• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

US doesn’t have enough tanks to send Ukraine, Pentagon admits

Which would require attacking Russia in the first place.

They are about as awful as any other superpower, including the United States.

So you are moving from invasion to merely attacking.

As far as your second bit, that is just silly. If you are simply a silly person, I will keep that in mind.
 




What the Biden administration is saying here is that the Pentagon can't find 31 operational US M1A2 tanks anywhere on this globe for Ukraine.

If this is true (I believe it is a lie), then Gen. Miley should be sacked today. So the Abrams tanks for Ukraine will have to be built from scratch by General Dynamics.

The GD Abrams plant in Lima, Ohio can churn out 12 M1A2 tanks per month and the plant is currently working on fulfilling a contract of 250 M1A2 tanks for Poland.

The plant must also sandwich in some training tanks for Taiwan (buying 108 M1A2 tanks).

Do the math. It may take years for GD to manufacture the 31 US Abrams tanks Biden promised Ukraine.
Honestly, I believe the problem is hat they don't have 31 tanks IN EXCESS OF REQUIREMENTS they can readily access. Most are likely committed to support various Op Plans and Orders and for contingency support.
 
This desperate need to pretend everyone is “the new Hitler” is moronic. Russia has neither the available resources nor interest in “taking the world down” when they are still bogged down in Ukraine.
Neither did Hitler have the means. Logic and sanity are not benchmarks for leadership in Russia... :unsure:

Only a Putin Poodle will say WWIII can only be started if the West invades Russia. Russia invaded the Ukraine using as flimsy an excuse as Germany did to invade Poland. Sad the victors over Germany couldn't pull off their massive invasion of a very weak neighbor. Embarrassing to say the least and Putin's pride is not to be discounted... ✌️
 
So you are moving from invasion to merely attacking.

As far as your second bit, that is just silly. If you are simply a silly person, I will keep that in mind.

It’s not “merely” anything. It would require strikes on Russia territory, and presumably an invasion of Kaliningrad at a minimum.

You not liking the facts doesn’t change them.
 
Neither did Hitler have the means. Logic and sanity are not benchmarks for leadership in Russia... :unsure:

Only a Putin Poodle will say WWIII can only be started if the West invades Russia. Russia invaded the Ukraine using as flimsy an excuse as Germany did to invade Poland. Sad the victors over Germany couldn't pull off their massive invasion of a very weak neighbor. Embarrassing to say the least and Putin's pride is not to be discounted... ✌️

Given America’s actions the last twenty years in particular, accusing other countries of “lacking logic and sanity”.

By your “logic”, that makes the US “the next Hitler” because we invaded Iraq on such a flimsy excuse and failed to achieve victory over a “very weak opponent”.

Do you seriously not grasp how ridiculous your desperate attempts to make that fairy tale work sound?
 
It’s not “merely” anything. It would require strikes on Russia territory, and presumably an invasion of Kaliningrad at a minimum.

If that is the case, there is nothing to worry about. There will be no invasion and there are already strikes on Russian territory. That is war.

You not liking the facts doesn’t change them.

You being silly doesn't change the facts, either.
 
By your “logic”, that makes the US “the next Hitler” because we invaded Iraq on such a flimsy excuse and failed to achieve victory over a “very weak opponent”.

Which bits of Iraq did we annex and say were part of the United States now?
 
Which bits of Iraq did we annex?

Does attacking another country under flimsy pretenses in a blatant display of imperialism magically become okay because we didn’t annex them?
 
If that is the case, there is nothing to worry about. There will be no invasion and there are already strikes on Russian territory. That is war.



You being silly doesn't change the facts, either.

The US Air Force is bombing Russia? When did that start?

The facts are that their behavior is no different than that of any other superpower in a war in which the other side didn’t just roll over.
 
Maybe the Pentagon could ask UP where they parked this lot?
Skip to 3 min for the train!

 
Does attacking another country under flimsy pretenses in a blatant display of imperialism magically become okay because we didn’t annex them?

