-
This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
[Washington] Should we save the Kalakala?
- Thread starter cpgrad08
- Start date
Mayor Snorkum
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2011
- Messages
- 1,631
- Reaction score
- 317
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
No. The state really should not be spending money on such projects that the people themselves have every freedom to support, or not, as they choose.
Money taken from the people by force should not be spent frivolously.
Money taken from the people by force should not be spent frivolously.
A.Pearce
Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 171
- Reaction score
- 39
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I couldn't agree more. We need to focus our state's limited resources on our crumbling roads and bridges and investing in our future (educating our children) right now. Prioritize, people!
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 42,744
- Reaction score
- 22,569
- Location
- Bonners Ferry ID USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
So saving a bit of history is considered "frivolous" huh...How much has been spent to save the original US Constitution? DoI? Are those "frivolous" also?
Thrilla
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 20,295
- Reaction score
- 9,801
- Location
- Texas, Vegas, Colombia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
the ferry is of no substantial historical importance... leave it to private investors to preserve it or not.