping? I don't even get what you're talking about or how that answer makes sense with what I posted.
 
What was the last big thing the gop passed with the approval of the majority of american people that helped americans?
I can tell you what the next big thing will be - to vote Democrats out of office next year.
 
I can tell you what the next big thing will be - to vote Democrats out of office next year.
And that will help the majority of american people? If that's the big thing, the gop is very small minded.
 
When Eisenhower put the interstate highway throughout America .......... this was absolutely wonderful
when traveling between concerts then getting back to school. Concerts were a big help to small town
business people. No question about it. I have praised Dwight D Eisenhower many times in my life time
yet we can't get the GOP to maintain this smart investment.
 
Last edited:
This certainly does not help working class America:

State and Local Austerity = why it’s a problem


Why Do Republicans deliberately crash the US economy?

Be it ideology or stratagem, the GOP has blocked pro-growth policy and backed job-killing austerity

Fact check: Do Republican presidents oversee recessions
https://www.usatoday.com › factcheck › 2020/05/28 › f...

May 28, 2020 — Academics and market historians are trying to figure out why the economy tends to perform less robustly with a Republican president.

The Republicans' debt-ceiling ransom note finally comes into ...
https://www.msnbc.com › rachel-maddow-show › repu...

... "Give us trillions of dollars in spending cuts or we'll crash the economy on purpose." Exactly eight years ago today, Republicans tried ...

https://foreignpolicy.com › 2012/07/23 › how-republican...
Jul 23, 2012 — The nation was trying to climb out of the deepest economic hole since the Great Depression, but the Republican Party had about as scientific an ...


Why Republicans and others concerned about the economy ...
https://theconversation.com › why-republicans-and-oth...
Nov 7, 2020 — Democrats have a better economic track record. In trying to get a sense of what kind of impact the election result will have on the economy, the ...


Republicans would rather destroy the country than ease up on ...
https://www.salon.com › ... › Amanda Marcotte's Articles


Jul 31, 2020 — Republicans were largely responsible for crashing the American economy in 2008 too,
 
I'd just like to discuss this phrase.

A Republican point of view is, "that's not thievery. It's Democrats committing thievery trying to tax the money, this is just people wanting to keep their own money and not have it stolen by the government!"

They're wrong, of course, and despite it being very unlikely, let's see if any can learn why.

But first, they're not entirely wrong. Their simplistic idea of a horde of Democrats creating overly high taxation just in order to grab money and give it to themselves is theoretically possible. It has about nothing to do with the real situation, but it could happen, so let's admit that.

Let's instead use an analogy. Let's say that in your neighborhood, the city provides services, and pick the library as an example, but we'll treat it as an expensive library or recognize it represents many services.

So everyone pays city taxes to pay for those services. But then the people in the nicest house on your block throw some nice fundraising parties for the city government, and the next thing you know, the city starts passing tax reductions over and over that only apply to the richest neighbors.

And so the people in the nicest house are paying a lower rate of taxes than anyone else, and either the city starts cutting services, or having a big public debt you owe part of. Meanwhile, the richest house just enjoys having more and more money, and starts buying and renting more houses in the neighborhood.

You complain. They're not paying their fair share! It's thievery how they're getting their taxes cut so much! You're told, they're just trying to keep their own money, no thievery.

And this exposes the fallacy, the lie, in the Republican position.

They want to pretend that 'taxation is thievery', there are no 'public expenses' justifying taxes. But contrary to their ideology, there are public expenses, and taxes are legitimately owed for them. Not everyone has to agree on every expense. Maybe some want library expansions and others want its budget cut; the majority rules and the minority has to abide.

This is that basic Republican fallacy, to cheer all tax cuts and especially the ones that actually happen, tax cuts for the rich, no matter the impact on the country, no matter the increases of our debt, no matter the 'fairness' of taxation shares, no matter the rise in inequality. To pretend that all tax cuts for the rich are right and harmless and wonderful.

It's largely an effect of Republican propaganda, always telling people that government is bad, harmful, wasteful, too big; and again, they COULD be right sometimes. Government certainly isn't perfect, and in theory it could be a bloated, corrupt, disaster, but it's generally not now. But Republicans always act like it is.

But this should help people understand why Republicans generally are wrongly loving tax cuts for the rich.

I prefer to break down their tax obligation this way:

Markets are created, through government actions, and the rich get more out of it. They use the courts more, have a louder political voice and have more mechanisms of wealth-building available to them.Therefore, their bill to "play" this game is higher.

Also, we must contribute according to our ability. We ask strong young men to die in battle for the nation, because sending little girls and old people would be stupid. We ask the smart to teach because asking retards to do it is absurd. And, we ask the wealthy to pay more, because they HAVE that ability above all others. The whole "fairness" rebuttal some of them use is ridiculous as saying, why don't we ask the handicapped to win the olympic games or, why don't we ask men to do their share of giving birth.

What would fix this problem is if we made their political spending illegal. The majority of voters want them to do their share, not just exploit the system with no obligation to give back.
 
