Boo Radley
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 37,066
- Reaction score
- 7,028
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Help whom? Aw, yes, those poor workers with absolutely nothing invested in their job other than their own time. Stop ignoring what you do when you get to keep more of what you earn.
There was. But you know the study, look it up. You've been given a lot, with next to nothing in rebuttal. At least try.
The best I can do is to ignore you who are a waste of time with no solutions and being totally naïve about leadership and the qualities and responsibilities of a leader.
That attitude is exactly what I talking about. You clearly know little about how this works.
Yes, unlike you who understands the business world and expects someone else to solve all your problems for you and if they don't you blame others rather than your own leaders
I solve my problems. We're talking about country and nit me personally. I'm doing fine thank you.
Oh, I forgot, you are so much smarter than everyone else thus are the only one that can solve their own problems without govt. bureaucratic help.
You said two years, I did not. You continue to make this about morality, ignoring that there 3 unemployed for every job. You don't want them to get UI, you don't want govt assistance for retraining, you think that deregulation will cure this.......sometime.
Many of the people not working today are not working because of the of the Bush tax cuts, especially those in the public sector. The tax rates established by President Clinton were working just fine.
one bad practice doesn't a bad employer make. i don't agree with not considering the long term unemployed. however, it's still possible that the employer treats its existing employees well. if one practice like that automatically makes an employer "bad," then there are probably no "good" employers.
Another strawman on your part. I didn't say that either. Do remember, you're the one wanting the president to save you.
You don't understand good leadership at all, that is obvious. Enough of your silly games, the only solution you offered was making unions stronger. This seems to be a game for you and I am not in the mood to play it. How do strong unions make things better and who pays their costs?
So what is your solution?
And none of this ephemeral BS. Concrete proposals only as in A leads to B.
You don't understand good leadership at all, that is obvious. Enough of your silly games, the only solution you offered was making unions stronger. This seems to be a game for you and I am not in the mood to play it. How do strong unions make things better and who pays their costs?
For someone who is always stalking me get some help with comprehension of what I post. I have given my solutions many time and it serves no purpose repeating that to you, someone who couldn't care less what the proposed solutions are as you simply want attention.
If you cheerleaders wouldn't be spending so much time high fiving each other for idiotic posts you would know the answer to that question. The answer is very simple, you lead, you promote the private sector, you provide incentive to the American taxpayers by allowing them to keep more of what they earn, You unleash the American spirit and cheerlead when necessary promoting that "shining city on the hill", you wouldn't demonize any economic class for producing, you wouldn't micro manage personal responsibility issues like health care, and you don't take expensive vacations and play a lot of golf when so many people are suffering.
He offers nothing but platitudes.And your solution is what? Also how would implement it in the real world?
You realize our discussion wasn't about solutions. You were whining about taxes and regulations and started trying to redirect when you couldn't address the facts. I understand. But the truth will set you free.
:2dance::monkey:2dance::monkey
It would hae been much easier for you just to say "I know nothing and have no answers". But I guess the point was made with this post of yours as well. :lol:
He offers nothing but platitudes.
Again, back in the 80's there were plenty of manufacturing jobs in the US, today they are mostly all gone. Reagan spent money on weapons systems that generated jobs.You can start with post 883. I would give you specifics but you haven't shown the ability to understand anything other than programs offered by the govt. Reagan provided a blueprint but liberals wanting more power and people dependent on them so as to keep their jobs.
The question was asked by one of those liberals here who high five everything that another liberal posts. I gave you the answers and then asked for your solutions. As usual you offered none which just goes to show how little you know about the private sector economy or even your own behavior when it comes to your own money
Again, back in the 80's there were plenty of manufacturing jobs in the US, today they are mostly all gone. Reagan spent money on weapons systems that generated jobs.
You can start with post 883. I would give you specifics but you haven't shown the ability to understand anything other than programs offered by the govt. Reagan provided a blueprint but liberals wanting more power and people dependent on them so as to keep their jobs.
If you cheerleaders wouldn't be spending so much time high fiving each other for idiotic posts you would know the answer to that question. The answer is very simple, you lead, you promote the private sector, you provide incentive to the American taxpayers by allowing them to keep more of what they earn, You unleash the American spirit and cheerlead when necessary promoting that "shining city on the hill", you wouldn't demonize any economic class for producing, you wouldn't micro manage personal responsibility issues like health care, and you don't take expensive vacations and play a lot of golf when so many people are suffering.
We started by my correcting your tax claim. Then your regulation claim. Sorry.
You mean this:
Wallmart can not even afford to pay their healthcare costs. It is a failure of the private sector.
You are all over the place showing how little you know about the private sector financial statements, profit demand, and debt service. Now you continue to show how little you know and understand about leadership and the role of a leader. Not sure why we ever elect a President in your view of the U.S. govt.
Wal-Mart offers employees healthcare and like everything else in life expect people to pay some of those costs. People who get things free have no incentive to reduce costs since they have no skin in the game as Obama would say.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?