Weakest Compromises Possible - Guns

[Michael McMahon]

Given the MAGA Chritstofascism on display by the Talibornagains who see their headlock on power slipping away to the non-religious who see through them, the insurrection was a last desperate gasp.

A lot of American gun owners refuse to criticise other gun owners because they're all an enemy of the left wing enemy. Yet if gun owners are so resilient then they should be able to withstand abusive criticism from fellow gun owners. Hence the way assault rifles are legalised is an unnecessary burden on all the gun-owners who don't own assault rifles. The cohesion of gun owners is a sign that they're not individually strong enough to advocate unique gun policy positions. The harsh reality is that immoral people cannot mind-read moral people because moral people are too evil in being overwhelmed by the dominance of evil people. As such people who try to be moral even if they fail to physically act morally can still spot others who don't intend to do good even if they accidentally end up doing good. To do good objectively is far too dissociated for anyone not shamanic to understand!


Training Day/Best scene/Antoine Fuqua/David Ayer/Ethan Hawke/Denzel Washington/Alonzo Harris

 

[RF667799]

A lot of American gun owners refuse to criticise other gun owners because they're all an enemy of the left wing enemy. Yet if gun owners are so resilient then they should be able to withstand abusive criticism from fellow gun owners. Hence the way assault rifles are legalised is an unnecessary burden on all the gun-owners who don't own assault rifles. The cohesion of gun owners is a sign that they're not individually strong enough to advocate unique gun policy positions. The harsh reality is that immoral people cannot mind-read moral people because moral people are too evil in being overwhelmed by the dominance of evil people. As such people who try to be moral even if they fail to physically act morally can still spot others who don't intend to do good even if they accidentally end up doing good. To do good objectively is far too dissociated for anyone not shamanic to understand!

That's nice when like minds can meet.

 

[JMB1911A1]

A lot of American gun owners refuse to criticise other gun owners because they're all an enemy of the left wing enemy. Yet if gun owners are so resilient then they should be able to withstand abusive criticism from fellow gun owners. Hence the way assault rifles are legalised is an unnecessary burden on all the gun-owners who don't own assault rifles. The cohesion of gun owners is a sign that they're not individually strong enough to advocate unique gun policy positions. The harsh reality is that immoral people cannot mind-read moral people because moral people are too evil in being overwhelmed by the dominance of evil people. As such people who try to be moral even if they fail to physically act morally can still spot others who don't intend to do good even if they accidentally end up doing good. To do good objectively is far too dissociated for anyone not shamanic to understand!

Classic gun control approach. Split out the AR owners from the FUDDs with deer rifles. Of course, once the ARs are gone, the ant-civil rights gun control crowd will go after the evil bolt action scoped “sniper rifle”.

Gun owners have been compromising since 1934 and have never gotten anything back (which is not how a compromise works). So. Ow the answer is not just “no”, it is HELL NO!

 

[RF667799]

Classic gun control approach. Split out the AR owners from the FUDDs with deer rifles. Of course, once the ARs are gone, the ant-civil rights gun control crowd will go after the evil bolt action scoped “sniper rifle”.

Gun owners have been compromising since 1934 and have never gotten anything back (which is not how a compromise works). So. Ow the answer is not just “no”, it is HELL NO!

Their approach worked better before the AR-15 became one of the most popular rifles in the country.

 

[JMB1911A1]

 

[vegas giants]

We don't compromise with criminals

 

[JMB1911A1]

We don't compromise with criminals

So, you are saying that legal (non-felony convicted) gun owners are criminals????

We just want NFA, GCA, etc reversed.

 

[vegas giants]

So, you are saying that all gun owners are criminals????

We just want NFA, GCA, etc reversed.

Only those that break the law


If they do....we don't compromise with criminals

 

[JMB1911A1]

Only those that break the law


If they do....we don't compromise with criminals

Wow, that goalpost moved fast. The cartoon was about gun control and how gun owners have never gotten anything in return from your side.

Personally, I think you just revealed your opinion of legal gun owners.

 

[vegas giants]

Wow, that goalpost moved fast. The cartoon was about gun control and how gun owners have never gotten anything in return from your side.

Personally, I think you just revealed your opinion of legal gun owners.

We don't compromise with criminals


I am a legal gun owner. Lol

 

[RF667799]

In another thread it's, "Tell me what number is reasonable for you to be limited to?"

Then, "No, that's not reasonable. I'm defining reasonable as my number."

 

[RF667799]

Wow, that goalpost moved fast. The cartoon was about gun control and how gun owners have never gotten anything in return from your side.

Personally, I think you just revealed your opinion of legal gun owners.

You don't know that he's a gun owner who has ended a few discussions by exclaiming that he's off to shoot his AR-15?

 

[vegas giants]

You don't know that he's a gun owner who has ended a few discussions by exclaiming that he's off to shoot his AR-15?

Smith and Wesson m@p II

 

[JMB1911A1]

You don't know that he's a gun owner who has ended a few discussions by exclaiming that he's off to shoot his AR-15?

Oh, I know it. He strikes me as a FUDD. Rights for me, but not for thee.

 

[vegas giants]

Oh, I know it. He strikes me as a FUDD. Rights for me, but not for thee.

