- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 57,470
- Reaction score
- 14,587
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
It was not the article to which I was responding, but to statements I took as yours, which, upon further study, were not yours. I sincerely apologize for the errant confusion and hope to have sensible exchanges, on my part, in the future.
i posted an article that supported what i said. so what in the article is wrong?
since you can't point that out and have refused 3 times to do so.
then you have 0 argument again what i said.