What was the last big thing the gop passed with the approval of the majority of american people that helped americans? Like the infrastructure bill that was just passed. Oddly enough that was another thing most of the gop leadership was against that their base was for.

The last thing I can recall is nixon creating the epa. Sadly his party no longer believes in regulations on business.
To be fair to Tricky Dick, he DID express willingness to work with Ted Kennedy on crafting a national health insurance plan but Ted suffered from "not invented here" syndrome and back out, at which point Nixon decided "Okay then, offer withdrawn" and Ted went on to admit deep regret for not taking Dick Nixon up on the offer.
 
Republicans have done SO MUCH for the average working American!
Why, they even gave us two Santas!!! 😆🎅🎅

The Two Santa Claus Theory is a political theory and strategy published by Wanniski in 1976, which he promoted within the United States Republican Party. The theory states that in democratic elections, if Democrats appeal to voters by proposing programs to help people, then the Republicans cannot gain broader appeal by proposing less spending. The first "Santa Claus" of the theory title refers to the Democrats who promise programs to help the disadvantaged. The "Two Santa Claus Theory" recommends that the Republicans must assume the role of a second Santa Claus by not arguing to cut spending but offering the option of cutting taxes.

According to Wanniski, the theory is simple. In 1976, he wrote that the Two-Santa Claus Theory suggests that "the Republicans should concentrate on tax-rate reduction. As they succeed in expanding incentives to produce, they will move the economy back to full employment and thereby reduce social pressures for public spending. Just as an increase in Government spending inevitably means taxes must be raised, a cut in tax rates—by expanding the private sector—will diminish the relative size of the public sector." Wanniski suggested this position, as Thom Hartmann has clarified, so that the Democrats would "have to be anti-Santas by raising taxes, or anti-Santas by cutting spending. Either one would lose them elections."
 
Money doesn't have to be printed by the fed and filtered through the private banks, it can be spent in to existence. The trillions in Trump tax cuts were, indeed, stupid and did nothing to address inflation, the debt or the GOP's reputation for thievery. However, spending money on the nation, with projects that puts money into the hands of real, working people, is a far sight better than any GOP program of the last 40 years. Joe is, finally, taking a trickle up view of economics and it WILL mitigate some inflation by making the workers wealthier.

Get with the program! The fascist economic instincts of conservatives have destroyed enough of this nation's potential to be met with mockery from this day forward. You guys have ****ed it up royally and now it's time to take a different course, a SMARTER, MORE MORAL course.

Buckle up, fascists! The trickle is changing directions.
You don't know the difference between what tax cuts are and what printing up money out of thin air is? They aren't the same. They aren't even close to the same.
 
You don't know the difference between what tax cuts are and what printing up money out of thin air is? They aren't the same. They aren't even close to the same.

They're the same in the sense that they're the republican way, thus, stupid. The tax cuts just added to the deficit and the "quantitative easing" caused inflation. So, it's a lose-lose.

The Biden, trickle up, philosophy is far superior to either of the Republican ways of doing things because the money spent goes to working people who spend it, not squirl it away in offshore accounts, not gamble it in the stock market and not use it to BRIBE our politicians.
 
They're the same in the sense that they're the republican way, thus, stupid. The tax cuts just added to the deficit and the "quantitative easing" caused inflation. So, it's a lose-lose.

The Biden, trickle up, philosophy is far superior to either of the Republican ways of doing things because the money spent goes to working people who spend it, not squirl it away in offshore accounts, not gamble it in the stock market and not use it to BRIBE our politicians.
Lol...no, they aren't the same. Also, there is no such thing as "trickle up". Even if I accepted such a ridiculous statement, inflation is outpacing all of that trickle, making it a net loss anyways.
 
Lol...no, they aren't the same. Also, there is no such thing as "trickle up". Even if I accepted such a ridiculous statement, inflation is outpacing all of that trickle, making it a net loss anyways.

Laugh it up, you only look foolish. I told you how they are the same, they're both profoundly stupid. And, yes, what I'm calling "trickle up" is just normal, traditional, sane economics. We've been doing it so ass-backwards for so long, people like yourself think it's strange and, incredibly, not even a thing. When Reagan first proposed his fascist system of trickle down, economists correctly called it "voo-doo" economics for a reason. It's trickle-down that's "no such thing". It was and IS elitist bullshit.

As for inflation keeping pace with the trickling, you are again mistaken. The inflation is caused by our trickle-down debt, not our trickle-up spending. We've had to print a bunch of money to devalue our currency and make our debt payable. That's just the GOP ****ing the common man to give tax cuts to billionaires.

When, however, money is SPENT, it is in circulation, not just padding some billionaire's ledgers. The common people who will get the money will spend it again and again and the more money they get, the less the inflation rate will hurt them. Furthermore, the improvements in the infrastructure spending will improve our nation's competitiveness in world markets and will serve as a foundation upon which twenty-first century business can be conducted.

The alternative, the GOP method, contends that a few should be served by the many and the country should stagnate to pay for it. I say the few should feel conspicuously insecure at being "the few".
 
Back
Top Bottom