• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was the Charlie Kirk assassination a setup to create animosity towards the left?

Airyaman

New Druid
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 4, 2018
Messages
47,086
Reaction score
60,619
Location
AL
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Sniper shoots Kirk with one shot at 200 yards. Hits him in the neck and major blood vein or artery, practically killing him instantly.

Sniper thus far has apparently left the scene and for now is "in the wind".

Yet, this shooter left behind a rifle with engravings indicative of "transgender and antifascist" ideologies.

Is anyone buying this? With no shooter, and a gun and ammo purposely marked and left on the scene?

C'mon, anyone want to buy some beachfront property in Central AL?
 
Delay. Deny. Depose.


This may be copycat.
 
Sniper shoots Kirk with one shot at 200 yards. Hits him in the neck and major blood vein or artery, practically killing him instantly.

Sniper thus far has apparently left the scene and for now is "in the wind".

Yet, this shooter left behind a rifle with engravings indicative of "transgender and antifascist" ideologies.

Is anyone buying this? With no shooter, and a gun and ammo purposely marked and left on the scene?

C'mon, anyone want to buy some beachfront property in Central AL?

I mean, maybe. Perhaps it was a fascist who wanted to give the Trump Administration the pretext with which to initiate an authoritarian crackdown on any serious left-leaning political opposition. However, I am given to doubt that. I think this was an unhinged person on the political left who viscerally hated Charlie Kirk and wanted him dead. Lone wolf false flags are rare. And I do not think this administration has the competence or the discipline to pull off a coordinated inside hit like this. There would be just too many people who would need to be involved, and who almost certainly would blab about this. I mean, think of all the right-wing administration officials who like Charlie Kirk. This is not Fred Hampton we are talking about here. Kirk was a white fascist propagandist who was banging the drum for the administration to a younger generation. I think they would sooner have had some other, far-less popular figure assassinated if they were going to do this, along the lines of Steve Bannon.
 
Last edited:
Sniper shoots Kirk with one shot at 200 yards. Hits him in the neck and major blood vein or artery, practically killing him instantly.

Sniper thus far has apparently left the scene and for now is "in the wind".

Yet, this shooter left behind a rifle with engravings indicative of "transgender and antifascist" ideologies.

Is anyone buying this? With no shooter, and a gun and ammo purposely marked and left on the scene?

C'mon, anyone want to buy some beachfront property in Central AL?
Perhaps. At the moment no one can explain the sudden cash payment from Charlie to the Oath Keepers, but people are saying that Charlie and Donald planned this as a false flag operation.
 
Sniper shoots Kirk with one shot at 200 yards. Hits him in the neck and major blood vein or artery, practically killing him instantly.

Sniper thus far has apparently left the scene and for now is "in the wind".

Yet, this shooter left behind a rifle with engravings indicative of "transgender and antifascist" ideologies.

Is anyone buying this? With no shooter, and a gun and ammo purposely marked and left on the scene?


C'mon, anyone want to buy some beachfront property in Central AL?

Really?

 
... this shooter left behind a rifle with engravings indicative of "transgender and antifascist" ideologies.

Is anyone buying this? With no shooter, and a gun and ammo purposely marked and left on the scene?

Is that information coming from the FBI? Trump has said in the past that they cannot be trusted...

When the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago, they wouldn’t let my lawyers or representatives anywhere near them. They wouldn’t tell us what they took. Knowing them, and based on past performance, they probably later “stuffed” in other documents.
 
Sniper shoots Kirk with one shot at 200 yards. Hits him in the neck and major blood vein or artery, practically killing him instantly.

Sniper thus far has apparently left the scene and for now is "in the wind".

Yet, this shooter left behind a rifle with engravings indicative of "transgender and antifascist" ideologies.

Is anyone buying this?
I absolutely believe it. Antifas have always demonstrated a proclivity towards violence - it's their M.O.
 
I mean, maybe. Perhaps it was a fascist who wanted to give the Trump Administration the pretext with which to initiate an authoritarian crackdown on any serious left-leaning political opposition. However, I am given to doubt that. I think this was an unhinged person on the political left who viscerally hated Charlie Kirk and wanted him dead. Lone wolf false flags are rare. And I do not think this administration has the competence or the discipline to pull off a coordinated inside hit like this. There would be just too many people who would need to be involved, and who almost certainly would blab about this. I mean, think of all the right-wing administration officials who like Charlie Kirk. This is not Fred Hampton we are talking about here. Kirk was a white fascist propagandist who was banging the drum for the administration to a younger generation. I think they would sooner have had some other, far-less popular figure assassinated if they were going to do this, along the lines of Steve Bannon.
I am not suggesting the Trump admin had anything to do with it. What I am not buying is that what appears to be a very well trained shooter takes one kill shot from 200 yards away, escapes, but conveniently leaves behind a weapon and bullet casings engraved with "transgender" and "ant-fascists" imagery. That is the part that smells like a set-up to purposely point the finger towards the left, to stoke more chaos.

Heck, for all we know, it could have been a hitman hired by Russian oligarchs or any number of hostile foreign entities. All with the sole purpose to cause more political chaos.
 
