Incorrect, countries that practiced common sense eradicated it much more quickly. That's why life in New Zealand looked normal as far back as Fall 2020.
Some countries enjoyed lower overall infection rates, but numerous studies (25 and counting) have concluded that the infection rates don't correlate with strictness of lockdown measures.
I agree that common sense--and in particular, the practice of self-quarantining when ill--has a major impact on reducing the spread of infection, and that some (not all) Asian countries in particular did this better than European or North American countries. In fact, it's perfectly reasonable to state that they prevailed against the virus without the use of vaccines.
New Zealand is a closed island with a tiny population that shut its airports to foreign travel at the beginning of the pandemic. Furthermore, their lockdown measures were less strict--and in effect for less time--than most US states.
It's finite and nothing you can say changes the fact that virii are as old as life on Earth, and virii know how to mutate better than we know how to create "antidotes" unless we act in a coordinated fashion.
Viruses know how to mutate better than we know how to create vaccines
regardless of whether we act in a coordinated fashion, as the "Delta Variant" and the "Delta Plus Variant", and 10,000 vaccine-resistant strains to come readily prove.
The point is, the clinical toll and economic toll are the crisis, whereas the death toll isn't, because once you're dead, you're not part of the problem anymore, you're dead.
The death toll is the TRAGEDY.
The deaths and the economic fallout are both tragedies. I've posted on whitepapers that quantify the effect of both in terms of total years of human life lost. The number of years of life lost due to the direct and incidental effects of the lockdowns in particular dwarf the number of years of life lost due to the virus itself.
Sarcasm...the political Right in America (and Brazil) keep insisting it's just the flu, and you KNOW this, so you're basically sea-lioning at this point, nice try.
I was declaring my
agreement that COVID is measurably worse than the flu, but if you want bluntness:
COVID is far closer to the flu than to a disease that legitimately warrants the panic--both personal and governmental--and the resulting havoc we've laboured under for more than a year.
Me, I almost died from it.
I realize this, and I further realize that you've suffered long-lasting effects. For you, COVID was no run-of-the-mill influenza. Even so, the experience has compromised your ability to keep proper perspective on the issue.
We see the same thing with people who survive mass shootings and then go around demanding new laws, strictures, prohibitions, bureaucracies--
anything--regardless of effectiveness, deleterious impacts, and (lack of) moral justification. They get scared, they develop a psychological need to exert control over society at large to cope with their fear, and they embrace brash, dangerous, and/or illiberal policies they wouldn't otherwise support.