I'm scanning it now, so all commentaries are to have that kept in mind. However, I do have some concerns. While it is nowhere near as reprehensible as anything else would imply, it does raise some issues. In particular, it seeks greater recognition to act on online threats and harassment for women. Perhaps that is all well and fine, given how technology has been able to spread terror so much more easily, however, there is a dearth of protections for anyone at all. Normally legal protections in our country (you can speak for yours and your province) seek to provide protections for the broadest base of people first and then when a group within the generalized whole is incredibly targeted despite or because of neglect of existing protections, then additional protections are sought to address treatment gaps. Given the incredible amount of controversy and harm that has spread across sex, age, nationality, creed, and so on, it would perhaps be best to argue for new pieces of legislation which seek to protect the whole of the populace from online threats and harassment. Now, the purview of the report is largely sex and gender-specific and thus it would be not of much surprise to find a report which is similarly narrow in scope, however, the U.N. can also have a bit more coordination in its efforts all the same.