I don't think people are understanding this like Buffet is. They are only looking at party lines. He doesn't seem like he looks at that stuff. Raising it $15 now nationwide would be horrible. In the long run it would be fine though.
what better way to devalue higher education than by making it "free"?
do you not understand how wages are determined? they are determined by the skill level of the job.
so cashier or burger flipper or whatever. very easy skills to learn do not take advanced training and pretty much there is a almost endless supply of people that can do the job.
that means the pay is significantly less.
Network admin. specialty skill that takes trainging and an education and understanding of networking and computer in general. more specialized skill more pay.
Doctor: highly specialized skill that takes years of education and training big money pay.
CEO: a jack of all trades sort of person that is able to handle multiple issues at one time and be able to solve almost every issue or have a solution. usually the owner of the company and therefore big money.
you are paid what you are able to produce. if you produce more than what is needed then the company profits and you move up. if you produce what is required then you stay where you are at. if you produce below expectations then you are fired.
the job they are doing doesn't demand more than minimum wage is the problem.
no skill requirements and a large pool of people that can do the job pretty easily.
Why is devaluing higher education bad?...
What is with liberals and them wanting the government to provide them everything?
those on the right often have an issue with jealousy. They simply don't want everyone to have what they have. An education, a decent wage, health insurance...you name it.
What is it with libertarians and making up bull****?
What am I making up? Why don't you name me something you people will never demand the government provide or assist in providing. If that is impossible for you to do then perhaps that should tell you something.
Sure thing. But we have to establish your threshold first.
Obviously if you go with a timeframe of infinity and a minimum number of people of 1, anything will fail your little test. Because on an infinite timeframe, at least one person is going to ask for anything you could think of.
I can just as easily ask you to name me one thing "you people" will never demand be privatized. Because I can find someone who thinks we should privatize the military to let the free market work it out in the most efficient, effective manner.
So what percentage of the population needs to ask for assistance on something, and in what future timeframe does this have to fall under?
those on the right often have an issue with jealousy. They simply don't want everyone to have what they have. An education, a decent wage, health insurance...you name it.
What is with liberals and them wanting the government to provide them everything?
How about the same percentage of liberals that support UHC. What part of the economy do you think liberals will never widely support being made into a government monopoly?
Entertainment. Air travel. The internet. Automobiles. Beer. Farming. Electronics. Coffee shops. Do you want me to keep going?
I don't see much stopping liberals from supporting the internet being taken over by the government. They have already made it into a utility, so what exactly is holding them back from taking the next step? What liberals actually do is demand everything they see as an essential be provided by the government. Outside of that they want to control market activity in all outlets to make sure the market behaves in exactly the way they want. What liberals actually are is economic totalitarians and social fascists.
nope not pay wall. that is called college costs money and if you want to go to college you have to PAY for it.
as stated there are plenty of affordable colleges that students can attend.
there are also scholarships, loans, and grants that can be gotten in order to attend college as well.
so your mythological pay wall is something you have simply made up to continue the appeal to emotion argument.
What is it with libertarians and making up bull****?
What is with liberals and them wanting the government to provide them everything?
Since you have anecdotal evidence, I do as well. I also went to a private school (in the Midwest) for my primary education, I transferred out of it and went into the public school system. I was over 3 months behind in the teaching curriculum going from private to public(Math, English, Science). That private school was 3 months slower in teaching the same principles as the public school was.
So no, there is little difference in public/private schools depending upon where you are, and calling people stupid for going to a public school is a silly idea.
ah more proof that the Democrat party's pandering is going to lead to problems. They want unlimited immigration since many Latino immigrants-legal or otherwise-want handouts but at the same time this hurts black labor
Far more people, regardless of affluence are using the public school system than not.I guess that is why the affluent are sending their kids to public schools in droves (lmao), the more urban the better! Baltimore spends more per student than any other school district in the country. How is that working out? :lamo
I wonder how many Democrats in Washington are sending their kids to the public schools they support so much. None?
We already have the government in control of 12 years of failed public education. Leave colleges alone.
Liberals should be apologizing for what they have done to schools in this country.
I don't see much stopping liberals from supporting the internet being taken over by the government. They have already made it into a utility...
Another example of the ultimate failing of the libertarian mindset. It's taking Econ 101 and thinking you understand the economy, which is sort of like taking Physics 101 and thinking you're an engineer. It's not that the concepts are wrong, they're just woefully inadequate to actually explaining the real world.
No, you aren't paid what you are able to produce. Your labor has excess value. That's literally the basis of all employment. If you produce more, there's absolutely no guarantee that you "move up."
Maybe the real problem with the libertarian crowd is that they still think the world is fair.
lol.
seriously. no paywall? look at the mother****ing chart.
that isn't a pay wall. that is called what it costs to go to college, and not all colleges cost that.
if you go to a major university then yes it can cost you an arm and a leg more so if you are out of state.
however there are some really good local colleges that don't cost as much.
the reward for going to college is the ability to get a better job with better pay and more money than you can make without it.
sorry your appeal to emotion of "it's a paywall" is simply a fallacy.
then again that is why we have grants, scholarships and loans to help pay for it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?