- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Messages
- 27,254
- Reaction score
- 9,350
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Well then you had better get working on not being such a CAGW cheer leader because the peer review literature has been diverging from your point of view for a while now. You are still defending the state of the science that is 20 years.
The non-warming trend as crossed a milestone that the CAGW theory argued could never be crossed without CO2 reduction: 17 years without statistically significant warming, well below the model projections. This reality is forcing people like James Annan to rethink the 3C sensitivity that has been assumed by CAGW until this time.
What a bunch of malarky!