So they are not the same. I am usually hesitant to engage with someone who cannot stay on topic and needs to whatabout their way out of addressing the issue but thought I would give it a shot.

We are making progress!
 
The facts are that their behavior is no different than that of any other superpower in a war in which the other side didn’t just roll over.

First you say they are too weak to be a threat outside of Ukraine and then you say Russia is a superpower.

Pick a lane. Jeez.
 
So they are not the same. I am usually hesitant to engage with someone who cannot stay on topic and needs to whatabout their way out of addressing the issue but thought I would give it a shot.

We are making progress!

So, blatant wars of aggression don’t magically become okay just because the US technically didn’t annex the country in question, no matter how much that triggers those who see Russians as subhuman.
 
So, blatant wars of aggression don’t magically become okay just because the US technically didn’t annex the country in question, no matter how much that triggers those who see Russians as subhuman.

Still whatabouting? Can't address the issue?

Too bad, I suppose. Maybe next time you will be able to focus.
 
First you say they are too weak to be a threat outside of Ukraine and then you say Russia is a superpower.

Pick a lane. Jeez.

Oh, it absolutely is a superpower.

And their behavior is no different than our own in Iraq, no matter how much that triggers you.

Facts of the matter is that the only way this war escalates into world war three is if the US decides to attack Russia.
 
Still whatabouting? Can't address the issue?

Too bad, I suppose. Maybe next time you will be able to focus.

Oh, I’m entirely focused. I’ve already throughly demonstrated how the “next Hitler” shrieks are moronic drivel, after all.
 
Okay. Then they are definitely a threat to Europe. Glad we cleared that up.

Maybe in a fantasy world.

In the real one only an idiot thinks they are about to invade all of Europe while still busy in Ukraine.
 
Maybe in a fantasy world.

In the real one only an idiot thinks they are about to invade all of Europe while still busy in Ukraine.

So they would be a threat after they conquer Ukraine.

You make a good argument to stop them in Ukraine.
 
So they would invade after they conquer Ukraine.

You make a good argument to stop them in Ukraine.
Again, maybe in a fantasy world. The endless hysterical fearmongering about “the Russian hordes” is flat out pathetic.

Good luck “stooping” anything when America glows in the dark thanks to you starting world war three.
 
Again, maybe in a fantasy world. The endless hysterical fearmongering about “the Russian hordes” is flat out pathetic.

You are really all over the place. You are borderline incoherent. They are a superpower but not a threat because they currently are engaged with Ukraine. After an appeasement by the so-called West, or a military defeat if Ukraine, they would suddenly start respecting borders. We can just trust them.

Good luck “stooping” anything when America glows in the dark thanks to you starting world war three.

Thanks, Ivan!
 
You are really all over the place. You are borderline incoherent. They are a superpower but not a threat because they currently are engaged with Ukraine. After an appeasement by the so-called West, or a military defeat if Ukraine, they would suddenly start respecting borders. We can just trust them.



Thanks, Ivan!

Here’s a hint: your argument is like arguing the US was going to invade the entirety of the Middle East when it was still busy in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s completely ridiculous drivel 😂

You desperately wanting the US to go to war with Russia doesn’t change reality, no matter how much you whine.
 
Here’s a hint: your argument is like arguing the US was going to invade the entirety of the Middle East when it was still busy in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s completely ridiculous drivel 😂

I bet the Iranians weren't worried at all.

You desperately wanting the US to go to war with Russia doesn’t change reality, no matter how much you whine.

I don't want that at all. I want Russia to leave Ukraine.

What do you want?
 
I bet the Iranians weren't worried at all.



I don't want that at all. I want Russia to leave Ukraine.

What do you want?

I want warmongers like you to crawl back into their holes instead of desperately grasping for any excuse to start world war three.
 
I want warmongers like you to crawl back into their holes instead of desperately grasping for any excuse to start world war three.

So you want Everyone to surrender to Russia.

Unsurprising.
 
Back
Top Bottom