Including unjustified complacency where the FBI and CIA are concerned - the point of the article.
You're just pushing propaganda. Are you here to make a concise, easily debated (in terms of breadth) claim?
Or did you just post Glenn's propaganda piece, based on William's email to MSNBC (bye cruel world)? Ooh, ooh, I know the answer!
Your post is worse than MSNBC, it's a thoughtless regurgitation of someone writing an opinion about someone else's opinion, with no clear debate topic spelled out by you personally.
The fact is, MSNBC is reporting on matters of national security, counterintelligence, the FBI, etc., because the president of the UNited States appeared to trigger the FBI and counter-intelligence tripwires, and put himself almost deliberately, into the cross-hairs of the biggest ongoing federal investigation of a sitting president in history.
That they get experts from those fields, is EXACTLY what they should do.
Have you watched the guests Glenn rambles on about? Chuck Rosenberg? He's beloved because he's measured, knows his stuff and is an expert on the matters.
It's *common* for the host to be whipped up into a frenzy about how damning certain evidence is against Trump, and the career prosecutor types of which Chuck is just one (the best), the career prosecutors wind it DOWN. They say you have to be careful because if we don't know, we don't know. That investigators have to be cautious, and thorough. That Mueller knows more than we do, and that most of what we'd do beyond what we're told, is guess-work.
And the coup de grace, he's bitching IN A VACUUM.
If he had a clue, he'd compare and contrast the gust/experts on MSNBC's top shows, vs those of Fox (Hannity and Tucker), and even CNN.
Uh oh, the second you do that, Fox looks like an extension of the White House, and MSNBC looks like the fair and impartial adults in the room.
