• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What I feel is the proper handling of marriage.

I tend to piss off both sides of the aisle with my view on this topic. I take a lot more libertarian stance than the militant left wing hate groups and the misguided social conservatives. I am going to do this a little backward. I am going to start with the ending and then give you my reasoning behind my stance.

The Stance: Marriage should not be regulated by any federal, state or local government. This includes licensing to taxes.

The Reason: The big three religions all believe that God created marriage when He joined Adam and Eve. Thus, nearly everyone of religion believes marriage is the first religious ceremony and institution that God created AND performed. To force anyone of any of these religions to recognize any form of marriage outside of their beliefs is a violation of the First Amendment.

The Solution: Wipe the word marriage from all laws and regulations (including the tax code) and replace it with a legal contract that is secular in nature. Allow anyone to enter into a legally binding contract that is domestic in nature and leave the word marriage, the ceremony marriage and the institution marriage to the social constructs (read religions) that wish to adhere to them without persecution and without being forced to recognize a bastardized version of their beliefs as a valid law.
 

MaggieD

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
43,244
Reaction score
44,663
Location
Chicago Area
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Moderate
I love this! In fact, isn't that what was/has been offered to SSM people? "Civil Unions" -- Make 'em all civil unions. Yes. We. Can. Ha! Thanks for pointing me to this. Good job!! I was scared to death it was going to be 5,000 words. Concise. To the point. Well written. ;)
 

Darrell

Active member
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
263
Reaction score
66
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
This may actually be a good idea.
 

ksu_aviator

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
6,969
Reaction score
2,593
Location
Fort Worth Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
The word Civil Unions is poisoned fruit. Domestic Contracts is probably more acceptable.
 

azgreg

Chicks dig the long ball
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
24,905
Reaction score
23,209
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I agree. Government has no business getting involved with marriage.
 

DashingAmerican

Civil Libertarian
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
3,357
Reaction score
986
Location
Alabama
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Obviously, I think, people who still want to get married should still be able to. Just without the legal standing.
 

Menard_K

Banned
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
2,476
Reaction score
233
Location
L5
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
How positively LOGICAL ....

That is why HUMANS will never do it.

Fascinating Captain ..... Fascinating .....
 
Top Bottom