United States v. Alvarez makes clear, however, that the Supreme Court has not endorsed a general rule that “false statements receive no First Amendment protection.” Rather, the Court reinforced that only knowing or reckless false statements are unprotected.
Nobody cares about Hunter's dick picks. This is a bullshit retaliation tactic used by the right to help dump get revenge.
More nonsenical right-wing bullshit.
They govenment has the right to ASK for assistance. There was no censorship. That is reich-wing bullshit.
Just stop? I know you have no knowledge about anything that actually matters but the government is constrained from asking other entities from committing acts it is constitutionally prohibited from doing.
LOL, you think unreasonably narrowing my argument to false facts makes any sense? I didnt say anything about false statements, I said the government is prohibited from coercing others into doing things the government constitutionally cannot.
Uh, apparently you don't know the specifics of what the Biden admin pushed twitter to flag, it was primarily covid mis-info
See above.
Ahhh, doesn't know the subject, sad.
Uh, apparently you didn't read the twitter files. They did plenty of coercion that was not about Covid.
sigh....
Twitters own legal filings exposed and contradicted Musk's claims
not only is misinfo not protected speech, Twitter/Musk were not censored by the US govt, Musk made a choice as to what to post, anyone can request content moderation.
We call it science. You indulge in CT
Wikipedia? LMAO get real.sigh....
"The correspondence between the FBI and Twitter show nothing more than examples of our traditional, longstanding and ongoing federal government and private sector engagements, which involve numerous companies over multiple sectors and industries. As evidenced in the correspondence, the FBI provides critical information to the private sector in an effort to allow them to protect themselves and their customers. The men and women of the FBI work every day to protect the American public. It is unfortunate that conspiracy theorists and others are feeding the American public misinformation with the sole purpose of attempting to discredit the agency."
Twitter Files - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Twitters own legal filings exposed and contradicted Musk's claims
not only is misinfo not protected speech, Twitter/Musk were not censored by the US govt, Musk made a choice as to what to post, anyone can request content moderation.
Its weird to see rwers complain about rightwing moderation done by Musk at Twitter to discredit Biden....and compare it.... to Bezos protecting Musk at WAPO.
They are both working towards the Fur....er......Donald.
oooh, shoot the messenger....wow, how pathetic.
Its wikipedia, anyone can edit that shit. Get a real source and present something backed by facts.
It's not.
Still shooting the messenger, still can't show ANY falsehood(s).
You probably already know what really went on, but if you don’t, you could look it up if you let yourself escape that liberal thought bubble you’re in.
The government CAN ask people to avoid doing things. There is no law that says they cannot and doing so IS NOT IN ANY, WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM AN ACT OF CENSORSHIP.
Hey bro, linking to MT's screed is not YOU proving anything.
This is a bullshit statement the right uses when they get called for posting lies.
Guess what bro, neither is wikipedia.
I have already addressed this.
Oh really? You were a party to the FBI coercing Facebook? Nope.
The FBI DID NOT coerce Facebook.
You seem to forget that those companies are entitled to moderate themselves. Trump was told REPEATEDLY to stop posting misinformation and did not do so. He was banned as a result of his failure to comply with the rules of the board. This is PEFRFECTLY LEGAL and is NOT CENSORSHIP.
More baseless babbling bullshit.
