#
#
Timestamp:
5:37am
Add Russia to the list of those publicly disapproving of military action in Libya now that hostilities have begun. China has "expressed regret," the African Union has called for an "immediate halt," and now Moscow has "reacted 'with regret'" to the air strikes, according to a report by CNN.
The Russian statement said that the UN Security Council resolution on Libya - which came more than a month after the regime began killing civilian protesters - was "hastily adopted".
No one said anything about American troops being killed in combat, except you.
Do you have any proof that civilians are now dead?
Just the reports in the news media around the world. The same proof that I have that Obama green lighted this act of war on Libya. Do you have any proof that cruise missiles where launched into Libya yesterday?
No, it's an attack. Not war. With that logic, Israel was at war with the US when it attacked the USS Liberty during the Six Day War. You are either being disingenuous or purposefully obtuse to play a moronic semantic game that proves absolutely nothing. Good work! :roll:
LMAO. Anyone who think America was at war with Iran during the Iran-Iraq War cannot be taken seriously. Anything they say is purely devoid of reality.
The topic is U.S. Tomahawk Cruise Missiles Hit Targets in Libya. Those missiles have caused the deaths of civilians. Are those civilians collateral damage?
Just the reports in the news media around the world. The same proof that I have that Obama green lighted this act of war on Libya. Do you have any proof that cruise missiles where launched into Libya yesterday?
I didn't say anything about US troops being killed.
Ohhhhh no, it doesn'tt work like that.
"We", the west, armed the mother****er, so we have the moral obligation to take care of our own trash. It's an act of war, so be it.
It doesn't? What's the correct moral calculation, then?
AFP reports that the United Arab Emirates will be contributing 24 fighter jets (Mirage 2000-9s and F-16s) and Qatar will contribute between four and six Mirage 2000-5s, citing a French official.
It's murder. I know, because it's all I've heard for the past 9 years.
Ahh, so Bush is a murderer, all those peopl I thought were idiots are actually right.
Wanna cite any?
That's all I've heard for years, now. Does the same standard apply?
Wanna cite any?
A Libyan official told AFP at least 48 people had died and 150 were hurt -- mainly women and children -- in the assaults, which began with a strike at 1645 GMT Saturday by a French warplane on a vehicle the French military said belonged to pro-Kadhafi forces
.State-media said strikes by U.S. and coalition forces hit a civilian hospital on the outskirts of Tripoli and a gas storage facility in Misrata
It's murder. I know, because it's all I've heard for the past 9 years.
Who built the Mirage?
Bah! Everyone, who is being honest and not trying to pick a political bone, knows that we only killed Iraqi civilians in the hundreds, and that was not policy, of course. They were killed as collateral damage in bombing, by overzealous troops at checkpoints and in convoys, or by the occasional psychotic. Most Iraqi civilian deaths were caused by IEDs and carbombs, set off by insurgents. It is our responsibility, however, since we chose to invade Iraq and destabilize it, and disband the Army. That's perfectly acceptable to me.
So the question is, what the the correct moral calculation? Then and now?
Single standard and yes
That's all I've heard for years, now. Does the same standard apply?
Don't ask stupid questions. Make your point, or ask a better question.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?