- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I am asking you, as apparently you think it is to include it.
I am asking you, as apparently you think it is to include it.Was it?
Moral of the story is, if you are black and value your life. Don't run from the cops. If you are a cop and value your life and career. Don't shoot blacks under any circumstances.
No it is not.
Black folks have been screaming over false scenarios.
Moral of the story is, if you are black and value your life. Don't run from the cops.
If you are a cop and value your life and career. Don't shoot blacks under any circumstances.
Moral of the story is, if you are black and value your life. Don't run from the cops. If you are a cop and value your life and career. Don't shoot blacks under any circumstances.
I don't care how reamed I get for saying this. The far left uses the black men killed at the hand of police officers as pawns in their keyboard attacks on anyone they see as the "right wing".
The fact that this man was black is irrelevant. I don't usually rush to say disparaging things about cops, but in this situation, it's pretty clear what happened, and IMO the cop was in the wrong here. He deserves to be brought up on charges.
No cop is trained to stand there and shoot people in the back as they flee.
Moral of the story is, a police officer can straight up murder a person and someone out there will defend it. If the victim was black.
You make no sense.No, but based on your assertions, it's apparent that you've been listening exclusively to this screamer. . .
Wow
based off the video this Cop is guilty
You make no sense.
It was kind of hard missing your screams.
:doh And yet it was you doing the screaming with nonsense. Go figure.It may be hard for you to hear anything else since your teacher (pictured below) is so loud
That you think you would be criticized for speaking the obvious truth demonstrates again how the far left have been able to control the media and the conversation between people. You feel you would be 'reamed' not because your point of view doesn't contradict the facts but because, unless you take their far left view, you are a bigot, racist, fascist, and so on. This the language they speak and their fallback position when the facts don't gibe with their feelings.I don't care how reamed I get for saying this. The far left uses the black men killed at the hand of police officers as pawns in their keyboard attacks on anyone they see as the "right wing".
The fact that this man was black is irrelevant. I don't usually rush to say disparaging things about cops, but in this situation, it's pretty clear what happened, and IMO the cop was in the wrong here. He deserves to be brought up on charges.
Are they? Do you have a source for this 'pretty sure' feeling of yours?I'm pretty sure cops are trained to say "he reached for my gun", as this cop did.
The simplest way to bring closure to this horrific incident is for the DOJ to launch an investigation into police abuse by SC cops (which it's already done), and then, to threaten to sue the police dept. for $100 - $200 million* unless municipalities convict all murdering cops, including the scum---- in this incident.
* this is a perfectly reasonable amount considering the no. of cases of police misconduct the DOJ will uncover in the course of its investigation.
Are they? Do you have a source for this 'pretty sure' feeling of yours?
Show me once where I have.If it doesn't justify it, why are you using it as a justification?
Show me once where I have excused the shooting. That doesnt negate the facts and the facts provide context. Context...not justification. If you arent smart enough to understand the difference...well...that explains a lot.No it's not wrong. It all started because of a broken taillight.
And you are sounding like someone who's trying very hard to look for excuses for this cop. He then ran huh? That should tell us all we need to know here. The guy was 20 feet from the cop, and running away from the cop when the cop started shooting! The officer was in no way in danger.
Anyway I'm not going to get into a pissing contest about the specifics in this case. The fact is we have a much bigger problem in this country. Many cops have a shoot 1st and ask questions later attitude towards their jobs. And something needs to be done.
So you arent smart enough to understand the difference between context and justification either, huh?Funny, but I was unaware that having warrants and running requires immediate execution.
I have not yet seen anything in the OH Revised Code indicating that immediate execution is an accepted action for these - I'll bet that SC law is the same.
At best, running from a cop is a misdemeanor charge that must be charged, and requires a court of law to decide guilt or innocence.
At the time of the shooting, Scott was an innocent man, and should have been treated as such.
:doh And yet it was you doing the screaming with nonsense.
In an unusual turnaround, prosecutors late last year filed a spate of charges for use of excessive force against three white officers in the shootings of black drivers. Only one went to trial but resulted in a hung jury.
Read more here: EXCLUSIVE: SC officers exonerated in more than 200 shootings | The State The State
Its refreshing to see reason from someone not invested in 'cause'.My first point deals with that possibility (and I suspect that the object was, in fact, the Taser). I also noted, "The officer's perceptions...among other factors, might lead to some mitigation of the charges, but it is difficult to imagine a scenario under which the officer would be exonerated." The officer's actions afterward almost certainly have hurt his case and increased prospects of conviction on a more serious charge. I could be wrong, but we'll see what happens when or if the case is heard, as a plea bargain is a possibility. A plea bargain might provide the officer his best chance at a reduced sentence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?