Well, Its On, Officially

[NolanVoyd]

I posted an edited version of your post. I'm the one who edited it.

You didn't edit my post, you couldn't if you wanted to. It doesn't let you.

What you did is quote a part of my post in yours. As it should be. Just about every one does that. It is more clear than quoting an entire post when you are only refering to part of it. Avoids confusion.

Yet somehow it confuses you more

As you are the one who edits mine when you get stuck, and then deny you did so.

Both your post and mine are still there unedited.

 

[JMB1911A1]

Was that before or after Putin invaded Crimea on Obama’s watch?

 

[RF667799]

You didn't edit my post, you couldn't if you wanted to. It doesn't let you.

What you did is quote a part of my post in yours. As it should be. Just about every one does that. It is more clear than quoting an entire post when you are only refering to part of it. Avoids confusion.

Yet somehow it confuses you more

Both your post and mine are still there unedited.

I posted an edited version of your post. This is undeniable, and that you continue to deny it is laughable.

 

[NolanVoyd]

I posted an edited version of your post.

No you quoted part of my post in yours. The part you were responding to.

That is undeniable.

This is undeniable, and that you continue to deny it is laughable.

DP does not allow you to edit other people's posts. You cant do it. You can't even edit your own posts after the first 20 minutes

You can, however, use the quote box to quote all or part of another person's post.

You are still confused I guess.

 

[RF667799]

No you quoted part of my post in yours. The part you were responding to.

That is undeniable.

DP does not allow you to edit other people's posts. You cant do it. You can't even edit your own posts after the first 20 minutes

You can, however, use the quote box to quote all or part of another person's post.

And then publish an edited version of their post, within your own post.

You are still confused I guess.

You're still English challenged I guess.

 

[NolanVoyd]

And then publish an edited version of their post, within your own post.

And Then quote part of your comments in my post.

I havent edited your post. Your post is still there. Unedited. I couldn't edit it if o wanted to.

I quoted part of your post in mine. I did not edit your post

 

[RF667799]

Then quote part of your comments in my post.

I havent edited your post. Your post is still there. Unedited. I couldn't edit it if o wanted to.

I quoted part of your post in mine. I did not edit your post

Yes. You published an edited version of my post. Who edited it? You did.

To use your earlier analogy, the original manuscript of War and Peace doesn't cease to exist just because you might publish an edited version.

 

[NolanVoyd]

Yes. You published an edited version of my post. Who edited it? You did.

No.

I quoted part of your post in mine.
I did not edit your post. Your post is still there. Unedited.

To use your earlier analogy, the original manuscript of War and Peace doesn't cease to exist just because you might publish an edited version.

Bad use of my analogy.

If i quote part of war and peace, because i am going to talk about that part, I am not publishing an edited version of war and peace.

 

[notquiteright]

….something regarding Susie Rottencrotch?

LMMFAO!!!!!! Yeah, I seem to recall she might have been mentioned....

 

[RF667799]

No.

I quoted part of your post in mine.
I did not edit your post. Your post is still there. Unedited.

You published an edited version of my post. The least you could do is indicate it is an edited version of my original.

Bad analogy.

If i quote part of war and peace, because i am going to talk about that part, I am not publishing an edited version of war and peace.

If you represent it as if it's the entirety, of course you have.

 

[Lord of Planar]

What a ****ing joke watching President Bone Spurs salute a military procession (that will cost millions) on his birthday so he can feel bigly like his hero Vlad.

Are you saying the Army is not allowed to have it's 250th birthday celebration, on it's birthday, because it is also the president's birthday?

Just how mean are you?

The Army is the most senior branch in order of precedence amongst the armed services.It has its roots in the Continental Army, which was formed on 14 June 1775 to fight against the British for independence during the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783).​

United States Army - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

14 June 2025 is 250 years. A quarter of a millennium is meaningless to you, just to spite president Trump.

Damn.... Just how cold are you?

 

[NolanVoyd]

You published an edited version of my post.

No i didn't.

i quoted the part i was responding to

The least you could do is indicate it is an edited version of my original.

Its not an edited version.

it's a quote from your original.

If you represent it as if it's the entirety, of course you have.

