The only thing this demonstrates is that the term "trimester" is abstract to many and suggestion that "legalize" with "abortion" is pro-choice, and students do not know much else. This video is mostly useless.
I guarantee you I can create a fake petition about an issue I know a lot about, fill it with suggestion to an ignorant audience and get similar results. It will be even better than that. It would end up looking like Borat or something with folks cheering for things knowiingly that they are illegal.
Several students at George Mason University (GMU) signed a petition on Wednesday demanding lawmakers legalize “fourth trimester” abortions.
The petition, which was circulated on GMU’s flagship campus in Fairfax, VA., just outside Washington D.C., by Media Research Center reporter Dan Joseph said it was aimed at sending “a message to our lawmakers that women have the right to choose what to do with their bodies and babies” even “after their pregnancies.”
The only thing this demonstrates is that the term "trimester" is abstract to many and suggestion that "legalize" with "abortion" is pro-choice, and students do not know much else. This video is mostly useless.
I guarantee you I can create a fake petition about an issue I know a lot about, fill it with suggestion to an ignorant audience and get similar results. It will be even better than that. It would end up looking like Borat or something with folks cheering for things knowiingly that they are illegal.
Well, according to the radical pro-choice side, if it's still attached to the woman, it's not human.
I'll bet you could too. Still, it's sad to think that university students can be unfamiliar with "tri" or so credulous.
That people would sign such a petition points to how serious the over-population problem has become.
Over-population facilitates hierarchical dog-eat-dog socioeconomic systems.
To succeed in such systems, one must be free from encumbrances that place a handicapping burden on one's free ability to compete.
A child, let alone a child with health problems, is such a handicapping burden.
Women fear being relegated to lower socioeconomic status than they're compelled to want.
The OP petition reference is simply a manifestation of that concern.
So the problem isn't one of abortion, but one of socioeconomics and geopolitics.
We need to solve our over-population problem which has many manifestations, and that will automatically reduce the compulsion for dog-eat-dog neurotic coping mechanisms.
I'm not sure that kids who are so clueless should be counted as either "for" or "against" anything, sigh.
I think it's no stretch for some of these people to actually support infanticide. There's some sick puppies in the pro-abort camp. "Adoption is evil" after all, and why shouldn't there be a 3 month baby trial period?
It's even logically consistent with their belief in restricting personhood; a 3 month old human is somewhat sentient but not sapient, there are smarter animals we own, put in zoos, kill for food. Never mind that said animals never become sapient, but birth? Birth is arbitrary; nothing special about birth.
I think its no stretch for people in the prolife camp to support infanticide. In fact, many have indicated they are fine with it, provided it is after birth or when the child may become a liability to a man.
I think it's no stretch for some of these people to actually support infanticide. There's some sick puppies in the pro-abort camp. "Adoption is evil" after all, and why shouldn't there be a 3 month baby trial period?
It's even logically consistent with their belief in restricting personhood; a 3 month old human is somewhat sentient but not sapient, there are smarter animals we own, put in zoos, kill for food. Never mind that said animals never become sapient, but birth? Birth is arbitrary; nothing special about birth.
Reminds me of the skit on the man show when they took to the beach in California to get women to sign a petition to end womens suffrage
and we allow these clueless kids to vote
I really don't understand why so many prolifers believe lying is persuasive. Rather, it proves they have to lie to believe they made a point.
Another nonsensical JayDubya post of a lying message predictably supporting a lying OP.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?