Dude, really - that's your answer??
Courts are not allowed to break the law any more than you or I.
If a Lower Court, State Court, or Federal Court disregards or misapplies the law, it is appealable thru the higher courts ending at the Supreme Court.
If all the courts abet lawlessness - which is what the PA court rulings were - then by definition we no longer live under the rule of law.
The PA courts AND the Supreme Court disregarded the law for politics, and we all lose in that.
The PA court ruled that ballots could be counted that did not meet the statutory requirements - nobody disputes that.
Those ballots, those illegal ballots, are what gave Pennsylvania to Biden - and that is before you ever start to look at whether they were even authentic.
Wisconsin - same thing.
Even if you were correct, and there is no evidence that you are. Give it up, stop feeding "the big lie." Follow the example of
the democrats after the 1968 candidate Nixon sabotage of the Paris peace talks, William Casey's 1980 election, October Surprise,
and Bush's brother's influence on suppressing the Gore vote in Florida in 2000. You have nothing to gain from your tactics.
Warning that our real danger would come from a domestic despot,
"It is to deny what the history of the world tells us is true, to suppose that men of ambition and talents will not continue to spring up amongst us. And when they do, they will as naturally seek the gratification of their ruling passion as others have done before them. The question then is, can that gratification be found in supporting and maintaining an edifice that has been erected by others? Most certainly it cannot. Many great and good men, sufficiently qualified for any task they should undertake, may ever be found whose ambition would aspire to nothing beyond a seat in
Congress, a
gubernatorial or a
presidential chair; but such belong not to the family of the lion or the tribe of the eagle. What! think you these places would satisfy an
Alexander, a
Caesar, or a
Napoleon? Never! Towering genius disdains a beaten path. It seeks regions hitherto unexplored. It sees no distinction in adding story to story upon the monuments of fame erected to the memory of others. It denies that it is glory enough to serve under any chief. It scorns to tread in the footsteps of any predecessor, however illustrious. It thirsts and burns for distinction; and if possible, it will have it, whether at the expense of emancipating slaves
or enslaving freemen. Is it unreasonable, then, to expect that some man possessed of the loftiest genius, coupled with ambition sufficient to push it to its utmost stretch, will at some time spring up among us? And when such a one does, it will require the people to be united with each other, attached to the government and laws, and generally intelligent, to successfully frustrate his designs. Distinction will be his paramount object, and although he would as willingly, perhaps more so, acquire it by doing good as harm, yet, that opportunity being past, and nothing left to be done in the way of building up,
he would set boldly to the task of pulling down."
A. Lincoln
The POTUS personally sabotaged the ability of the U.S. Postal Service to deliver the ballots to be counted, compared
to if he had not interfered for that purpose.
".. A letter from the U.S. Postal Service general counsel stated that Pennsylvania ballots requested near Oct. 27 might not be returned by Election Day.
Pennsylvania’s Election Code deadline for receiving mail and absentee ballots is 8 p.m. on election day. However, the Pennsylvania Constitution requires that “all aspects of the electoral process, to the greatest degree possible, be kept open and unrestricted to the voters of our Commonwealth, and, also, conducted in a manner which guarantees, to the greatest degree possible, a voter’s right to equal participation in the electoral process for the selection of his or her representatives in government.” Relying on this language in the Pennsylvania Constitution, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended the deadline to count ballots by three days to “reduce voter disenfranchisement.”.."