- Joined
- May 14, 2009
- Messages
- 24,680
- Reaction score
- 8,662
- Location
- Israel
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
No innocents were "murdered" there.They where murdered by rockets and missiles, yes.
The recently approved sanctions against Iran will not require Turkey to take any additional measures or institute any new arrangements, the Foreign Ministry has said following its initial assessment of the UN Security Council’s resolution.
“Sanctions do not affect our energy cooperation with Iran at all. Turkey already does not have important operations with Iranian banking systems. So we do not need any measures to address that,” diplomatic sources told the Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review on Thursday.
“The sole consequences of the new sanctions for Turkey will be increasing border controls, such as for cargos of Iranian ships. But no new legal arrangements are yet needed,” the sources said.
Although Turkey, along with Brazil, voted “no” on the Security Council resolution to impose new sanctions against Iran over its controversial nuclear program, Ankara has assured the international community that it will implement them while taking other countries’ moves as a precedent for its own measures.
“Currently, we already implement the required inspections on our borders. But there will be additional technical measures taken,” diplomatic sources told the Daily News. “For instance, the previous practice was that if objectionable material was detected on a ship, it was sent back to the country of the ship’s flag. Hereafter, it will be destroyed immediately.”
It does matter, a lot, in the context of your statement. (More like an accusation)It wouldn't matter.
What are you talking about? People were killed, and there wer many injuries.No one was killed and I don't even think there were many injuries on Israel's side in the months leading to the Gaza War.
In other words, Israel has went to war with Hamas.Yet Israel decided it was ok to attack everything and anything it could possibly construe as a strategic target.
I call bull****.There are enough plausible targets that Israel would have killed hundreds of civilians by now if they were in Turkey's shoes in this incident.
Israel showed no consideration for Lebanon's sovereignty and Lebanese civilians paid the price more than anyone. If Turkey retaliated the way Israel retaliated I assure you there would be far more dead civilians right now.
The ship's crew has attacked the soldiers and they have eventually resisted, and yes it is quite off-topic.The hell it's off-topic. You don't honestly expect anyone to believe you are screaming "bloody hypocrisy" over Turkey's criticism from a year and a half ago do you? The soldiers didn't "eventually resist" they were cracking down from the start and simply escalated their actions.
Most of the times no civilians die, but that doesn't make your news. From the same reason.I'm sure Israel wants people to think it is unintentional, but it seems every time they attack civilians die.
Then let me use alexa's words in the context of this argument and say that even suggesting that Israeli soldiers are deliberately shooting innocent civilians is sick.It has been a consistent policy of Israel dating back to independence and hell even back to the British Mandate to use disproportionate force. That inevitably means more civilians die so I say Israel does deliberately target civilians.
Then let me use alexa's words in the context of this argument and say that even suggesting that Israeli soldiers are deliberately shooting innocent civilians is sick.
Good onebut let's put it in context. You said that British Soldiers deliberately killed civilians in Afghanistan and you said that the number they killed were at least as many as were killed in Gaza.
That would mean that one third of the people who died in Afghanistan by the British were children and that they were deliberately killed by UK soldiers. Suggesting that with no proof, I did indeed find sick.
I have never said that British soldiers deliberately killed civilians, read don's comment.
As to the latter statement, I was referring to civilians and not to children specifically. I believe I've even used the word "civilians" when saying this and not the word children.
So once more, suggesting that Israeli/British/American soldiers deliberately kill innocent children is sick.
Irrelavent, since I have referred to civilians in general and not to children in private.When you upped the stakes from simply killing to deliberately killing, you did use the word civilians. However this began with talking only about children.
No, I've never said this, you're putting words in my mouth.From what you said and to which I responded that it was sick, you did indeed say that British soldiers deliberately killed civilians.
I have never said such thing, I said that Britain has killed more civilians in Afghanistan than Israel did in the Gaza war. Period.Given that you had previously said killed more children than Israel in Gaza, it can be taken that you were saying that 1/3rd of the people killed in Afghanistan by the British were children.
Irrelavent, since I have referred to civilians in general and not to children in private.
No, I've never said this, you're putting words in my mouth.
I did say that Pete is unwilling to claim that Britain deliberately kills civilians and I did ask Pete if he believes that Britain is killing civilians, but none of those statements, contrary to your bizarre claims, mean that I in person have ever said that Britain deliberately kills civilians, and I obviously have never said such a thing.
Since you've already been clarified on that, and since you've had even one of the forum's moderators explaining this to you, I'd refer to any further claims about me saying something that I haven't (and that I've shown strong opposition to) as a libel, which is against the forum's rules.
I have never said such thing, I said that Britain has killed more civilians in Afghanistan than Israel did in the Gaza war. Period.
Yes you did but I do not have some people's patience to go on and on with ever longer posts. You misrepresented what I said. That is for others particularly Demon of light to know. Please do not do that again.
It does matter, a lot, in the context of your statement. (More like an accusation)
What are you talking about? People were killed, and there wer many injuries.
In other words, Israel has went to war with Hamas.
I call bull****.
The ship's crew has attacked the soldiers and they have eventually resisted, and yes it is quite off-topic.
Most of the times no civilians die, but that doesn't make your news. From the same reason.
Then let me use alexa's words in the context of this argument and say that even suggesting that Israeli soldiers are deliberately shooting innocent civilians is sick.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?