Lol.

Quoting the part of War and Peace that I will discuss in no way shape or form indicates that that quote is war and peace in its entirety.

What the hell are you talking about?

Anyone who thought a few sentences quoted from War and Peace was the entire book is an idiot.

Same here.

I quoted the part I was referring to. PERIOD. Made no indication that itvwas the whole post.

Your entire post is still there. Unedited.

 

[NolanVoyd]

Are you saying the Army is not allowed to have it's 250th birthday celebration, on it's birthday, because it is also the president's birthday?

Of course they are. They already had that planned. This authoritarian crap wasnt part of the plan.

This is pure Trump.

 

[RF667799]

No i didn't.

i quoted the part i was responding to

Its not an edited version.

it's a quote from your original.

Lol.

Quoting the part of War and Peace that I will discuss in no way shape or form indicates that that quote is war and peace in its entirety.

What the hell are you talking about?

Anyone who thought a few sentences quoted from War and Peace was the entire book is an idiot.

Same here.

I quoted the part I was referring to. PERIOD. Made no indication that itvwas the whole post.

Your entire post is still there. Unedited.

You chose to publish an edited version of my post, within your own post. This is undeniable, yet you insist on denying it.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Sorry world.

The 250th birthday for the US Army is cancelled, because it is also Donald trump's birthday.

Is that what you haters want the headline to be?

 

[NolanVoyd]

You chose to publish an edited version of my post, within your own post. This is undeniable, yet you insist on denying it.

No, I quoted part of your post in my post. This is undeniable.

Your post is still there unedited.

 

[RF667799]

No, I quoted part of your post in my post. This is undeniable.

Your post is still there unedited.

You published an edited version of my post, within your post. That my original post still exists is irrelevant.

 

[Lycanthrope]

Are you saying the Army is not allowed to have it's 250th birthday celebration, on it's birthday, because it is also the president's birthday?

Just how mean are you?

The Army is the most senior branch in order of precedence amongst the armed services.It has its roots in the Continental Army, which was formed on 14 June 1775 to fight against the British for independence during the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783).​

United States Army - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

14 June 2025 is 250 years. A quarter of a millennium is meaningless to you, just to spite president Trump.

Damn.... Just how cold are you?

Your posture of innocent pearl clutching would make a high school drama club give up acting in shame.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Your posture of innocent pearl clutching would make a high school drama club give up acting in shame.

Yet you are introducing a false narrative that he is doing this for his birthday. Not the Army's birthday.

Shame on you.

 

[Phys251]

Yet you are introducing a false narrative that he is doing this for his birthday. Not the Army's birthday.

Shame on you.

"Shame," cries the person who is condoning a blatantly authoritarian move by the president.

 

[Lycanthrope]

Yet you are introducing a false narrative that he is doing this for his birthday. Not the Army's birthday.

Shame on you.

No one, not even you believes Donald is doing this for any reason other than giving himself a Big Boy Birthday Parade. Anyone who asserts differently is either gobsmackingly obtuse or lying to themselves.

But go on - tell me how Donald is spending tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to honor anyone besides himself. While you're at it, tell me you believe Donald when he says he will pay for it himself.

 

[Lycanthrope]

"Shame," cries the person who is condoning a blatantly authoritarian move by the president.

I'm curious to see how long before he tires of his doe-eyed "WHY, OH WHY MY LORD DOEZ DUH LIBZ HATEZ R ARMEEEEE!!!" farce.

 

[Lord of Planar]

"Shame," cries the person who is condoning a blatantly authoritarian move by the president.

Well, no matter who the president was, the Army would have an honor of one sort or another.

Anyone making a mountain out of this molehill, is going overboard on the hatred.

 

[Phys251]

Well, no matter who the president was, the Army would have an honor of one sort or another.

Anyone making a mountain out of this molehill, is going overboard on the hatred.

Projection. Exactly who do you think this parade will be for?

 

[NolanVoyd]

You published an edited version of my post, within your post. That my original post still exists is irrelevant.

No.

Thats called quoting.

I quoted part of your post.

I didn't "publish an edited version of" your post.

That is silly.

You are so confused.