When you lose.....always make the argument personal. Lol

 

[JMB1911A1]

Smith and Wesson m@p II

M&P. Military and Police. Why do you need a weapon of war????

Most of mine are 1911s of some flavor but I do have one M&P. Gen 1 9mm. 9L CORE with 5” barrel and optics ready slide. Running Apex trigger and Apex threaded barrel so I can suppress.

 

[JMB1911A1]

When you lose.....always make the argument personal. Lol

I don’t take life to seriously, I’ll never get out alive.

 

[vegas giants]

M&P. Military and Police. Why do you need a weapon of war????

Most of mine are 1911s of some flavor but I do have one M&P. Gen 1 9mm. 9L CORE with 5” barrel and optics ready slide. Running Apex trigger and Apex threaded barrel so I can suppress.

Because I'm a life taker and a heart breaker

 

[JMB1911A1]

When you lose.....always make the argument personal. Lol

Honestly, I don’t understand why you support some of these unconstitutional gun control measures. And the gun deaths vs homicide thing just seems to be a tired shtick at this point.

 

[JMB1911A1]

Because I'm a life taker and a heart breaker

Gunny Highway, is that you?

 

[vegas giants]

Honestly, I don’t understand why you support some of these unconstitutional gun control measures. And the gun deaths vs homicide thing just seems to be a tired shtick at this point.

Because I'm not terrified I might get a paper cut filling out a form


I'm tough like that

 

[RF667799]

Oh, I know it. He strikes me as a FUDD. Rights for me, but not for thee.

To me, the FUDDS were more like adjusting the fit of their tweeds and looking down their noses at the Hoi Polloi and their common rifles.

Once it became apparent the assault rifle bans were intended to even include some of the rimfires that the FUDDs plinked with or bought to teach their children, many of them had a change of heart.

 

[vegas giants]

To me, the FUDDS were more like adjusting the fit of their tweets and looking down their noses at the Hoi Polloi and their common rifles.

Once it became apparent the assault rifle bans were intended to even include some of the rimfires that the FUDDs plinked with or bought to teach their children, many of them had a change of heart.

I bet you were the toughest ranger in the regiment

 

[natman]

Don't forget how features that are a negotiated part of legislation become "loopholes" as soon as the ink is dry. Cases in point:

Gun Control Act of 1968. Gun control advocates wanted to require ALL firearms transactions to be handled by a licensed dealer. In order to get the bill passed, they compromised to allow the individual states to decide if transactions within that state had to go through a dealer. The Democrats have campaigned against private intrastate transactions ever since, calling it the "Gun Show Loophole", even though it has nothing to do with gun shows and isn't a loophole.

When background checks were legislated they were supposed to be "instant", hence the name "National Instant Check System" (NICS). "But what if there's a hold up in making the check?? they cried. So a "compromise" of three days max was reached. Now it's known as "The Charleston Loophole" , even though it's not a loophole at all.

 

[jamesrage]

A lot of American gun owners refuse to criticise other gun owners because they're all an enemy of the left wing enemy. Yet if gun owners are so resilient then they should be able to withstand abusive criticism from fellow gun owners. Hence the way assault rifles are legalised is an unnecessary burden on all the gun-owners who don't own assault rifles. The cohesion of gun owners is a sign that they're not individually strong enough to advocate unique gun policy positions. The harsh reality is that immoral people cannot mind-read moral people because moral people are too evil in being overwhelmed by the dominance of evil people. As such people who try to be moral even if they fail to physically act morally can still spot others who don't intend to do good even if they accidentally end up doing good. To do good objectively is far too dissociated for anyone not shamanic to understand!

1. Assault rifles are magazine fed selective fire rifles that fire an intermediate sized cartridge. These are burst and automatic firearms. What federal law would basically classify as machine guns. Due to the Hughes Amendment in the so called Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 You are not running down to the gun store, doing simple background check, forking over some cash and walking out with one. I think the term you are a looking for is assault weapon. Which are magazine fed semiautomatic handguns, rifles and shotguns with two or more cosmetic features according to the Federal Assault Weapons Ban that is the subsection of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. This meant AR-15 modern sporting rifles with both a flash suppressors and bayonet lugs were illegal while those without flash suppressors were legal.

2.Most gun owners are actually familiar with firearms. They are not morons who think you can just remove the base plate of a magazine and slip belt fed ammo through a magazine and fire it like that. Nor are they morons who think semiautomatic firearms "fire bullets faster and with more force and that It rips through whatever it hits and shreds it so that there isn't much left but pieces." So most gun owners are familar enough to know that assault weapons are not any different or dangerous than semiautomatic firearms not deemed to be assault weapons.

3.The reason most 2nd amendment advocates are cohesive is because we know that the end goal of anti-2nd amendment trash is to severely restrict or ban firearms. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that if anti-2nd amendment trash are trying ban firearms used the least in mass shootings and murders that anti-2nd amendment trash will go after firearms like handguns which are used the the most in murders and mass shootings. It doesn't take a genius to figure that if anti-2nd amendment trash are praising the gun control of countries that basically banned guns or whining how we don't have gun control laws like those countries then you do indeed want to ban firearms.