Your superficial view of these things are comical, you could say childlike.
"... The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a state court could override the rules adopted by the legislature simply by claiming that a state constitutional provision gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election. See Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2."
“No one doubts that conducting a national election amid a pandemic poses serious challenges, ... But none of that means individual judges may improvise with their own election rules in place of those the people’s representatives have adopted.”
“the Constitution principally entrusts politically accountable state legislatures, not unelected federal judges, with the responsibility to address the health and safety of the people during the Covid-19 pandemic.”
Do you know what all that means? No? Try harder. The identity of the States are not relevant. 4 SC Justices said those things.
Those views by at least 4 SC judges and their common Constitutionally based reasons should inform you you've been pissing into the wind.
You can stop now, your shoes must be drenched.