Everybody can read it the 1st time...posting the same post over and over is being obnoxious and childish...Well it's not about it being ignored. Everyone can still read it but if it's posted more than once it's usually a direct response to a poster.
2a. Spam Posting – What constitutes spam posting can be but is not limited to the excessively repeated posting of a meme within a thread or across many threads or excessively repeated posting of cut/past responses within a thread or across many threads. Excessive and obnoxious reposting of the same content degrades the quality of the thread and makes arguments/discussion difficult. The repeated content need not be advertising. Moderator discretion will apply.I'd like clarification on whether or not cutting and pasting arguments in threads is a forum violation? They are not rude or empty of discussion, they are constructive and on-topic. Is there some reason I should have to re-type them each time? I do update them with new info but, 'if it aint broke, why fix it?'
Is it excessive and obnoxious?I'm doing the same thing re: covid arguments too. Is there a reason that I should have to re-type the same thing? And for the most part they are respectful and constructive.
Is it excessive and obnoxious?Yes, in longer threads they might be posted more than one time, or they may be a response to a different poster.
Those things are in the 'eye of the beholder'...like the mod or the people that dont like the arguments...but as I 'frequently' post, little in life is black and white and that dependency is rather simplistic so...thank you.2a. Spam Posting – What constitutes spam posting can be but is not limited to the excessively repeated posting of a meme within a thread or across many threads or excessively repeated posting of cut/past responses within a thread or across many threads. Excessive and obnoxious reposting of the same content degrades the quality of the thread and makes arguments/discussion difficult. The repeated content need not be advertising. Moderator discretion will apply.
Is it excessive and obnoxious?
Is it excessive and obnoxious?
If you're copy/paste button is used more than any other letter on your keyboard, very well could be excessive.
The 2a clarification has nothing to do with you, Lursa.Those things are in the 'eye of the beholder'...like the mod or the people that dont like the arguments...but as I 'frequently' post, little in life is black and white and that dependency is rather simplistic so...thank you.
It still says "cut/past."2a. Spam Posting – What constitutes spam posting can be but is not limited to the excessively repeated posting of a meme within a thread or across many threads or excessively repeated posting of cut/past responses within a thread or across many threads. Excessive and obnoxious reposting of the same content degrades the quality of the thread and makes arguments/discussion difficult. The repeated content need not be advertising. Moderator discretion will apply.
Is it excessive and obnoxious?
Is it excessive and obnoxious?
If you're copy/paste button is used more than any other letter on your keyboard, it very well could be excessive.
No, it doesn't.It still says "cut/past."
As much as we would like, and do try, to eliminate the "eye of the beholder" things, there will always be some stuff that just, by its very nature, really is "eye of the beholder". Be aware that we mods all look at all infractions and do not hesitate to question and play devil's advocate kinda thing. You are not going to be targeted.Those things are in the 'eye of the beholder'...like the mod or the people that dont like the arguments...but as I 'frequently' post, little in life is black and white and that dependency is rather simplistic so...thank you.
That's what it says. Perhaps you should see your eye doctor...Great, but it probably should say "copy/paste."
As much as we would like, and do try, to eliminate the "eye of the beholder" things, there will always be some stuff that just, by its very nature, really is "eye of the beholder". Be aware that we mods all look at all infractions and do not hesitate to question and play devil's advocate kinda thing. You are not going to be targeted.
Nota was infracting me for semicolon errors - when I got to 28 points I switched to hyphens.There's a lot of facets involved in providing clarity & readability - punctuation is a key component.
(So says the guy who over-uses hyphens!)
Just make sure you don't use these when brackets are more correct.Nota was infracting me for semicolon errors - when I got to 28 points I switched to hyphens.
@Luce also called out my excessive comma usage (it's true) so I've switched to parentheses to be safe.
We should just switch to only using emoji.Nota was infracting me for semicolon errors - when I got to 28 points I switched to hyphens.
@Luce also called out my excessive comma usage (it's true) so I've switched to parentheses to be safe.
Is that part of the forum rules changes? That we cannot point out what we feel is an unreliable source?Is Zero Hedge a Russian Trojan Horse?
The father of the founder of the conspiratorial site filed a criminal complaint against me in Bulgaria. Then things got weird.newrepublic.com
Finance blog Zero Hedge was banned from Twitter for Wuhan coronavirus misinformation. It's not the first time the publication has raised eyebrows.
The financial blog that rose to popularity in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis has since been labeled "far-right" and "pro-Trump."www.businessinsider.com
Google bans website ZeroHedge from its ad platform over comments on protest articles
A Google spokesperson said in an email that it took action after determining the website violated its policies on content related to race.www.nbcnews.com
Why Did Financial Flamethrower Zero Hedge Go All in on Conspiracy Theories?
