I wouldn't know and it's not my call, but hey...if the shoe fits...Looks like rule 2a is aimed at my calling out of fake news sites.
.
All the smart people know that Tyler durden isn’t posting real news anywayLooks like rule 2a is aimed at my calling out of fake news sites.
.
If you mean your plagiarism of content from other sites that ignores the thread topic and just attacks the source of information, regardless of the information's veracity, then yes, it seems to do just that.Looks like rule 2a is aimed at my calling out of fake news sites.
.
Rule 2a typo: "cut/past"Link at the top of the page: Forum Rules
Changes: (9/15/2021)
1. Added rule 2a to clarify SPAM rule
2. Grammar - thanks @nota bene !!!
3. Updated Advertising rule (in short, no advertising)
4. Added items from addendum, including Vegas rule to keep everything centralized and in one post
Thanks for participating in the best Political forum on the planet.
If you mean your plagiarism of content from other sites that ignores the thread topic and just attacks the source of information, regardless of the information's veracity, then yes, it seems to do just that.
Meh, I'm done... this should end well.
Posting MediaBiasFactCheck's amateur opinion is hardly 'calling out of fake news sites'.Looks like rule 2a is aimed at my calling out of fake news sites.
.
Re: 2A. I have a feeling Nota Bene was pissed off at the fact that I have several arguments that I use...and yes, cut and paste...in the abortion forum. She comes into that forum, comments, and then refuses to engage in discussion. That's fine, that's anyone's choice. However she complained that it was the same old thing over and over and it was abusive to newcomers. @nota beneLink at the top of the page: Forum Rules
Changes: (9/15/2021)
1. Added rule 2a to clarify SPAM rule
2. Grammar - thanks @nota bene !!!
3. Updated Advertising rule (in short, no advertising)
4. Added items from addendum, including Vegas rule to keep everything centralized and in one post
Thanks for participating in the best Political forum on the planet.
Posting MediaBiasFactCheck's amateur opinion is hardly 'calling out of fake news sites'.
It more like denigrating sites, via amateur opinion, who's opinions you don't agree with, rather than factually challenging the content of that opinion. Intellectually lazy.
Yeah I reread the rules but didn’t see it eitherMaybe I missed them but what are the new grammar rules?
Doesn't alter the facts of MediaBiasFactCheck's amateur and left leaning opinion you are so fond of citing, without any sort of contribution of your own.Is Zero Hedge a Russian Trojan Horse?
The father of the founder of the conspiratorial site filed a criminal complaint against me in Bulgaria. Then things got weird.newrepublic.com
Finance blog Zero Hedge was banned from Twitter for Wuhan coronavirus misinformation. It's not the first time the publication has raised eyebrows.
The financial blog that rose to popularity in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis has since been labeled "far-right" and "pro-Trump."www.businessinsider.com
Google bans website ZeroHedge from its ad platform over comments on protest articles
A Google spokesperson said in an email that it took action after determining the website violated its policies on content related to race.www.nbcnews.com
Why Did Financial Flamethrower Zero Hedge Go All in on Conspiracy Theories?
To its fans it’s a top-notch financial analyst publisher. To its detractors it’s trash. But to many it’s an increasingly dark well of tinfoil-hat conjecture.www.institutionalinvestor.com
JPMorgan has pulled ads from Zero Hedge that ended up there by accident
Despite forbidding its ads from running on the controversial finance blog's US edition, until recently they still appeared in the UK.qz.com
PolitiFact - Websites spin unproven link between Canada, China about coronavirus outbreak
A widely shared article on social media inaccurately claims Canada is the source of the 2019 coronavirus outbreak in Chiwww.politifact.com
And that's just one publication.
What's wrong with pointing out that the source sucks?
.
I mean, I'm not opposed to perma-ban for failure to use the proper form of "their" or "too" but getting nickle and dimed for missing a comma or using a colon instead of a semicolon seems excessive. Also, I struggle with remembering the proper way to use plural possessives. I may have even dangled my participles once or twice but, truth be told, I don't even remember what they're for at this point in my life.Yeah I reread the rules but didn’t see it either
Doesn't alter the facts of MediaBiasFactCheck's amateur and left leaning opinion you are so fond of citing, without any sort of contribution of your own.
Your post above is only more of the same.
It's OK though. I've learned to ignore the vast majority of your posts which only cite MediaBiasFactCheck, so it's all good here.
Yep, I liked your source posts..once per thread if its a terrible source in the OP wasn't too obnoxious IMO.And that's just one publication.
What's wrong with pointing out that the source sucks?
I'm guessing the grammar in the rules, not a "grammar rule". As in Nota found some mistakes and he corrected them?Maybe I missed them but what are the new grammar rules?
Because you offer no comment beyond that and while zerohedge is a hack site most of the time they are offering opinions on real news. So claiming a bad site on something that is real news is just trolling because you don't agree with the opinionIs Zero Hedge a Russian Trojan Horse?
The father of the founder of the conspiratorial site filed a criminal complaint against me in Bulgaria. Then things got weird.newrepublic.com
Finance blog Zero Hedge was banned from Twitter for Wuhan coronavirus misinformation. It's not the first time the publication has raised eyebrows.
The financial blog that rose to popularity in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis has since been labeled "far-right" and "pro-Trump."www.businessinsider.com
Google bans website ZeroHedge from its ad platform over comments on protest articles
A Google spokesperson said in an email that it took action after determining the website violated its policies on content related to race.www.nbcnews.com
Why Did Financial Flamethrower Zero Hedge Go All in on Conspiracy Theories?
To its fans it’s a top-notch financial analyst publisher. To its detractors it’s trash. But to many it’s an increasingly dark well of tinfoil-hat conjecture.www.institutionalinvestor.com
JPMorgan has pulled ads from Zero Hedge that ended up there by accident
Despite forbidding its ads from running on the controversial finance blog's US edition, until recently they still appeared in the UK.qz.com
PolitiFact - Websites spin unproven link between Canada, China about coronavirus outbreak
A widely shared article on social media inaccurately claims Canada is the source of the 2019 coronavirus outbreak in Chiwww.politifact.com
And that's just one publication.
What's wrong with pointing out that the source sucks?
.
Because you offer no comment beyond that and while zerohedge is a hack site most of the time they are offering opinions on real news. So claiming a bad site on something that is real news is just trolling because you don't agree with the opinion
Oh crap... where did I screw up? Nota is perfect!!I'm guessing the grammar in the rules, not a "grammar rule". As in Nota found some mistakes and he corrected them?
No partisan rage here.All I see is partisan rage.
You really think that those cites aren't pushing their politically preferred agenda?Why reference fake news sites? Why not reference Associated Press or Reuters?
I'm reading 'I refuse to accept anything which isn't what I agree with'. That'd be your cross to bear, not mine.Because those stories aren't real.
It's/Its...I mean, I'm not opposed to perma-ban for failure to use the proper form of "their" or "too" but getting nickle and dimed for missing a comma or using a colon instead of a semicolon seems excessive. Also, I struggle with remembering the proper way to use plural possessives. I may have even dangled my participles once or twice but, truth be told, I don't even remember what they're for at this point in my life.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?