Well it is what it is. I respect your opinion given the fact you're actually from Israel and you have forgotten more than most of us know about the history of the region. That being said I do think your government needs to take a softer approach.
I am with anything that could bring some peace and joy to Palestinian hearts again
Sent from my PKT-301 using Tapatalk
I am not going to take you seriously using a source "Catholic Answers", while at the same time trying to convince me you're nonpartisan.
Just stop...
There are some Arabic countries trying to help Palestine but again I repeat the leaders there are corrupt not what they use to be like before 21st centuryI read comments like yours and I wonder where your head is. seriously. It's not Israel's fault that those in the Palestine territory have chosen leaders of terrorist groups to govern them
All the rich Arab countries surrounding them, why aren't they putting out the money to build the area up? Why aren't they doing more to keep the radicals out? Could it be they are anti-Semitic too and want Israel to be made the problem?
Without help from the bordering Arab countries it allows the UN to use the Palestinians as their poster child. We pour millions into Palestine and Israel. Israel flourishes. Palestine takes the money and looks like every inner city we have in the U.S. Why is that?
Then you only recognize bs.I recognize Palestine as the owner of that land.
I recognize Israel as an invader to that land.
Now you are just showing you do not know what you are talking about.Lands are owned by people who lived there for decades and served that land and made it liveable,
You need to take off your partisan blinders as they were a response to Muslim aggression and conquest.No, the Crusades were the result of a tyrant Pope with a God Complex. Remove your partisan blinders, please.The Crusades were a response to Islamic terrorism....
I pointed out with sourced material that the crusades were by and large a militarized invasion of Israel.
The Crusades were a series of religious wars sanctioned by the Latin Church in the medieval period, especially the campaigns in the Eastern Mediterranean with the aim of capturing Jerusalem and the Holy Land from Islamic rule, to recapture Christian territory and defend Christian pilgrims, in western historiography known as "the Crusades for (the recovery of) the Holy Land".[1] The term "crusades" is also applied to other campaigns sanctioned by the Church, fought to combat paganism and heresy or to resolve conflict among rival Roman Catholic groups, or to gain political or territorial advantage. The term crusades itself is early modern, modelled on Middle Latin cruciatae, and has in more recent times been extended to include religiously motivated Christian military campaigns in the Late Middle Ages.
Then can you enrich us with your perspective " which has validity"Then you only recognize bs.
Now you are just showing you do not know what you are talking about.
Your perspective has no validity.
so he fought to save Israel from the people who used to live there?
What amazes me is how are the majority reacting emotionally (if not being somehow racist) when it comes to Israel and just start throwing arguments about historical claim and whatsoever.Actually the Israelis use to live there, and now too.
No but look at the Palestinian population and the Israeli population, does it have to be an Israeli rise and a Palestinian fall ?
Why not respect the borders that UN chose years ago ?
Die hard Israel supporters use the "But the jews once lived there a long long long long long long time ago" argument.Funny how those same people would tell the native Americans to piss off if native Americans said they wanted their land back or tell blacks to piss off if blacks said they want reparations for slavery.You say it's their land ? How is that possible ? Before 1947 who were living there ?
Who gave UK the right to donate Palestinian land to jews ?
Sent from my PKT-301 using Tapatalk
i'm sure all you good folks who defend Israel would gladly give your land away to people who decided it was theirs now.
iLOLWhat amazes me is how are the majority reacting emotionally (if not being somehow racist) when it comes to Israel and just start throwing arguments about historical claim and whatsoever.
1. You seem to be forgetting the Israelis who have been born there.People understand this, everyone who lives in Israel today is from another country with already a home and a previous land but the people living in Palestine they don't have alternate home because they are already in their home.
People born there have the right yes, but where were their parents living ? If in Palestine the they are Palestinian Jews because the expression "State of Israel" didn't exist before it is just a name for the Jewish Zionist invadersiLOL
No.
The emotional reactions and arguments have been from Palestinian supporters.
1. You seem to be forgetting the Israelis who have been born there.
2. Those people who have immigrated to Israel are in their homes of their Country known as Israel.
1. There you go making a nonfactual emotional argument.People born there have the right yes, but where were their parents living ? If in Palestine the they are Palestinian Jews because the expression "State of Israel" didn't exist before it is just a name for the Jewish Zionist invaders
Die hard Israel supporters use the "But the jews once lived there a long long long long long long time ago" argument.Funny how those same people would tell the native Americans to piss off if native Americans said they wanted their land back or tell blacks to piss off if blacks said they want reparations for slavery.
Established ?! It's a word to give a more appropriate name to the invasion.1. There you go making a nonfactual emotional argument.
The State of Israel was legally established. It wasn't an invasion.
2. Many of their parents were born there also, not that it matters one bit because they do not have to be born there to be a citizen.
Yeah they can't because they cannot declare war on USA without weapons and army, right ?The native Americans would have to take the land to make it the same situation.
There you go again with the emotional argument. There was no invasion.Established ?! It's a word to give a more appropriate name to the invasion.
This is just nonsense as a reply to what was said and is indicative of a lack of knowledge concerning the establishment of Israel.And if their parents lived there before what made them call for "establishing" a country for Jews, well obviously there war no crimes towards them in Palestine.
I doubt anyone is interested in seeing what type of phone you have being repeated over and over again.Sent from my PKT-301 using Tapatalk
Firstly, let me tell you my friend I'm new to Tapatlk and I didn't pay attention to that issue because I'm more focused on the subject but thanks I will disable it.There you go again with the emotional argument. There was no invasion.
Israel was legally established.
This is just nonsense as a reply to what was said and is indicative of a lack of knowledge concerning the establishment of Israel.
I doubt anyone is interested in seeing what type of phone you have being repeated over and over again.
You can always go into tapatalk's settings and turn that notification off.
they fighting a guerrilla war. just like george washington did.
war spoils have not changed at any point in history, you are just trying to justify a double standard.
Firstly, let me tell you my friend I'm new to Tapatlk and I didn't pay attention to that issue because I'm more focused on the subject but thanks I will disable it.
[...]
Sent from my PKT-301 using Tapatalk
Oy vey! There is no way you do not know.Secondly, can you please tell me how is Israel legally established ? I mean what are the things we need to look for to say a state is established ?
Finally someone with more knowledge than I do is here, help man ! LolNot true. International law post WW2 made it illegal to acquire land through military conquest or invasion. Israel has no legal right to the occupied territories, nor to build settlements on occupied land.
You got me confused my friend Lol !!Wow. Your use of English magically improved and were even friends now. :rollseyes: iLOL
Oy vey! There is no way you do not know.
Asking this. Improved English.
I suspect a paid shill.
We are done here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?