• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What happened the last time a U.S. president overrode a state to deploy the National Guard

No he is not. ICE isn't in the streets.
Really?




 
Wow, this is colossally daft, well done. You're comparing Trump's deployment of the NG to the LA scenario.
 

Secretary of Defense Hegseth promised to make the military the “most lethal, elite, and spectacular fighting force on planet earth.” How does domestic usage of the military fulfill this promise if used as law enforcement against Americans?

 
Trump is protecting ICE from violent rioters. Something Newsome nor Waltz thought was necessary.

Gavin’s failure to act in the name of safety was a non-starter.
So you admit it is a completely different situation that what LBJ faced
 

Yep history repeats. Democrats want their servant class kept around. They want the dollars and the represenation but not have to give services or worry about votes.

It's the new 3/5ths compromise for them.
 
Can one say Trump overrode Newsome when he never spoke to him about it?
Well, it's @VySky who lives in some weird wacky alternate reality where windmills cause cancer and electric boats attract sharks and water kills magnetism, so of course he'll make up all sorts of wild, wacky and weird things.
 
Lives were then and now under threat.

So no.
No you feebly trying to compare George Wallace to Gavin Newsom when the situations were completely different.
 
No you feebly trying to compare George Wallace to Gavin Newsom when the situations were completely different.
Its about lives. What do you fail to understand about that?
 
This is closer to a southern President sending in the National Guard and troops to force segregation throughout the rest of the country.
 
Its about lives. What do you fail to understand about that?
Would agree it is about protecting lives, both those of ICE and those of the protestors.
But your original OP trying to compare LBJs actions to protect the mostly all black civil rights protestors in Alabama against the all white Alabama law enforcers to what is happening now in LA was just plain Trump minion BS.
 
Its about lives. What do you fail to understand about that?
But it's not.

Do not ignore states rights. Go in and get the illegals, but wait for the state to ask for fed help on the protesters.
Nothing good will come of ignoring states rights.
 
And you've been crying since.
 
Even non-political southern white conservatives hated black people. Why was that?
It was all part of the Democratic party platform that brought people (well some of them) together. Why did Democrays hate black people so much? It's just part of their history when they were the party of slavery.
 
It was all part of the Democratic party platform that brought people (well some of them) together. Why did Democrays hate black people so much? It's just part of their history when they were the party of slavery.

Northern Democrats had that party platform? Northern Democrats hated black people?

Southern democrats were conservatives. Why did conservatives hate black people so much?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…