I mean, maybe. Perhaps it was a fascist who wanted to give the Trump Administration the pretext with which to initiate an authoritarian crackdown on any serious left-leaning political opposition. However, I am given to doubt that. I think this was an unhinged person on the political left who viscerally hated Charlie Kirk and wanted him dead. Lone wolf false flags are rare. And I do not think this administration has the competence or the discipline to pull off a coordinated inside hit like this. There would be just too many people who would need to be involved, and who almost certainly would blab about this. I mean, think of all the right-wing administration officials who like Charlie Kirk. This is not Fred Hampton we are talking about here. Kirk was a white fascist propagandist who was banging the drum for the administration to a younger generation. I think they would sooner have had some other, far-less popular figure assassinated if they were going to do this, along the lines of Steve Bannon.

Funny you should mention Bannon. I was just thinking about how Kirk was a friendlier version of him.
 
Perhaps. At the moment no one can explain the sudden cash payment from Charlie to the Oath Keepers, but people are saying that Charlie and Donald planned this as a false flag operation.
I'm not willing to go that far on the CT ledge but something not involving Kirk (other than him being the very ideal victim), perhaps actors who want more strife and unrest in America.
 
Sniper shoots Kirk with one shot at 200 yards. Hits him in the neck and major blood vein or artery, practically killing him instantly.

Sniper thus far has apparently left the scene and for now is "in the wind".

Yet, this shooter left behind a rifle with engravings indicative of "transgender and antifascist" ideologies.

Is anyone buying this? With no shooter, and a gun and ammo purposely marked and left on the scene?

C'mon, anyone want to buy some beachfront property in Central AL?
Kirk's killing was a murder. It WAS NOT an assassination.

JFK was assassinated; Martin Luther King was assassinated; Kirk got shot. He was murdered and he deserves no more attention than that.
 
Sniper shoots Kirk with one shot at 200 yards. Hits him in the neck and major blood vein or artery, practically killing him instantly.

Sniper thus far has apparently left the scene and for now is "in the wind".

Yet, this shooter left behind a rifle with engravings indicative of "transgender and antifascist" ideologies.

Is anyone buying this? With no shooter, and a gun and ammo purposely marked and left on the scene?

C'mon, anyone want to buy some beachfront property in Central AL?
So you think it was staged. Do you also think the attempts on Trump’s life were staged?
 
Kirk's killing was a murder. It WAS NOT an assassination.

JFK was assassinated; Martin Luther King was assassinated; Kirk got shot. He was murdered and he deserves no more attention than that.
Definition 2.

assassination

noun​

  1. The act of assassinating; a killing by treacherous violence.
  2. Killing or murder for political reasons.
  3. An attack intended to ruin someone's reputation.
 
Perhaps. At the moment no one can explain the sudden cash payment from Charlie to the Oath Keepers, but people are saying that Charlie and Donald planned this as a false flag operation.
So Charlie Kirk paid the Oath Keepers to kill him? I think you’ve been watching too much Netflix.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AJG
I mean, maybe. Perhaps it was a fascist who wanted to give the Trump Administration the pretext with which to initiate an authoritarian crackdown on any serious left-leaning political opposition. However, I am given to doubt that. I think this was an unhinged person on the political left who viscerally hated Charlie Kirk and wanted him dead. Lone wolf false flags are rare. And I do not think this administration has the competence or the discipline to pull off a coordinated inside hit like this. There would be just too many people who would need to be involved, and who almost certainly would blab about this. I mean, think of all the right-wing administration officials who like Charlie Kirk. This is not Fred Hampton we are talking about here. Kirk was a white fascist propagandist who was banging the drum for the administration to a younger generation. I think they would sooner have had some other, far-less popular figure assassinated if they were going to do this, along the lines of Steve Bannon.
Alex Jones and Charlie Kirk were wedded at the hip over Sandy Hook DENIAL.
They were also wedded to CRITICIZING Trump for not releasing Trump’s epstein files.

Turning Points had turned on trump.
Think the ‘Epstein thingy’ will now go away?
 
Kirk's killing was a murder. It WAS NOT an assassination.

JFK was assassinated; Martin Luther King was assassinated; Kirk got shot. He was murdered and he deserves no more attention than that.
It fits the definition. Kirk was a well known public figure.
 
So you think it was staged. Do you also think the attempts on Trump’s life were staged?
Staged? No, Kirk is dead. What I think is staged is the supposed "evidence" of what was left behind. Unless they catch the killer, leaving behind the gun and shells purposely engraved with "transgender" and "antifascist" symbolism? That is the part that looks way off. Next time, just leave a manifesto!
 
I absolutely believe it. Antifas have always demonstrated a proclivity towards violence - it's their M.O.
So, the shooter MUST be a black guy even before he is found, is THAT your suggestion?
 
Staged? No, Kirk is dead. What I think is staged is the supposed "evidence" of what was left behind. Unless they catch the killer, leaving behind the gun and shells purposely engraved with "transgender" and "antifascist" symbolism? That is the part that looks way off. Next time, just leave a manifesto!
I see the bullets more as preliminary information rather than they’re staged. Have to wait and see as official reports are available.
 
Who shot John F. Kennedy?
America's favorite past time: Who did what and for what reason?
 
Back
Top Bottom