[W: 542] Non gun owners have smaller members according to this study?

[Metric Mouse]

No, there is no real connection. Even men who are dissatisfied buy guns.

But at a much lower rate, statistically different enough to point out that dissatisfied men are much less likely to own guns.

The only thing that study shows is that the sexual inadequacy is not the main driver that those who point to a small penis big gun theory think it is.

It shows this, but also it shows the inverse- small penis means no gun.

 

[Cosmo]

keep talking?

Was this thread meant as a joke?

 

[Metric Mouse]

Was this thread meant as a joke?

Nah, but your replies seemed to be!?

Or did you have something worth discussing to say?

 

[Cosmo]

Nah, but your replies seemed to be!?

Or did you have something worth discussing to say?

Well, it sounded like a pretty weak study, so I thought you were kidding when you posted it. After all, what is a "military-style rifle?"

 

[Metric Mouse]

Well, it sounded like a pretty weak study, so I thought you were kidding when you posted it. After all, what is a "military-style rifle?"

What didn't you like about the study? I didn't conduct it, I won't be hurt if you find a flaw in it.

But all you did was mention dicks and guns... I'd love a more in depth discussion, if you have something to say.

 

[Cosmo]

What didn't you like about the study? I didn't conduct it, I won't be hurt if you find a flaw in it.

But all you did was mention dicks and guns... I'd love a more in depth discussion, if you have something to say.

What I just said: what is a "military-style rifle?" You quoted a line that specified this term. What exactly is that? The study text I was able to see does not define it, which makes it seem amateurish.

 

[Metric Mouse]

What I just said: what is a "military-style rifle?" You quoted a line that specified this term. What exactly is that? The study text I was able to see does not define it, which makes it seem amateurish.

For sure.

The study defines that, for the study: “any semi-automatic or fully automatic military-style rifles, such as AR-15, AK-47, or SCAR”

Not sure why that is amateurish, since it doesn't actually have an effect on the results of the study.

 

[Cosmo]

For sure.

The study defines that, for the study: “any semi-automatic or fully automatic military-style rifles, such as AR-15, AK-47, or SCAR”

Not sure why that is amateurish, since it doesn't actually have an effect on the results of the study.

The AR-15 is a Western civilian semi-auto rifle. AK-47 is a Soviet assault rifle with automatic fire capabilities. The former is just a "rifle." Not sure what it has to do with the military.

 

[Metric Mouse]

The AR-15 is a Western civilian semi-auto rifle. AK-47 is a Soviet assault rifle with automatic fire capabilities. The former is just a "rifle." Not sure what it has to do with the military.

Ok.

Well I am not one to argue with the authors of the study. But if the AK-47 is a military rifle, and the SCAR is a military style rifle, why do you argue that the ar 15 is not a "military style rifle" when it is styled after, and very similar to, the rifle the United States used to use to equip its troops?

And again - not very important to the results. The ownership of these weapons, as defined by the study, didn't change their results, did it?

 

[Lord of Planar]

Ok.

Well I am not one to argue with the authors of the study. But if the AK-47 is a military rifle, and the SCAR is a military style rifle, why do you argue that the ar 15 is not a "military style rifle" when it is styled after, and very similar to, the rifle the United States used to use to equip its troops?

And again - not very important to the results. The ownership of these weapons, as defined by the study, didn't change their results, did it?

The difference is the AR-15 is just a semi-automatic. The military version of it is the M16.

 

[CLAX1911]

Gun owners are interested in guns. You're interested in dicks (big ones). OK, we get it. </thread>

Can't they be interested in both? I'm a gay guy but there are a lot of straight women that are interested in guns.

 

[soylentgreen]

You can disagree all you want you are incorrect one side defines it's existence by focusing on the object

No they don't. There's no one attitude of people with guns. So that's a dumb talking point

Jealousy is an ugly thing

Yeah God is a concept a queen is a dark ages throwback

You are a subject.

Only as long a the object is guns so that they can keep avoiding the real issues.

True, which does not make my statement any less true as some do.

Not jealousy to state a fact.

No, god is ancient myth while the present king is a clown.

