- Joined
- Sep 22, 2012
- Messages
- 42,433
- Reaction score
- 12,599
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
And people still drankWhen guns are treated like alcohol was in the 1800s.
And people still drankWhen guns are treated like alcohol was in the 1800s.
We have guns in our house as well, I'd GLADLY give them up to save 20 kids.
I cannot imagine the depth of their pain....I think a nationwide ceremony of lighting candles to represent both the loss of innocent children and the pledge to end the cycle would be appropriate. Those who can't sign on should be silent.Tonight there are grieving parents and grandparents and others--what would you suggest to help them personally tonight?
At this point I am ready to say **** the 2A. The right's stubborn refusal to address this issue with any degree of seriousness will push more and more people to adopt a similar mindset.
You are correct. But I believe we can nibble around the edges. The old slogan that “when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns” is correct. We can, however, create laws that - to paraphrase Camus or someone who was speaking of “tortured children”- if we cannot create a world where school children are murdered, we can at least try to reduce the number of murdered school children.The problem is not resolvable. We put the right to bare arms in our constitution and today we have more guns than citizens. At this point, restricting or outlawing guns will only have negative consequences on law abiding citizens, because it won't prevent criminals from possessing them. The only thing right now preventing criminals from robbing people at will, is them not knowing if the people they are targeting are armed or not. If this country had outlawed guns from it's founding it would be different, but since we didn't, trying to prevent ordinary people from buying them now, or trying to get rid of them all together, just isn't a viable option.
.
2nd, 4th and 5th amendment.
The gun took what should have been a minor incident and turned it into a mass casualty event.It's a symptom of our society in decay and that's what we need to deal with.
What law would have prevented this? What law was not enforced?Guns.
Again.
Once again, our laws and their level of enforcement were unable to prevent this tragedy.
No we don’t.Using data from 2020, we experience, on average, one death by gunshot every 12 minutes in the United States of America.
And not even in the top 5 causes of death.45,000 deaths by gunshot in 2020.
First things first. Schools.We literally just saw a grocery store with an armed security guard be the site of a mass shooting. What is the answer then? Guards with AR-15s and full body armor roaming every public space?
No, it's not fantasy. Fewer guns, fewer gun deaths. It's simple math.It's a fantasy to think that you or I giving up our guns will save peoples' lives.
Not at allYou can’t ban them. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this. See DC v Heller.
You could ban them tomorrow and it would not reduce the tens of millions already in circulation by a single magazine, nor stop the manufacture importation or purchase of one.
This is a made up term.
I’m spinning you around in circles with facts. You don’t o ow anything about firearms.
No, as giving them up would not save 20 kids lives.So, you wouldn't give up your guns to save 20 kids' lives?
Yes, I’ve shown I am a responsible law abiding citizen. I can not be and will not be punished because someone else broke the law.When people show you are, believe them.
False dilemma fallacy.Who cares if it saves kids lives?
Would you give up your guns to save 18 kids' lives? I would.
At this point I am ready to say **** the 2A. The right's stubborn refusal to address this issue with any degree of seriousness will push more and more people to adopt a similar mindset.
He asked. I’m not advocating it; I’m saying it would be a gun control solution.Why?
Just have any of the deplorables advocating gun control lined up in front of a firing squad.About the most ignorant ****ing answer I could have imagined.
Your name wouldn't be Gregg Abbott would it?
Not always.
But obviously it is acceptable.
Do people have the choice to make and buy guns?Nobody's going to stop manufacturing and buying guns, certainly not a poor person like yourself. Guns are a billion dollar industry, and today anyone in the world can buy guns via e-commerce websites.
You'd have better luck just banning the internet, and it doesn't matter either way, because we're simply not going to let you and work to have the uneducated rabble who promote gun control imprisoned so that their stupidity can't taint the rest of our society and intellectual discussions of the topic.
Perfect!Great idea, I'm going to cut my own dick off in order to help prevent rape.
No you couldn’t.We could theoretically stop the importation and domestic manufacturing of firearms.
A complete ban would have no effect on the amount of firearms currently in circulation or the amount that would be added.But it would take decades for firearm ownership to be at the levels we see in countries like the UK or even Sweden.
All of them are unregistered.We have more guns than citizens and who knows how many unregistered ones.
And there it is.Oh, you want seriousness. You mean like your proposal to confiscate 400 million guns from private citizens by force in total violation of the highest law in the land?
This is incoherent. Try again.Do you have agency?