• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

United states to become a constitution carry majority nation.

So you have murder statistics of before before and after of Japan banned guns?
I bet Jesus would be very happy with the numbers "after" compared to us.
 
Yes. MORE GUNS, MORE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: THE EFFECTS OF RIGHT-TO-CARRY ON CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR AND POLICING IN US CITIES

Abstract - We analyze a sample of 47 major US cities to illuminate the mechanisms that lead Right-to-Carry concealed handgun laws to increase crime. The altered behavior of permit holders, career criminals, and the police combine to generate 29 and 32 percent increases in firearm violent crime and firearm robbery respectively. The increasing firearm violence is facilitated by a massive 35 percent increase in gun theft (p=0.06), with further crime stimulus flowing from diminished police effectiveness, as reflected in a 13 percent decline in violent crime clearance rates (p=0.03). Any crime-inhibiting benefits from increased gun carrying are swamped by the crime-stimulating impacts.

Deterrence is Outweighed by Criminogenic Effects of RTC Laws - The statistically significant estimates that RTC laws increase overall firearm violent crime as well as the component crimes of firearm robbery and firearm aggravated assault by remarkably large amounts with an attendant finding of no sign of any benefit from RTC laws represent a remarkable indictment of permissive gun carrying laws.

The math - View attachment 67442152
Ho hum
More bullshit
 
You do know that many pro-2A people dont want to see it as a national law, right? Do you know why?

Yes, because they are cowards at heart and ignorant.
 
This should get a few more people killed.
 
I've always been able to carry my copy of the constitution around. what's the big deal?
 
I bet Jesus would be very happy with the numbers "after" compared to us.
Since you are mumbling some nonsense about Jesus and have not posted any links, then that is a no you do not have murder statistics of before and after of Japan banned guns?
 
Since you are mumbling some nonsense about Jesus and have not posted any links, then that is a no you do not have murder statistics of before and after of Japan banned guns?
i'm sure Jesus likes Japan's gun violence numbers compared to ours.

don't you?
 
i'm sure Jesus likes Japan's gun violence numbers compared to ours.

don't you?
Still mumbling nonsense about Jesus and have not provided any statistics on before and after Japan banned guns.
 
Still mumbling nonsense about Jesus and have not provided any statistics on before and after Japan banned guns.
hang on.

do you actually know what Jesus was all about??
 
hang on.

do you actually know what Jesus was all about??
Jesus has nothing to do with this topic. It seems you are trying to use your Jesus nonsense(I say your Jesus nonsense because you don't actually give a shit about Jesus) to get around the fact that you can not prove Japan's gun bans had any effect on the number of murders it has each year.
 
You do know that many pro-2A people dont want to see it as a national law, right? Do you know why?
No I don't actually know why. Please explain it to me.
I mean..I am legal to carry in my home state.
I am legal to carry a handgun I'm the state I am flying to for a pistol competition.

I put my handgun in checked baggage.
The connecting flight in NJ is stopped and so tgey give me my checked backage and am told I fly out of Nj the next day.

I then get arrested gor having an illegal handgun in Nj

Explain why that should be okay.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/traveling-mans-gun-arrest-appealed-to-supreme-court
 
Yes. MORE GUNS, MORE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: THE EFFECTS OF RIGHT-TO-CARRY ON CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR AND POLICING IN US CITIES

Abstract - We analyze a sample of 47 major US cities to illuminate the mechanisms that lead Right-to-Carry concealed handgun laws to increase crime. The altered behavior of permit holders, career criminals, and the police combine to generate 29 and 32 percent increases in firearm violent crime and firearm robbery respectively. The increasing firearm violence is facilitated by a massive 35 percent increase in gun theft (p=0.06), with further crime stimulus flowing from diminished police effectiveness, as reflected in a 13 percent decline in violent crime clearance rates (p=0.03). Any crime-inhibiting benefits from increased gun carrying are swamped by the crime-stimulating impacts.

Deterrence is Outweighed by Criminogenic Effects of RTC Laws - The statistically significant estimates that RTC laws increase overall firearm violent crime as well as the component crimes of firearm robbery and firearm aggravated assault by remarkably large amounts with an attendant finding of no sign of any benefit from RTC laws represent a remarkable indictment of permissive gun carrying laws.

The math - View attachment 67442152
Can you post a link to the article?
 
If we forbid anyone to carry a gun, will it decrease the number of criminals that kill with a gun.

No it won't. It will create the Mexican gun trade and leave law abiding citizens unable to defend themselves. Considering the open border policy in the Biden administration will make it easier.
 
Constitutional carry does not mean that even prohibited persons can carry. They cannot.

That's always the oddest idea I see posted from people...that it means more people will be carrying. Maybe but there's no reason they shouldnt since they are already allowed to own the guns right? In some states like WA, there are no qualifications to get your cc permit except passing a background check. Which just shows you're not a prohibited person...who shouldnt be in possession of a firearm to begin with.

So it's almost meaningless to make people jump thru that hoop IMO, except it does bring in revenue $$ since permits are $55 (I think). And it does show up on the cop's computer if you get pulled over and they run your plates. I think that's a good thing...altho IMO any cop should just assume everyone they engage with is armed but that's just me.
 
No I don't actually know why. Please explain it to me.
I mean..I am legal to carry in my home state.
I am legal to carry a handgun I'm the state I am flying to for a pistol competition.

I put my handgun in checked baggage.
The connecting flight in NJ is stopped and so tgey give me my checked backage and am told I fly out of Nj the next day.

I then get arrested gor having an illegal handgun in Nj

Explain why that should be okay.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/traveling-mans-gun-arrest-appealed-to-supreme-court

It shouldnt be ok but if all states do it, then it amounts to the same thing without the federal govt having any control over it.
 
"Well-regulated" merely denotes that the militia in question fights in a coordinated manner as a single coherent unit instead of fighting chaotically as a bunch of random individuals.

It is much like the gears in a well-regulated watch all work in harmony with each other.
*rewinds JAN 6 footage*

Ok, I think I get it………:unsure:
 
Japanese culture is so radically different that it cannot be compared to the US in any way.
Yeah, they get along with each other……
 
Back
Top Bottom