Bullshit, the royalty lost that ability long ago. they are nothing now but a figure head.

 

[soylentgreen]

But at a much lower rate, statistically different enough to point out that dissatisfied men are much less likely to own guns.


It shows this, but also it shows the inverse- small penis means no gun.

It showed no such thing. It did though make it clear that there is no clear correlation. Simply an association which you are still trying to make.

 

[CLAX1911]

Only as long a the object is guns so that they can keep avoiding the real issues.

Who avoids these issues and what issues?

True, which does not make my statement any less true as some do.

Not jealousy to state a fact.

That's what jealous people say.

No, god is ancient myth while the present king is a clown.

But it's an idea not a backwards bronze age government.

God can be anything you want to be

Bullshit, the royalty lost that ability long ago. they are nothing now but a figure head.

So you haven't figured head to pay homage to your backwardness? You don't have that so we're more evolved

 

[soylentgreen]

Who avoids these issues and what issues?

That's what jealous people say.

But it's an idea not a backwards bronze age government.

God can be anything you want to be

So you haven't figured head to pay homage to your backwardness? You don't have that so we're more evolved

The issues about the attitude of those with guns. As I have already said.

No, you just cannot think of a better reason rather than anyone is jealous.

Right! And god is not a primitive concept itself.

Why not god is merely imagination

Who the **** pays homage to charlie.

 

[Rich2018]

True, they do for all sorts of reasons. This article merely points out that there is little in the way of any truth about small penis and guns. And that there are many reasons to buy a gun including the one I mentioned.

The other thing this thread points out is that some here would rather make useless assumptions rather than do the work of reading and comprehending what was written.

Not really
People buy guns because they like guns - with perhaps a small exception of those who need them in their jobs.

 

[CLAX1911]

The issues about the attitude of those with guns. As I have already said.

Be specific. I didn't regard it because it didn't mean anything.

No, you just cannot think of a better reason rather than anyone is jealous.

Right! And god is not a primitive concept itself.

Why not god is merely imagination

Who the **** pays homage to charlie.

I'm more interested in the attitudes of gun owners than pissing contests.

 

[soylentgreen]

Not really
People buy guns because they like guns - with perhaps a small exception of those who need them in their jobs.

I agree. But then you are only giving us a good reason for buying a gun. There are also bad reasons to buy guns as well. Such as criminals might have.

 

[soylentgreen]

Be specific. I didn't regard it because it didn't mean anything.




I'm more interested in the attitudes of gun owners than pissing contests.

No, your more interested in a pissing contest which is why you brought up royalty and your imaginary god as well as what I said that you now claim means nothing to you.

Far to many crimes committed with guns and yet still a refusal by many to do anything more about it than waste time with worthless arguments.

 

[CLAX1911]

No, your more interested in a pissing contest which is why you brought up royalty and your imaginary god as well as what I said that you now claim means nothing to you.

Far to many crimes committed with guns and yet still a refusal by many to do anything more about it than waste time with worthless arguments.

So what's the attitude that gun owners have?

 

[Rich2018]

I agree. But then you are only giving us a good reason for buying a gun. There are also bad reasons to buy guns as well. Such as criminals might have.

They say that guns don't cause crime and that's largely correct
Except in instances where a criminal, or potential criminal, is emboldened by the possession of a gun, enough to commit a crime, when he otherwise would not.

 

[CLAX1911]

...

So you didn't have anything to say about this attitude?

 

[soylentgreen]

They say that guns don't cause crime and that's largely correct
Except in instances where a criminal, or potential criminal, is emboldened by the possession of a gun, enough to commit a crime, when he otherwise would not.

Which brings me back to my opening argument. Guns are not the problem in america. Peoples attitude with guns is the problem.

 

[soylentgreen]

So what's the attitude that gun owners have?

I am not going to waste my time repeating what I just said.

 

[CLAX1911]

I am not going to waste my time repeating what I just said.

So it's just some stupid bigotry type casting you made up so you don't have to have an argument.

Way to stay rational.

There's not a universal attitude I know you're full of shit when you said at the first time.