- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 82,886
- Reaction score
- 45,550
- Location
- USofA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
This but also keeping in mind that the military’s way of determining fat (BMI) is wildly inaccurate and hot garbage at actually determining if someone is fat.
Oh, I know.
Back after I graduated from jump school, I was 26 years old, 6'4" and 230lbs and regularly scoring 280+ on my PT test. That had me teetering on the edge of the "fat boy" program, which was ridiculous, at a solidly "overweight" BMI of 27.5. BMI assumes everyone is some sort of pencil-neck, evidently.
1,000%. The standards were set decades ago when diets and muscle mass were different, by a worldview that assumed everyone was basically the same...... and every leader in this stupid zero-tolerance world has been afraid to change them to something smarter out of fear of "looking soft on underperformers".
We had people who were high first class PFTer's who were told they were Obese, and people who couldn't pick up a F'ing ruck and move to contact to save their lives who were supposedly "in shape". I had to starve myself and pull all the water out of my body every time to make sure I passed - and could max out pullups and abs, and generally score a 65-75 on the run.... and that's with starving myself and pulling all the water out of my body (because we held the events on the same day, and did weigh in's / taping after the PFT.... an event which caused your abdominal muscles to swell......
I hated it. Have high physical standards for achievement, and enforce them.