What do you think about the Newtown family members who want to ban guns [W: 372]

[haymarket]

Why don't you define freely and then make a stance based on your own definition?

Its not my statement nor my term to define. I would NEVER use such a term in describing the rights contained in the Second Amendment.

 

[Federalist]

That would depend on what FREELY means. A little warning bell goes off when I see you intentionally and purposely inject a qualifying word into an otherwise harmless phrase to change its meaning.

I mean without interference, impediment, or restraint.

 

[blaxshep]

You are funny. Not in a comedic sort of way but in a really bizarre ironic way where you continue to have everything turned right back on you.

First you accuse me of never taking a stand and in the same post you criticize me for the stand I took on the meaning of the word INFRINGED and the Second Amendment.

Make up your mind. Reading your post and noting its obvious contradictions and hypocrisies, I am reminded of of Jack Nicholson and Faye Dunaway in CHINATOWN.....

she's my sister..... SLAP
she's my daughter...... SLAP
my sister..... SLAP
my daughter.... SLAP

Make up your mind. :roll:

Once again you purposely take no stance on anything and rely completely on deflection and intellectual dishonesty.

You never made a stand on infringement you only attempted to define it in a way that fits your obvious but unclaimed agenda.

 

[haymarket]

I mean without interference, impediment, or restraint.

From what or whom?

 

[blaxshep]

Its not my statement nor my term to define. I would NEVER use such a term in describing the rights contained in the Second Amendment.

Once again you avoid taking a stance on anything and resort to intellectual dishonesty and deflection.

I thought you said you were on a debate team. Since you are completely incapable of making a stance on anything you are also incapable of debate. You are nothing but a troll.

 

[haymarket]

Once again you purposely take no stance on anything and rely completely on deflection and intellectual dishonesty.

No deflection - I was confronting you directly.

No dishonesty - I was honestly pointing out your contradictions and hypocrisies.

 

[Federalist]

From what or whom?

From other people.

 

[haymarket]

From other people.

Like the "other people" who may own the guns you want for yourself?
Like the "other people" who make laws for the community you live in?
Like the "other people" who make laws for the state you live in?
Like the "other people" who make laws for the nation you live in?
Like the "other people" who are impacted by others gun ownership and use?

Those "other people"?

 

[Federalist]

Like the "other people" who may own the guns you want for yourself?
Like the "other people" who make laws for the community you live in?
Like the "other people" who make laws for the state you live in?
Like the "other people" who make laws for the nation you live in?
Like the "other people" who are impacted by others gun ownership and use?

Those "other people"?

Yes, except for the first category.

By freely acquire I mean to build or to be voluntarily given a firearm without interference by any third party.

Does that help?

So the question remains: Do you want people to be able to freely acquire, keep, and bear arms?

 

[blaxshep]

Haymarket; Still not a single stance on anything. That makes you nothing more than a troll.

 

[blaxshep]

No deflection - I was confronting you directly.

No dishonesty - I was honestly pointing out your contradictions and hypocrisies.

Whatever, you posts are devoid of content, you are nothing but a troll with no definable stance on anything.

 

[marywollstonecraft]

your beliefs do not correspond with my known reality

your beliefs sound like madness to me.

 

[marywollstonecraft]

The comparison with Mexico is not with America it is with the gun control utopia you believe exists. Mexico is a strict gun control country yet you think it is not safe....how can that be?

international comparisons show that in comparable countries, the murder rate is considerably less than in the US.

Statistics show that women are NOT safer in homes where there is guns.

I am not claiming it is utopia, but I really do not have to worry about the threat of gun violence.

really, truly.

 

[haymarket]

Whatever, you posts are devoid of content, you are nothing but a troll with no definable stance on anything.

you are the same guy who attacked me for my positions on issues. Make up your mind.

 

[blaxshep]

you are the same guy who attacked me for my positions on issues. Make up your mind.

I attacked you for your intellectual dishonesty.

 

[haymarket]

I attacked you for your intellectual dishonesty.

Yes - you attacked me for lots of things that exist in your mind but you have never offered any evidence to support and illustrate your baseless charges.

Will this be a historic day and you actually do the hard work to do that? :roll:

Yeah - I know - silly question. :doh

 

[Anti-Party]

While I am sorry about their loss, I have nothing but contempt for people who want to rape the rights of millions in their effort to punish someone since Lanza cheated the courts and the executioner by blowing his worthless brains out.

THEIR GRIEF does not give them a license to punish us.

I think you defined yourself in your post.

Opinions are opinions. Their opinion is not punishing you. Sometimes when we become mature adults we have to deal with the opinions of others. :lamo

 

[TurtleDude]

I think you defined yourself in your post.

Opinions are opinions. Their opinion is not punishing you. Sometimes when we become mature adults we have to deal with the opinions of others. :lamo

an interesting bit of nonsense. advice that you should take for yourself