• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:#356]Students lose access to books amid ‘state-sponsored purging of ideas’

j brown's body

"A Soros-backed animal"
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
79,089
Reaction score
83,526
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Republican state repression is kicking into high gear.

"The start of the 2022-2023 school year will usher in a new era of education in some parts of America — one in which school librarians have less freedom to choose books and schoolchildren less ability to read books they find intriguing, experts say.

In the past two years, six states have passed laws that mandate parental involvement in reviewing books, making it easier for parents to remove books or restrict the texts available at school, according to a tally kept by nonprofit EveryLibrary. Five states are considering similar legislation. Typical of these is an Arizona bill, signed by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in April, that requires districts to send parents who ask lists of the books their children check out, as well as to publish the titles of all library materials bought after Jan. 1. Policies are proliferating at the district level, too: One Nebraska system will require that parents sign permission slips for library books. A Texas system will divide its library into “juvenile,” “young adult” and “adult” sections, with parents choosing the “level” their child can access.


“This is a state-sponsored purging of ideas and identities that has no precedent in the United States of America,” said John Chrastka, EveryLibrary’s executive director. “We’re witnessing the silencing of stories and the suppressing of information [that will make] the next generation less able to function in society.”"

Ironically, this 18 year old has most informed and mature insight into the issue:

"...Lily Van Bergen, 18, who graduated from the Bedford system this spring, is worried. She said her hometown is largely White, Christian and conservative. She predicted parental supervision of reading will shrink students’ understanding of the world."

Link
 
One Nebraska system will require that parents sign permission slips for library books. A Texas system will divide its library into “juvenile,” “young adult” and “adult” sections, with parents choosing the “level” their child can access.
 
One Nebraska system will require that parents sign permission slips for library books. A Texas system will divide its library into “juvenile,” “young adult” and “adult” sections, with parents choosing the “level” their child can access.

Sounds like prison.

Schools are for students, not for parents.

Well, there's always the internet.
 
Sounds like prison.
Schools are for students, not for parents.
Well, there's always the internet.
right. because we need to sexualize kids as early as possible and teach them to hate the USA -parents be damned
 
One Nebraska system will require that parents sign permission slips for library books. A Texas system will divide its library into “juvenile,” “young adult” and “adult” sections, with parents choosing the “level” their child can access.
This seems a reasonable compromise, doesn’t it?

Especially for schools that have a wide age range in the building?

The public high school here goes from 7-12 grade. One elementary school from 4-6

Wouldn’t it make sense that you wouldn’t necessarily want a 4th grader reading some materials more appropriate for 6th graders? Or 7th graders reading materials more appropriate for 11-12th graders?
 
Sounds like prison.

Schools are for students, not for parents.

Well, there's always the internet.
How is that “like a prison”?

Do you think 7th graders are as mature as 12th?

Or 4th as mature as 6th?

Do you not think parents should have an input into whether they deem material age appropriate?
 
This seems a reasonable compromise, doesn’t it?

Especially for schools that have a wide age range in the building?

The public high school here goes from 7-12 grade. One elementary school from 4-6

Wouldn’t it make sense that you wouldn’t necessarily want a 4th grader reading some materials more appropriate for 6th graders? Or 7th graders reading materials more appropriate for 11-12th graders?
hard to say exactly on the age stuff, but "age appropriate" is the guideline here in florida.
Kids are minors, their parents need to know what they are being exposed to in school. It's a no brainer
 
Sounds like prison.

Schools are for students, not for parents.

Well, there's always the internet.
Sounds more like parenting to me.

Besides, there are still public libraries and the internet that kids can use to get all of the titillating and overtly sexual information you seem to want children to have access to.
 
hard to say exactly on the age stuff, but "age appropriate" is the guideline here in florida.
Kids are minors, their parents need to know what they are being exposed to in school. It's a no brainer
Granted, my only experience as a parent with public school has been preK and K…but they’d send home permission slips for movies if they had a PG rating.

Also, with the new sex Ed/health curriculum that NJ is implementing, the same district is sending home the lessons and parents will have the option to “opt out”.

With the health/sex Ed it has been a compromise that many districts have taken because some parents were disturbed by what was in the lessons. Alas, the “opt out” - parents who don’t want their child to take that week’s lesson simply opted out.

It calmed the communities down quite a bit (there are still a handful of parents yelling about the curriculum, but most are satisfied)
 
One Nebraska system will require that parents sign permission slips for library books. A Texas system will divide its library into “juvenile,” “young adult” and “adult” sections, with parents choosing the “level” their child can access.
The horror. When I was in school, the library shelves were color coded by grade level and you weren’t allowed to check out anything above your grade level. And there should be some parental oversight since the parents are financially liable for damaged or lost books and fines for late returns.
 
The horror. When I was in school, the library shelves were color coded by grade level and you weren’t allowed to check out anything above your grade level. And there should be some parental oversight since the parents are financially liable for damaged or lost books and fines for late returns.
Gasp. The horror!

Students being allowed to check out age appropriate materials?!

How dare they!
 
Good move. These "books" are nothing but radical left propaganda.
We need to return to the teaching standards of the mid 2000s and before.
I'm fine with doing whatever is legal to remove all of these leftists from influence in our media, publishing, and academia.
 
This seems a reasonable compromise, doesn’t it?

Especially for schools that have a wide age range in the building?

The public high school here goes from 7-12 grade. One elementary school from 4-6

Wouldn’t it make sense that you wouldn’t necessarily want a 4th grader reading some materials more appropriate for 6th graders? Or 7th graders reading materials more appropriate for 11-12th graders?

It does to me. Our elementary schools typically run K-6. The library should be divided into age/grade appropriate materials. I see no issue with that.
 
It does to me. Our elementary schools typically run K-6. The library should be divided into age/grade appropriate materials. I see no issue with that.
Yeah, it strikes me as rather "common sense". But I suppose the saying "common sense is not so common" would apply.
 
Sounds like a good idea. Kids mature at different rates. Parents should decide what is appropriate.
 
And....haven't we heard for YEARS how schools want parental involvement? And how parental involvement is VITAL to student success in school? How many teachers, etc. have complained that parents "don't pay attention" to their children's schooling and aren't involved?

Now...parents paying attention is a bad thing? Parents signing a permission slip for kids to read is a BAD thing? Parents having input into whether they think a material is age appropriate for THEIR child is a bad thing?

Why is that?
 
. . . . . . and teach them to hate the USA -
Well, it makes sense to draw the line somewhere, dont’cha think? Let’s not teach them to hate the USA so much that they promote an insurrectional overthrow of the government, and the installation of an unelected dictator. Just a thought.
 
Republican state repression is kicking into high gear.

"The start of the 2022-2023 school year will usher in a new era of education in some parts of America — one in which school librarians have less freedom to choose books and schoolchildren less ability to read books they find intriguing, experts say.

In the past two years, six states have passed laws that mandate parental involvement in reviewing books, making it easier for parents to remove books or restrict the texts available at school, according to a tally kept by nonprofit EveryLibrary. Five states are considering similar legislation. Typical of these is an Arizona bill, signed by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in April, that requires districts to send parents who ask lists of the books their children check out, as well as to publish the titles of all library materials bought after Jan. 1. Policies are proliferating at the district level, too: One Nebraska system will require that parents sign permission slips for library books. A Texas system will divide its library into “juvenile,” “young adult” and “adult” sections, with parents choosing the “level” their child can access.


“This is a state-sponsored purging of ideas and identities that has no precedent in the United States of America,” said John Chrastka, EveryLibrary’s executive director. “We’re witnessing the silencing of stories and the suppressing of information [that will make] the next generation less able to function in society.”"

Ironically, this 18 year old has most informed and mature insight into the issue:

"...Lily Van Bergen, 18, who graduated from the Bedford system this spring, is worried. She said her hometown is largely White, Christian and conservative. She predicted parental supervision of reading will shrink students’ understanding of the world."

Link
Because that is what R's want...an America with only one mindset. #sad
 
right. because we need to sexualize kids as early as possible and teach them to hate the USA -parents be damned

Tearfully sobbing about kids “learning to hate the US” and “being sexualized” because they are taught actual history instead of whitewashed garbage and aren’t taught that the blatant lie that LGBT people are “sinners” or doing something wrong horrifies conservatives.

Which is another reason you lot hate higher education; it enables kids to learn about the real world and their parents can’t keep them locked in an ideological cage.
 
Republican state repression is kicking into high gear.

"The start of the 2022-2023 school year will usher in a new era of education in some parts of America — one in which school librarians have less freedom to choose books and schoolchildren less ability to read books they find intriguing, experts say.

In the past two years, six states have passed laws that mandate parental involvement in reviewing books, making it easier for parents to remove books or restrict the texts available at school, according to a tally kept by nonprofit EveryLibrary. Five states are considering similar legislation. Typical of these is an Arizona bill, signed by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in April, that requires districts to send parents who ask lists of the books their children check out, as well as to publish the titles of all library materials bought after Jan. 1. Policies are proliferating at the district level, too: One Nebraska system will require that parents sign permission slips for library books. A Texas system will divide its library into “juvenile,” “young adult” and “adult” sections, with parents choosing the “level” their child can access.


“This is a state-sponsored purging of ideas and identities that has no precedent in the United States of America,” said John Chrastka, EveryLibrary’s executive director. “We’re witnessing the silencing of stories and the suppressing of information [that will make] the next generation less able to function in society.”"

Ironically, this 18 year old has most informed and mature insight into the issue:

"...Lily Van Bergen, 18, who graduated from the Bedford system this spring, is worried. She said her hometown is largely White, Christian and conservative. She predicted parental supervision of reading will shrink students’ understanding of the world."

Link
Minors do not have unlimited rights to access whatever they want at the school library, nor are “librarians” given more authority then politicians to decide what content is appropriate
 
Tearfully sobbing about kids “learning to hate the US” and “being sexualized” because they are taught actual history instead of whitewashed garbage and aren’t taught that the blatant lie that LGBT people are “sinners” or doing something wrong horrifies conservatives.

Which is another reason you lot hate higher education; it enables kids to learn about the real world and their parents can’t keep them locked in an ideological cage.
I get the impression you’d be happier in the ideological cage, you seem to roam the forum raging about one thing or another in ways that are neither ideologically consistent nor productive that occurred centuries ago.
 
I get the impression you’d be happier in the ideological cage, you seem to roam the forum raging about one thing or another in ways that are neither ideologically consistent nor productive that occurred centuries ago.

I get the impression you don’t have the slightest clue what you are talking about.....thanks for confirming that 😂
 
Back
Top Bottom