• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Two Masked Men Try To Rob 67-Year-Old Man, Pay The Price

The OP...not that it surprises me.

Oh you thought that I was referring to you didn't you ?
no that wouldnt have made sense but i actually had no clue because you didn't say and you mentioned "post", which is a posters name but didnt post here so i was all confused??? lol
 
no that wouldnt have made sense but i actually had no clue because you didn't say and you mentioned "post", which is a posters name but didnt post here so i was all confused??? lol

Sorry to have confused you.

Though my use of the pronoun "he", rather than "you" might have made this clear, to someone able to read English properly.
 
Sorry to have confused you.

Though my use of the pronoun "he", rather than "you" might have made this clear, to someone able to read English properly.
like i said, i didnt think you mean me, that was your factually wrong assumption and your failedand unclear post is what the confusion was . . LMAO
nice try though!
 
like i said, i didnt think you mean me, that was your factually wrong assumption and your failedand unclear post is what the confusion was . . LMAO
nice try though!

Unclear to you perhaps.

And yes, you did.
 
Unclear to you perhaps.

And yes, you did.
no, factually unclear

and no i didnt, like i said I thought you were talking to post . . so no matter how many times you lie and claim otherwise facts wont change they will just further my entertainment , but keep trying its haliritous and typical of your posts! LMAO
quick, post another lie and deny facts again!
😂 🍿
 
no, factually unclear

To your mind perhaps, not to anyone else/

and no i didnt, like i said I thought you were talking to post . . so no matter how many times you lie and claim otherwise facts wont change they will just further my entertainment , but keep trying its haliritous and typical of your posts! LMAO
quick, post another lie and deny facts again...

Yes you did.
 
To your mind perhaps, not to anyone else


Yes you did.
YES you posted more failed and retarded lies just like i asked!!! LMAO
Facts dont care about your feelings!
quick do it again!
😂 🍿
 
In YOUR opinion.
nope its a fact it didnt make sense and i thought you were talking to post . . .
lets look at your post . . . .

Post


He didn't read the caveat:

Note: we are republishing this story amid the surge in crime America is currently facing during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
ooooooops LMAO
your moroinic and failed lie gets the shit kicked out of it again
Keep digging, this is awesome!
😂 🍿
 
Gun fetishists admit that many mass shootings are done with legally-owned firearms, particularly at school. Therefore you want dead children.

It's weird how triggered you get when someone defines your motivation for you, and yet you do the same to others every single day on this forum.
gun fetishist: a term those who hate LAW ABIDING GUN OWNERS and Ownership because the haters are leftwing activists who despise the fact that avid gun owners and gun groups generally vote against the left wing scum the haters support. I have seen enough of your posts to know that you invariably lie about gun owners and gun ownership. and when you constantly attack legal gun owners, it takes no imagination to decide what motivates your anti gun posts
 
Yet your attitude towards their deaths from a mass shooting is that they're "insignificant".
they are in terms of national politics
 
Your desired environment is more dead children.

I get to define your motives, so don't even bother objecting.
where you fail is I accurately said that banning guns will only disarm those who follow gun bans.
 
nope its a fact it didnt make sense and i thought you were talking to post . . .
lets look at your post . . . .


ooooooops LMAO
your moroinic and failed lie gets the shit kicked out of it again
Keep digging, this is awesome

Whatever

When you're in a hole...
 
No they're not, and thinking like that is why you've lost the argument.
Rich, I think I can speak for most of the posters on the gun forum. You have never won an argument, except when you contradict some of your other posts
 
Whatever

When you're in a hole...
Thats what I thoguht, facts dont care about your lies and feelings LMAO
lets look again . . .

Post

He didn't read the caveat:

Note: we are republishing this story amid the surge in crime America is currently facing during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
😂 🍿
 
gun fetishist: a term those who hate LAW ABIDING GUN OWNERS and Ownership because the haters are leftwing activists who despise the fact that avid gun owners and gun groups generally vote against the left wing scum the haters support. I have seen enough of your posts to know that you invariably lie about gun owners and gun ownership. and when you constantly attack legal gun owners, it takes no imagination to decide what motivates your anti gun posts
I do this every time you do it about us. Weird that you haven't figured this out yet.
 
where you fail is I accurately said that banning guns will only disarm those who follow gun bans.
I accurately said that the policies you desire result in more dead children.

The fail is yours.
 
I do this every time you do it about us. Weird that you haven't figured this out yet.
I like watching you do it because your stupid comments have no basis in fact. I have already had one of the major gun banners on this board admit that a gun ban would disarm honest people much faster and much sooner and far more extensively than it would disarm the criminals who already disobey gun bans and violate malum per se laws. There is no evidence whatsoever anything coming close to a "gun fetish"
 
I accurately said that the policies you desire result in more dead children.

The fail is yours.
you cannot prove that. You would have to prove that if the gun control laws you want were in place, there would be less dead children. places like Baltimore and Chicago cut against that. So your argument is subject to massive dispute. no one has denied that a gun ban would disarm the law abiding faster than criminals
 
you cannot prove that. You would have to prove that if the gun control laws you want were in place, there would be less dead children. places like Baltimore and Chicago cut against that. So your argument is subject to massive dispute. no one has denied that a gun ban would disarm the law abiding faster than criminals

You haven't proven shit. Deal with it.
 
You haven't proven shit. Deal with it.
your anti gun posts are a silly combination of hate for lawful gun owners and compete ignorance of the subject. If you want to go ahead and pretend people --who already violate federal gun bans and commit violent crimes with guns--are going to be disarmed faster due to a complete gun ban, than those who follow the laws (even stupid ones) go ahead
 
Back
Top Bottom