- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 32,061
- Reaction score
- 21,046
- Location
- East Coast - USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Why is that so hard for SOME people to understand?
Why is that so hard for SOME people to understand?
Why is that so hard for SOME people to understand?
I get it, actually. If you believe that abortion is the murder of a baby it's sort of hard to be pro-choice about it. The analogy would be like me supporting your right to fire nuns out of cannons, but I just wouldn't do it myself.
Abortions different than shooting a nun out of a cannon though. There's two rights at stake and either way you are going to be trampling on one to protect the rights of the other. I don't think legally you should be able to force someone to keep a living growing human attached to them and feeding off of them for any period of time but I do think ending that life is wrong. Instead of going about it by forcing them to keep the human alive until viability I think we need to work on changing societal views, that and providing incentives for the woman to carry to term.
I get it, actually. If you believe that abortion is the murder of a baby it's sort of hard to be pro-choice about it. The analogy would be like me supporting your right to fire nuns out of cannons, but I just wouldn't do it myself.
I'd compare it more to living with your girlfriend before marriage. Some people are against it, but it's still legal.
I didn't come here to debate abortion. I was just saying that...IF...you believe that abortion is the murder of a baby, then being pro-choice is understandably a hard pill to swallow.
I understand it perfectly. The first describes you position on policy, that there should be a choice, and the second describes the choice you would likely make for yourself.Why is that so hard for SOME people to understand?
I think the level of perceived offense is rather different.
By the way, I don't know if this matters at all, but I'm pro-choice for the record.
I understand it perfectly. The first describes you position on policy, that there should be a choice, and the second describes the choice you would likely make for yourself.
Thing is, to pro-life, what choice you would make for yourself doesn't matter, because no choice should be available at all. That's what "Pro-Choice - Personally Pro-Life" folks have a hard time understanding.
When you don't think someone should have a right, that right is easy to disrespect, just like pro-choice disrespect the unborn's right to life.I do understand that about pro-life people. What I dont understand is how they can minimize and disrespect women's basic rights so much when they do so.
Well, I can....many just look at women who get pregnant and are prepared to be as sluts or loose women that deserve to be punished with the consequences of their actions. Which is even more sickening and disrespectful.
When you don't think someone should have a right, that right is easy to disrespect, just like pro-choice disrespect the unborn's right to life.
Roe was a ruling about a man's right to practice medicine as he saw fit, not about a woman's right to abortion.Thankfully SCOTUS has ruled in our favor at least.
Abortions different than shooting a nun out of a cannon though. There's two rights at stake and either way you are going to be trampling on one to protect the rights of the other. I don't think legally you should be able to force someone to keep a living growing human attached to them and feeding off of them for any period of time but I do think ending that life is wrong. Instead of going about it by forcing them to keep the human alive until viability I think we need to work on changing societal views, that and providing incentives for the woman to carry to term.
Roe was a ruling about a man's right to practice medicine as he saw fit, not about a woman's right to abortion.
Why Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hates Roe v. Wade
That's a fairly desperate and pathetic attempt to recover from a threat which was never there.It was about a woman's right to privacy, specifically between her and her doctor but thank you for proving my point.
That's a fairly desperate and pathetic attempt to recover from a threat which was never there.
I didn't come here to debate abortion. I was just saying that...IF...you believe that abortion is the murder of a baby, then being pro-choice is understandably a hard pill to swallow.
this is the fact some will never admit
I don't think it is - a lot of people side with pro-choice but opt for abortions and support pro-choice rulings in private (well - secret - rather).
But that's what choice is...right?