- Joined
- Jun 16, 2020
- Messages
- 8,157
- Reaction score
- 5,462
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
They do not say that.They do not permit registration
Very important when you have “textualist” justices
They do not say that.They do not permit registration
lol how very fascist of you. passing a law you know is unconstitutional, that would immediately be stayed, purely intended to inconvenience and punish law abiding citizens, and that would have exactly zero effect on shootings in the US.
Where's your source they primarily use them on semi?Where’s your source that soldiers primarily use their M4’s/M16’s on full-auto or burst?
lol okI carried an M16 for 8 years in the Army including a deployment to Iraq. I used burst ONE TIME during my entire career and throughout the tens of thousands of rounds I fired: during Final Protective Fire training at Basic.
sure you did. But regardless, as I correctly pointed out. No army on earth uses an AR15. They are not in any way, weapons of war.Other than that, I used my rifle in semi-auto and it was practically no different from a civilian AR-15.
For now.Similarly, the 1st Amendment doesn’t permit credentialing the Press. Anyone who claims to be the Press must be treated as the Press and the government can’t require them to get credentials.
Yes, they do.They do not say that.
They do not permit registration.Very important when you have “textualist” justices
Sticking your fingers in your ears doesn’t change thatYes, they do.
They do not permit registration.
Because you are ignorant of constitutional law.I know it is not unconstitutional...
Why do you advocate the passing of "laws" that are entirely ineffectual? Most firearms are not imported. Most ammo is not imported.Just like the president can ban the importation of firearms and ammunition TODAY with no approval from congress... Biden should get off his ass and make it happen...
I know. The constitution doesn't permit registration, no matter how hard you stomp your feet.Sticking your fingers in your ears doesn’t change that
An AR style weapon is not for common use for lawful purposes. Same with the machine gun. It can be done.You can't ban any gun in common usage for lawful purposes. DV v Heller.
No it can't.
Oh, I understand constitutional law. I also know that “conservatives” don’t give a shit about constitutional law.Because you are ignorant of constitutional law.
Why do you advocate the passing of "laws" that are entirely ineffectual? Most firearms are not imported. Most ammo is not imported.
I’m not the one who hasn’t quoted the constitution. I asked you to show me, but you’d rather just say I don’t know anything.I know. The constitution doesn't permit registration, no matter how hard you stomp your feet.
It is the most popular and widely owned semi auto rifle in the US, and used in less than 1% of crimes. It is by definition in common use for lawful purposes.An AR style weapon is not for common use for lawful purposes.
No, it can't. Machine guns are not banned. You can go to your local class 3 dealer today and purchase one.Same with the machine gun. It can be done.
Look to the division currently actively SOWED in this country today.Other countries... so what are we doing wrong?
Where's your source they primarily use them on semi?
lol ok
sure you did. But regardless, as I correctly pointed out. No army on earth uses an AR15. They are not in any way, weapons of war.
By your posts, you clearly do not.Oh, I understand constitutional law.
That might be true. You'd have to talk to a conservative.I also know that “conservatives” don’t give a shit about constitutional law.
Because you are ignorant of constitutional law.
Why do you advocate the passing of "laws" that are entirely ineffectual? Most firearms are not imported. Most ammo is not imported.
I know. The constitution doesn't permit registration, no matter how hard you stomp your feet.
I've quoted 3 separate amendments it violates.I’m not the one who hasn’t quoted the constitution.
I've shown you. 2nd, 4th and 5th amendments.I asked you to show me, but you’d rather just say I don’t know anything.
Explain.
The "gun culture" is not the problem.
It's our "sin culture" that's the problem.
You pointed to them. You didn’t quote themI've quoted 3 separate amendments it violates.
I've shown you. 2nd, 4th and 5th amendments.
Lol the bermuda defense force.That’s not true either. The Bermuda Defense Force does use the AR-15. Or at least did in the past.
Yes, there is.But there is no practical difference between the ways soldiers use their M16’s/M4’s in 99% of combat and a civilian AR-15.
I do. It's why I'm able to correct you.If you knew anything about the military, you would know that.
I agree with most of this.Fully automatic and burst fire is highly inaccurate. Except for suppressive fire at close range, full auto from a rifle is basically useless.
some do, some don't. The simple fact remains the same. No army on earth uses an AR15. They are not weapons of war. The simple fact remains also, even if they were, it's irrelevant.Soldiers fire their rifles in semi-auto and every single veteran on this site will confirm what I just said.
It is entirely unconstitutional.Taxing firearms and ammunition to cover the cost of firearms injuries and death is not unconstitutional..
No. I just don't see the point of passing completely useless and ineffectual laws that will in no way have any effect on mass shootings.Then banning the importation should have no effect on the market. Afraid you are wrong?
Is voting an enumerated right?Does is permit registration for voting?
Lol the bermuda defense force.
Yes, there is.
I do. It's why I'm able to correct you.
I agree with most of this.
some do, some don't. The simple fact remains the same. No army on earth uses an AR15. They are not weapons of war. The simple fact remains also, even if they were, it's irrelevant.
LolYou pointed to them. You didn’t quote them