[W: #1262] Trump lawyers to use ‘conflict of interest’ between judge, Carroll’s attorney in appeal of $83.3M jury verdict: ‘Insane’

[The AntiDonald]

In a civil case the bar is set lower. Add to that equation the demographic of the jury pool and guilt is pretty much a foregone conclusion. Set the trial in a predominantly Republican district and the outcome would most likely be different.

Then you should advise your hero to go to Tennessee or W. VA to commit his crimes. He was tried by a jury of his peers from 4 different counties around NYC.

With only one black man and two women on the jury. He had an advantage right there.

 

[jpevans]

I once heard Trump say he's smarter than the lawyers.

Sometimes it looks like that is his criteria for hiring them.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Then you should advise your hero to go to Tennessee or W. VA to commit his crimes. He was tried by a jury of his peers from 4 different counties around NYC.

With only one black man and two women on the jury. He had an advantage right there.

Yup and much of the jury did not have a college education. That is Trump’s core demographic.

 

[Overitall]

Then you should advise your hero to go to Tennessee or W. VA to commit his crimes. He was tried by a jury of his peers from 4 different counties around NYC.

With only one black man and two women on the jury. He had an advantage right there.

A jury of his peers? What's that even mean when the demographics are predominantly stacked against you?

 

[Slartibartfast]

A jury of his peers? What's that even mean when the demographics are predominantly stacked against you?

The jury was mostly white, male, and not college educated. That’s pretty much the profile of a typical Trump voter.

 

[Superfly]

OK, but she will (likely) get paid (by Trump) for the appeal effort, regardless of its outcome.

Right. Because he’s so good at paying his lawyers.

 

[Overitall]

The jury was mostly white, male, and not college educated. That’s pretty much the profile of a typical Trump voter.

You're playing the race card. Dismissed.

 

[Slartibartfast]

You're playing the race card. Dismissed.

You were the one to complain about demographics. Perhaps next time you bring up an issue, you should know a little about it ahead of time.

 

[Overitall]

You were the one to complain about demographics. Perhaps next time you bring up an issue, you should know a little about it ahead of time.

I presented a point, which you continue to deflect away from.

Enjoy the rest of your day.

 

[Superfly]

Trump already stated he plans on appealing. Until that has ran its course Carroll gets nothing.

He still … has … to … pay.

It just goes into an escrow account.

How many times does this have to be explained to you?

 

[The AntiDonald]

A jury of his peers? What's that even mean when the demographics are predominantly stacked against you?

It means 'If you can't do the time, don't do the crime'. This is how it works all across our criminal court systems. How does Trump actually think it works? Do a crime in NYC and get tried in Wyoming? That's not how it works. Trump was given the same due process afforded any other litigant. The jury found him liable.

Case closed.

If Trump was so worried about the demographics at his upcoming trial, why didn't he settle or at least attempt to? He was happy to make this whole charade political and get all that free airtime. It's how he rolls. But I'll tell you this much, he just lost a whole lot of suburban female voters.

 

[Slartibartfast]

I presented a point, which you continue to deflect away from.

Enjoy the rest of your day.

Then state your point clearly. Right now I am seeing complaints about demographics and venue. Both of which have been addressed.

 

[Superfly]

Didn't Trump say he never met the woman and that she's not his type?

Yes and there’s a picture of him standing right beside her.

 

[Overitall]

He still … has … to … pay.

It just goes into an escrow account.

How many times does this have to be explained to you?

How many times you gonna repeat what I already know?

 

[Airyaman]

Yes and there’s a picture of him standing right beside her.

That's not the part that matters...when presented the photo, he thought she was his 2nd wife, Marla Maples. So unless Marla wasn't his type...

 

[Superfly]

How many times you gonna repeat what I already know?

Then why do you keep yammering about appeals and how she won’t get paid?

The point of punitive is punishment. He has to let go of $83 million addition dollars to be held in escrow if he decides to appeal. He still loses that money.

This has been repeatedly explained to you. You’re still yammering.

It has also been repeatedly explained to you that you can’t appeal, just because you don’t like the verdict. There had to be a valid reason to appeal. There isn’t one. Yet you keep yammering.

Any question you might have about this process has been repeatedly answered in this thread, yet you keep yammering.

Maybe you should just stop yammering, and listen to people who clearly know more about this than you.

 

[Superfly]

That's not the part that matters...when presented the photo, he thought she was his 2nd wife, Marla Maples. So unless Marla wasn't his type...

Yeah - that’s the craziest part.

 

[jpevans]

Her word against his, type of world.

Why do you claim that the pos claimed having an affair with ms. Carroll? Maybe he should have testified for himself. Although I'm thinking that your ignorance of the case forced you to make that shit up.

 

[ModernDiogenes]

Wow!! This is so insane! Do you think it's going to work?

You can never be fully sure but if the “mentor” part turns out to be either total BS or just the name partner/associate in name only sort of thing (partners are ‘mentors of their flock of fledglings’) it ought to not have legs. Doesn’t mean it won’t get a hearing though.

 

[Overitall]

Why do you claim that the pos claimed having an affair with ms. Carroll? Maybe he should have testified for himself. Although I'm thinking that your ignorance of the case forced you to make that shit up.

Enjoy the rest of your day.

 

[snakestretcher]

I once heard Trump say he's smarter than the lawyers.

He's smarter than everyone, didn't you hear? Clinicians, lawyers, the military; Trump owns them all when it comes to knowing everything about anything. He's a "very stable genius". Yep.

 

[Overitall]

Then why do you keep yammering about appeals and how she won’t get paid?

Strawman. When did I say she wouldn't get paid?

The point of punitive is punishment. He has to let go of $83 million addition dollars to be held in escrow if he decides to appeal. He still loses that money.

This has been repeatedly explained to you. You’re still yammering.

It has also been repeatedly explained to you that you can’t appeal, just because you don’t like the verdict. There had to be a valid reason to appeal. There isn’t one. Yet you keep yammering.

Any question you might have about this process has been repeatedly answered in this thread, yet you keep yammering.

Maybe you should just stop yammering, and listen to people who clearly know more about this than you.

Personal attack noted.

 

[NuffSaid]

Her word against his, type of world.

Funny, he had an opportunity to defend "his word" against hers.
He decided it was more convenient to not even show up.
Therefore, his word is useless now.

 

[Overitall]

Funny, he had an opportunity to defend "his word" against hers.
He decided it was more convenient to not even show up.
Therefore, his word is useless now.

This has been covered multiple times. Enjoy the rest of your day.

 

[NuffSaid]

This has been covered multiple times. Enjoy the rest of your day.

It has, just don't use the term "affair".
It wasn't that.
He sexually assaulted her.