• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:356] Jen Psaki slammed for old homophobic tweet aimed at Lindsey Graham

AJG said:
I've already explained to you why it is outing. I'm sorry if you disagree, but that's the way it is.
Click to expand...

It isn't outing. It's not my fault you don't know what it means to out someone.

Graham was outed by the gay film star. That isn't Psaki.

It isn't her fault that there are people in the country who don't watch the news for over a year and then start weeping over a Tweet she released a long time ago that the smart people already knew what it was about.
 
NewfieMom said:
Since when is that his duty? She repeated it. That's wrong. End of subject...for rational people.
Click to expand...

What the hell are you babbling about? Who is talking about "duty"?

Quote someone else if you want to make stupid posts.
 
tres borrachos said:
What the hell are you babbling about? Who is talking about "duty"?

Quote someone else if you want to make stupid posts.
Click to expand...

I don't babble. I don't make stupid posts. You have been in the wrong, for example suggesting that AJG should "research" who originally cast an aspersion on Lindsey Graham that was later repeated by Jen Psaki as if that excused her, and you are now frustrated. Insulting me does not make your position correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AJG
NewfieMom said:
I don't babble. I don't make stupid posts. You have been in the wrong, for example suggesting that AJG should "research" who originally cast an aspersion on Lindsey Graham that was later repeated by Jen Psaki as if that excused her, and you are now frustrated. Insulting me does not make your position correct.
Click to expand...

So you want a poster to remain ignorant about his own posts where he is claiming that someone "outed" Graham as possibly being gay instead of doing what the smart people do and understanding his own posts. Got it. And weeping about some imagined "insult" to you.

Moving on. I don't waste time on these kinds of posts.
 
tres borrachos said:
So you want a poster to remain ignorant about his own posts where he is claiming that someone "outed" Graham as possibly being gay instead of doing what the smart people do and understanding his own posts. Got it. And weeping about some imagined "insult" to you.

Moving on. I don't waste time on these kinds of posts.
Click to expand...

I weep as well as babble? I had no idea I was so accomplished.
 
tres borrachos said:
It isn't outing. It's not my fault you don't know what it means to out someone.

Graham was outed by the gay film star. That isn't Psaki.

It isn't her fault that there are people in the country who don't watch the news for over a year and then start weeping over a Tweet she released a long time ago that the smart people already knew what it was about.
Click to expand...

Yes, I do know what it means to out someone. For some reason you seem to be believe that because someone can find out that a person is gay from the internet, that disclosing that information without the person's consent is not outing. Well sorry, no where in the definition of outing does it say that. And more importantly, I don't need to know the definition of outing to know that it's wrong.

Let me give another example to demonstrate the point. Suppose a colleague of mine I don't like has something embarrassing floating around the internet they would like to forget. I happen to discover this embarrassing information about my colleague and decide, wouldn't it be just great if I emailed everyone at work about this? I mean a lot of them probably know about it or eventually will anyway since its on the internet, so why not?

Tell me if you think that's wrong and why you think it's so different from what Jen Psaki did.
 
AJG said:
Yes, I do know what it means to out someone. For some reason you seem to be believe that because someone can find out that a person is gay from the internet, that disclosing that information without the person's consent is not outing. Well sorry, no where in the definition of outing does it say that. And more importantly, I don't need to know the definition of outing to know that it's wrong.

Let me give another example to demonstrate the point. Suppose a colleague of mine I don't like has something embarrassing floating around the internet they would like to forget. I happen to discover this embarrassing information about my colleague and decide, wouldn't it be just great if I emailed everyone at work about this? I mean a lot of them probably know about it or eventually will anyway since its on the internet, so why not?

Tell me if you think that's wrong and why you think it's so different from what Jen Psaki did.
Click to expand...

You still don't know what it means to out someone. You think Psaki outed Graham because you didn't pay attention to the same news the smart people did when he was outed by a gay porn star.

If you discover information about a co worker and you email everyone about it, you have outed the coworker.

Get back to me when you understand what it means to out someone.
 
tres borrachos said:
You still don't know what it means to out someone. You think Psaki outed Graham because you didn't pay attention to the same news the smart people did when he was outed by a gay porn star.

If you discover information about a co worker and you email everyone about it, you have outed the coworker.

Get back to me when you understand what it means to out someone.
Click to expand...

OK, @AJG, here's the bottom line. Get back to her when you understand what it means to out someone and next time pay attention to the news to which the smart people are paying attention. That way you won't babble, weep, and write stupid posts like me.

Good luck to you, sir!

NewfieMom
 
  • Like
Reactions: AJG
tres borrachos said:
You still don't know what it means to out someone. You think Psaki outed Graham because you didn't pay attention to the same news the smart people did when he was outed by a gay porn star.

If you discover information about a co worker and you email everyone about it, you have outed the coworker.

Get back to me when you understand what it means to out someone.
Click to expand...

You are deliberately ignoring the points I'm making. Please address this:

For some reason you seem to be believe that because someone can find out that a person is gay from the internet, that disclosing that information without the person's consent is not outing. Well sorry, no where in the definition of outing does it say that.
Click to expand...

Simply stating that I'm wrong doesn't count as debate.
 
AJG said:
You are deliberately ignoring the points I'm making. Please address this:



Simply stating that I'm wrong doesn't count as debate.
Click to expand...

You need to whine to the person who outed Graham. Once again, that isn't Psaki.

Stop whining to me because you don't know who outed Graham.
 
NewfieMom said:
OK, @AJG, here's the bottom line. Get back to her when you understand what it means to out someone and next time pay attention to the news to which the smart people are paying attention. That way you won't babble, weep, and write stupid posts like me.

Good luck to you, sir!

NewfieMom
Click to expand...

Why are you quoting me again and weeping like a baby? Your posts are stupid. Didn't I already tell you that? And I made you so upset here you are again begging for my attention? You had to quote me twice?

Go away. If I wanted to read stupid whiny posts I wouldn't be here. I'd be on a third grade homeroom board.
 
AJG said:
It's outing because:
  1. It's new knowledge to me and other people. The point of putting it on social media is to make as many people aware of it as possible.
  2. It was done without his consent.
Click to expand...

It's knowledge to Lindsey Graham too. When once again the rumors were going around last summer he answered to them.
He said he isn't Gay. IOW, it's none of anyone's business what is his sexual preference.

So much for the compassion of leftists who are intent on spreading baseless rumor instead of believing Graham. Graham might very well be Gay, but why should leftists drag him out of the closet? I thought the woke objected to bullying homosexuals...

I guess not.
 
Someone stated Aunt Antifa is a "liberal". There is nothing liberal about BLM or Antifa as far as I can tell and Aunt Anifa appears to be no exception. Both Antifa and BLM are opposed America's founding principles as far as I can tell. Neither values treating people based on merit and the content of their character but rather based on their race, ethnicity, or gender identity. Nothing liberal about that. Indeed, as far as I can tell BLM and Antifa are Marxist inspired leftists or communists IMO.
 
RealityChecker said:
Someone stated Aunt Antifa is a "liberal". There is nothing liberal about BLM or Antifa as far as I can tell and Aunt Anifa appears to be no exception. Both Antifa and BLM are opposed America's founding principles as far as I can tell. Neither values treating people based on merit and the content of their character but rather based on their race, ethnicity, or gender identity. Nothing liberal about that. Indeed, as far as I can tell BLM and Antifa are Marxist inspired leftists or communists IMO.
Click to expand...
Is there a reason you suddenly tacked this comment onto a thread about an entirely different matter? This is a very old thread and when it was active, no one was discussing any of the topics you addressed in your posting today. You seem a little lost.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom