• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Watchdog group: Delaware candidate's spending 'flat-out illegal'

I haven't disagreed in any way with the fact that these are just accusations, Deuce.

I'm taking issue with MrVicchio's approach of discrediting the source.
 
I haven't disagreed in any way with the fact that these are just accusations, Deuce.

I'm taking issue with MrVicchio's approach of discrediting the source.

With no other actual information to discuss, what is there other than the source to debate?
 
We could talk about whether or not we believe the allegations, stipulating of course that they are allegations.

We could take this as yet another opportunity to talk about her qualifications or opinions.

There's really not all that much in the way about the source itself to talk about, so why not try to stick to the subject?
 
Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"


As O'Donnell tries to distance herself from the magic spells, potions, and satanic alter, the hits just keep on coming.

I expect the usual partisan B.S. to crop up around any forthcoming investigation. Hopefully, cooler heads will prevail and if there is something worth investigating, the authorities can do their job without being hindered or pushed.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"


Good old CREW, never an honest day with that lot eh?
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

Wait what? Then why isn't Rangel in jail or at least punished for his violations? (assuming they merited jail). Justice within the government is blinded by partisan leadership. I must say though, that typically Republicans are better at ousting their law breakers and corrupt politicians over the Democrats. However, neither party is clean in those regards.
 
Crew calls for fed crim investigation into christine o’donnell for campaign fraud

CREW CALLS FOR FEDERAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO CHRISTINE O’DONNELL FOR CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAUD



Comments on the complaint, anyone? My take is, that if this forces O'Donnell off the ballot, this will put Mike Castle back in the driver's seat, and once again make this a seat that Republicans can win.

Article is here.
 
Last edited:
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"


That's all this is. Demands from a watchdog group that is merely an attack dog for the Democrats, trying to shift the focus of Rangal and Waters scandals. If it turns out there is merit to these allegations well that's why we have a legal system. However considering the source, the location, this election and the desperation of the Progressive Elite... I'll take this all with a HUUUUGE grain of salt.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"


I have called for him to be punished if convicted, and if O'Donnell is guilty(which is yet to be proven), she as well should be punished with the full force of the law. Corruption and criminal acts should always be punished, and fully.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

I have called for him to be punished if convicted, and if O'Donnell is guilty(which is yet to be proven), she as well should be punished with the full force of the law. Corruption and criminal acts should always be punished, and fully.

This is something I think we can both agree on 100%. Republican or Democrat, justice should be served.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

I have called for him to be punished if convicted, and if O'Donnell is guilty(which is yet to be proven), she as well should be punished with the full force of the law. Corruption and criminal acts should always be punished, and fully.

Is anyone saying otherwise? Just curious as to why you are defending a position to which... I dont' recall anyone taking the opposite position.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

Good old CREW, never an honest day with that lot eh?

I remember you citing CREW when they were investigating John Murtha. So what's the difference now? Oh yea, she has an R next to her name.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

Is anyone saying otherwise? Just curious as to why you are defending a position to which... I dont' recall anyone taking the opposite position.

You might go read the post I am replying to. Just a thought...
 
Re: Crew calls for fed crim investigation into christine o’donnell for campaign fraud


If these charges have merit, I would agree. If they don't she should sue CBS, CREW... and anyone else pushing this fodder.

Oh and this is what you think is the best way to get the guy you like on the Ballot? Hyperpartisan "charges" from a leftwing attack group? And yes, I all ready broke these people down before buddy. Who runs the group, who pays for the group...

It's no WONDER you think they have credibility though.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

I remember you citing CREW when they were investigating John Murtha. So what's the difference now? Oh yea, she has an R next to her name.

*crickets*:3oops:
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

I remember you citing CREW when they were investigating John Murtha. So what's the difference now? Oh yea, she has an R next to her name.

Do pull that up would you? I'd love to see the context cause... I don't recall.

You see to, so my point must have had some merit.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

You might go read the post I am replying to. Just a thought...

I did read it dear. Don't take that ****ing patronizing tone with me.
 
Re: Crew calls for fed crim investigation into christine o’donnell for campaign fraud


Is CREW investigating charges Biden did similar things or is it just a far left partisan hack swarm of socialist gadflies?
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

I did read it dear. Don't take that ****ing patronizing tone with me.

If you had read it, you should have been able to follow the train of conversation.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

Do pull that up would you? I'd love to see the context cause... I don't recall.

You see to, so my point must have had some merit.

Thread with me and Murtha:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-pa...untability-b-investigations-8th-time.html
Nope, no CREW there...

http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-pa...n-attacks-cant-derail-health-care-debate.html
Nope, no CREW....

Those were the two I can find, I didn't bother to slog through the RIP threads though. I think you owe me an apology for that Dan, your memory appears faultier then mine own. Unless you found some evidence while I was looking at which point I shall respond accordingly.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

If you had read it, you should have been able to follow the train of conversation.

Obviously I'm disagreeing with your assessment of what was being said and felt you were going off on a tangent. But I suppose that was far too subtle for you. I'll be more precise next time. Would you prefer smaller words or pictures?
 
Last edited:
Re: Crew calls for fed crim investigation into christine o’donnell for campaign fraud

Is CREW investigating charges Biden did similar things or is it just a far left partisan hack swarm of socialist gadflies?

Examples of CREW at Work:

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington - SourceWatch

Who runs CREW?

SSAB

SSAB

And who pays for CREW, what is the history?

Funding

CREW is funded in part by individuals who are members of the Democracy Alliance.
SSAB

Democracy Alliance - SourceWatch
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

I did read it dear. Don't take that ****ing patronizing tone with me.

Obviously I'm disagreeing with you assessment of what was being said and felt you were going off on a tangent. But I suppose that was far too subtle for you. I'll be more precise next time. Would you prefer smaller words or pictures?

Moderator's Warning:
Your tone. Watch it.
 
Re: Watchdog: Christine O'Donnell "Clearly a Criminal"

Not a damn thing has been proven.

I think we should lay off until some real evidence has been presented.

Conservatives: People are human, don't kid yourself that a TEA Party candidate is any different from any other politician...

Liberals: Let some evidence be presented. I don't like her either, but these are after all allegations.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…