The cycle will end with "Iran now has nuclear weapons, international community welcomes them as a nuclear weapons bearing nation." Either this or "The Zionist regime of Israel has launched an attack against peaceful Iranian nuclear facilities. The UN condemns the harsh actions of the Zionist entity."
i'm sure the US, who still remains the only country in the world that has committed the crime of inflicting nuclear devastation on a nation not just once, but twice, might have something to say about that way before it got to that stage. don't you think?
personally i don't like the fact that anyone
has wmd. Obama talks so much of his push to rid the world of nuclear weapons. if Obama's push to rid the world of nuclear weapons, included his own then that would be a different story wouldn't it.
how can any rational person not see how wrong that is? how can anyone try to justify a U.S. policy that kills where WMD don't exist after using that as an excuse to bomb the hell out of Iraq, and yet turns a blind eye and unconditionally supports other Countries and provides them with billions of dollars in foreign aid each year, where they obviously do? it's insane. the leaders have absolutely no integrity at all. it's so messed up.
no one in their right mind would applaud Irans quest for nuclear weapon access, which is what you are suggesting here Digsbe. the UN will never welcome them as a nuclear weapons bearing nation. such a ridiculous comment.
how about using some commons sense. if they can't be completely rid of them then goal should be to at the very least minimize nuclear arsenals (ourselves included) and raise treaties so it's an across the board agenda for all to follow and participate in.
think Iran would be wanting nukes if no one else had them?
i sure as hell don't.