- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
bush* and the republicans who created Medicare D were socialists?
Nixon, who proposed a universal health care system and a minimum income was a socialist? :lol:
They weren't full blown conservatives.
As far as Nixon goes, he was bending the Democrat majority that had ruled Congress for 30 years.
FDR was a socialist. He's the one that really got the socialism ball rolling in America.
Ah, the "not true conservative" fallacy.
And that somehow makes it ok for the Libbos to over-reach when they took control of the government?
And that makes it OK for you to use logical fallacies?
A hint: Nixon is dead and Bush is no longer president.
Yes, let's ignore history and facts :roll:
What the Euro-trash fail to realize is that the United States was never intended to be a Socialist Utopia like Europe wants to be. We as Americans do not turn to the Government to fix all of our problems; or at least we're not supposed to. Ours was intended to be a LIMITED Government, not an all-encompassing one, like they have chosen to submit to in Europe. Therefore, we are much less interested in paying into a government that we don't feel we're getting anything out of, and don't want anything from.
Cmon now...we all know we have to give all the turtledudes a tax cut so they create lots of jobs...along with all lawyers and doctors and anyone else thats rich...tax cuts are for one purpose JOB CREATION for the peasants....<guffaw>
Espeically, if they're totally irrelevant to the debate.
It makes sense to me, if a business or corporation has more money... they will invest more... Any business owners and such can set their own wages, if you tax them below a certain amount they want for their income... they will simply raise their own income and take out the money from somewhere else, maybe someone else's paycheck.
It makes sense to me, if a business or corporation has more money... they will invest more... Any business owners and such can set their own wages, if you tax them below a certain amount they want for their income... they will simply raise their own income and take out the money from somewhere else, maybe someone else's paycheck.
You cant be serious...you cant differentiate between personal tax cuts and corporate....personal tax cuts go to lawyers and doctors and CEOs and accountants and any one else thats in a top tier bracket and they create NOTHING that goes right in their pocket....its a BS story...if you want to create jobs cutting taxs...then you cut tax for Companies only if they actually create jobs...then they get a tax cut...bush tax cuts personal tax cuts to the richest americans and corporations and it didnt create a job....it lined pockets
Then of course you get in the business of telling people what to do with money and how to manage their business. Talking of a BS story.
So we shouldn't have expectations for jobs from the tax breaks we give??? That is your argument for throwing seniors under the bus to protect tax breaks for the rich?
We've had a decade of the Bush tax cuts, where are the jobs?
You falsely assume that every rich person that gets more of a tax break greater than the median income of 90% of the country, is not going to do what they have been doing for the last decade, investing that money in other countries rather than the country that gave them the tax break to begin with.
I'm not protecting the rich and since when did I even mention seniors and a bus?
I expect people to have the freedom to do with their money the way they see fit and the government to understand the working of business when they make expectations. This involves a bit of understanding of money and of economics, which I highly doubt many of them have.
You cant be serious...you cant differentiate between personal tax cuts and corporate....personal tax cuts go to lawyers and doctors and CEOs and accountants and any one else thats in a top tier bracket and they create NOTHING that goes right in their pocket....its a BS story...if you want to create jobs cutting taxs...then you cut tax for Companies only if they actually create jobs...then they get a tax cut...bush tax cuts personal tax cuts to the richest americans and corporations and it didnt create a job....it lined pockets
Under the Bush tax cuts in 2005 the rich paid more taxes then they have for 20 years.
After the the tax cuts the annual growth rate went from under .5 to 2.5% in 2002.
The cuts were instilled because of a minor recession and it stopped it in 2002.
So you are opposed to the GOP plan to cut Medicare and SS benefits and continuing the tax breaks for the rich?
Why should we go into debt giving tax breaks to the rich that are not producing jobs? Is freedom you speak of only for the rich?
I would slowly kill of the programs limiting the damage to the current people on the programs.
Espeically, if they're totally irrelevant to the debate.
Then of course you get in the business of telling people what to do with money and how to manage their business. Talking of a BS story.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?