To its fans it’s a top-notch financial analyst publisher. To its detractors it’s trash. But to many it’s an increasingly dark well of tinfoil-hat conjecture.www.institutionalinvestor.com
JPMorgan has pulled ads from Zero Hedge that ended up there by accident
Despite forbidding its ads from running on the controversial finance blog's US edition, until recently they still appeared in the UK.qz.com
PolitiFact - Websites spin unproven link between Canada, China about coronavirus outbreak
A widely shared article on social media inaccurately claims Canada is the source of the 2019 coronavirus outbreak in Chiwww.politifact.com
And that's just one publication.
What's wrong with pointing out that the source sucks?
.
Oh, people would argue that the correct emoji wasn't used.We should just switch to only using emoji.
You can't have bad grammar if there are no rules in the first place.
No, that is not part of the rule changes.Is that part of the forum rules changes? That we cannot point out what we feel is an unreliable source?
Sorta' like how the trump supporters and the gop in general refuses to believe trump lost the last election? I don't agree trump lost so in my mind he's still president. I think that's what you really meant to post?No partisan rage here.
You really think that those cites aren't pushing their politically preferred agenda?
Just happens to align with your political views doesn't condone higher or better status.
What's wrong with refuting the content rather than from where it may come?
I'm reading 'I refuse to accept anything which isn't what I agree with'. That'd be your cross to bear, not mine.
agreedMeh, I'm done.
•ißÊL1ÊVÊwéSHÖULDàllßÊréqu1rédTÖpôstUS1NGthéCAMnéwtônSYSTÊM•We should just switch to only using emoji.
You can't have bad grammar if there are no rules in the first place.
Į̸̡̡̤̘̘̫̭̭̗̜͙̝̀̐̾̑͋͆͘͠ͅͅ ̷̯̥̙̙̮̓́a̸̬̼̥̼͍̙͙̗̙̐̅̌̈́̄͋̓m̷̯̥͇̝͖̦̿̐̒̋͋̓͌ ̵̢̛̛̘͔̬̳̼̫͍̭̼̂̈́̈́́̂̀͌͂̋͜͝͠ͅn̷̨̡͕͓͖̹̬͖̘͎̞̞̺͑̇́̆̈́͋̈̒̕̕o̷̤͋̔͛̌͆̍̓̽̕t̴͖͉͓̎̽̋́̈́͊̂̉̽̏͗ ̷̗̺̲͙̬̟̳̱̹̞̎̅̍̑̈́́͝͠͝s̸̡̭̤͗͗̏u̵͎͉̱̗͉̬̣̤̺͛̔͑̈́̅̎̿̽̄͗̓̆͝͠ř̸͕̪̦̌̽̉̄̃̆̇̑́̿e̸̞̮̗͈̾͛̍̊̊͌̏̎́̉̐͋ ̸̧̦̱̥̖͎͔̘͖̺̭̼̮͌́̏̆͘͜͠İ̶̪̙̫͆͝ ̶͈͎̼͔͔̩̱̯͈̪̱̈̿͗͒̔͒͋́a̴̹͚̲̗̳̤̓͛̒̋̾̓͜g̶͉͎̟͕̺̘̩̙̤̜̮̤͆͐͋̾̊́̎͒̈́̓̍̏̂̕̕r̴̨̧̳͙̰̩̲̲̋̓͊̋͗̾͒̆̒͝͝͠͝e̴͖̯̝͈̘͇̍̏͋ͅe̷͓̮̖̻̬̒̀̄͐̈͒̀͊͌̃̄͋̚̚͠ ̸̤̲̝̠̀̿w̴̡̼̼͖̰̹͍͐̑̊̄̂͐̆͂͝͝ͅį̶̤̩̦̝̜̣̍̍̀̌ţ̴̮͔͙̙͈̣͖̭͈̱̲͒͋̂̒ͅĥ̸̘͇̣͍͉̺̜̳͇̾̿̔̄͒̌́̑̃̐̚͜͜͝ ̸̨̨͍̯̳̗̜̪̫̹̮͆̈̓̈́̿͊̊̈͛̀̅̋͜ỳ̵̨͓͇̲ǫ̵̼̣̰̹̬̍͆̈́̒̉̍̐̎̊̈́̈́̀̀ư̵̛͇̫̜̑̉̓̄̓͂͒́̓͂̄̎ ̶̨͍̟̖͚͈̘̄͊̀̆̽͋̀̂̊͋̾̄̚͠͠o̴̢͎͎̩̳͙̤͑̒̍̀̐͜͝ͅn̸͇̳̪̹̾̿̒ ̷̡̧̧̭͎̝̹͎̣͙̙͎̤̞̒̒̀͊̈͘t̷̼̰̯͖̒̽͒͑̅̐̀̈́̀͑͗̀͘h̷̛͓͙̒̇̅̍̈̋̀̌͑͐͑͛i̷̛͕̖̦͎̯̰̗͎̹͗s̵̜̒̍̔̃̆̄͂̉́̾̆̈̀͂̚•ißÊL1ÊVÊwéSHÖULDàllßÊréqu1rédTÖpôstUS1NGthéCAMnéwtônSYSTÊM•
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?