The Giant Noodle
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2010
- Messages
- 7,332
- Reaction score
- 2,011
- Location
- Northern Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
except they need to die. All of them.
no ...why you carry all this hateness in your heart ?
these men are punishing a woman who was a prostitute ,so by punishing all prostitutes they keep their community clean from AIDS
so what if this prostitute didn't have AIDS, or any type of STD, what if the sole reason she was prostituting was so she could have money?
In a misogynistic society that treats women at the same level as animals, that denies them basic human rights.
Why should this woman be denied an income?
Why did she have to be killed in one of the most barbaric and archaic forms on punishment in the world?
no ...why you carry all this hateness in your heart ?
these men are punishing a woman who was a prostitute ,so by punishing all prostitutes they keep their community clean from AIDS which is endemic in your country America
see below the figure :
Since the beginning of the HIV and AIDS epidemic well over half a million people have died of AIDS in America1 – the equivalent of the entire population of Las Vegas. There are currently more than one million people living with HIV and AIDS in America and around a fifth of these are unaware of their infection,2 posing a high risk of onward transmission.
America’s response to the AIDS epidemic has produced mixed results. HIV prevention efforts have not always been successful and every year approximately 56,000 Americans are infected with HIV.3 In March 2009 Washington DC reported an HIV prevalence of at least 3% among people over 12 years - similar to rates in some parts of sub-Saharan Africa.4
Despite the seriousness of the epidemic, particularly in certain geographic areas and among certain demographic groups, America lacked a comprehensive plan on AIDS until 2010. President Obama had promised to rectify this during his election campaign by committing to the creation of a National HIV/AIDS Strategy. The Strategy, which was launched in July 2010, is structured around three core aims: reducing new HIV infections, increasing access to care and improving health outcomes for people living with HIV, and reducing HIV-related disparities and health inequities.HIV and AIDS in America
no ...why you carry all this hateness in your heart ?
no ...why you carry all this hateness in your heart ?
these men are punishing a woman who was a prostitute ,so by punishing all prostitutes they keep their community clean from AIDS which is endemic in your country America
see below the figure :
Since the beginning of the HIV and AIDS epidemic well over half a million people have died of AIDS in America1 – the equivalent of the entire population of Las Vegas. There are currently more than one million people living with HIV and AIDS in America and around a fifth of these are unaware of their infection,2 posing a high risk of onward transmission.
America’s response to the AIDS epidemic has produced mixed results. HIV prevention efforts have not always been successful and every year approximately 56,000 Americans are infected with HIV.3 In March 2009 Washington DC reported an HIV prevalence of at least 3% among people over 12 years - similar to rates in some parts of sub-Saharan Africa.4
Despite the seriousness of the epidemic, particularly in certain geographic areas and among certain demographic groups, America lacked a comprehensive plan on AIDS until 2010. President Obama had promised to rectify this during his election campaign by committing to the creation of a National HIV/AIDS Strategy. The Strategy, which was launched in July 2010, is structured around three core aims: reducing new HIV infections, increasing access to care and improving health outcomes for people living with HIV, and reducing HIV-related disparities and health inequities.HIV and AIDS in America
Prostitution is not a legal job ,it is a crime in the clean societies that respect human relatioships but in animal societies where every maqn can have sex with every woman he wnts it is a job.
By punishing illegal sex-acting members (women or men ) .they keep their society clean from many disasters ( eg. AIDS ,STD ,illegal Babies .......)
no she has the complete right to deny if she is innocent she will not be punished ,but if at least four witneses say with swear that they saw her acting sex with a man frankly .and if she was married and did sex with other men she will be punished by stoning .but if she was not married she will be punished by whipping only .
if she was a poor and need money then she should be helped and not punished .
lesbians and pornos who act sex with cameras demonstrating every thing and showing it on the web in America is the real barbaric and dirtiest behaviors .while keeping societies from illegal sex by any means is justified .
think deeply with the real consequencies of sex when left illegally spread in the world .
You might as well argue with a rock than try and convince an atheist that free sex/promiscuous behavior has negative social consequences. Consequences of social philosophy seem to be lost on the modern hedonist (atheist) movement; you will be torn apart to suggest such an obvious and logical thing.... you are potentially hampering their ability to "live it up, since this is the only live you have".
That said, "you who is without sin cast the first stone", stoning anyone for anything is insanity.
What?
And people who believe in Christ don't have sex before marriage? Teen Christian girls don't get pregnant? They don't get abortions?
Hah!
You know what else has negative social-ramifications? Religious people who've gone extremist.
So you are going to point out that there are hypocrites who are also Christians?
Thanks for enlightening me, I have to re-evaluate my entire thought process. I think that if you were being honest you would acknowledge that we are all hypocrites, everyone has said something and done something else, everyone. That doesn't mean we should stop talking about morality, or having high standards, even if we don't meet them 100% of the time.
Alternatively, you could respond to what I said....
At least atheists of yore (Nietzsche) had philosophical arguments...all I can get out of the modern atheist is "don't tell me what I can and can't do" or "you are a hypocrite".
Believe in God/don't believe in God, irrelevant to me; what is relevant are the social implications of the various philosophies.
Also: you think it is extremist to suggest that sex before marriage is wrong?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?