Tucker Carlson Explains the Govt Created Subsidized Baby Formula Monopoly and Current Shortages

[White MAGA Man]

You insist on "being informed" about current events and other political issues by an intensely partisan, evening TV entertainer
and you react defensively when this is pointed out to you while in truth, we're doing you and this country a favor in telling you.

Nothing good will result from your defensive disdain.

Rachel Maddow - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

"..Television​

In June 2005, Maddow became a regular panelist on the MSNBC show ..hosted by Tucker Carlson.[30] During and after the November 2006 election, she was a guest on CNN's Paula Zahn Now; she was also a correspondent for The Advocate Newsmagazine, an LGBT-oriented short-form newsmagazine for Logo deriving from news items published by The Advocate. In January 2008, Maddow became an MSNBC political analyst and was a regular panelist on MSNBC's Race for the White House with David Gregory and MSNBC's election coverage as well as a frequent contributor on Countdown with Keith Olbermann.

In 2008, Maddow was the substitute host for Countdown with Keith Olbermann, her first time hosting a program on MSNBC. Maddow described herself on-air as "nervous". Keith Olbermann complimented her work, and she was brought back to host Countdown the next month. The show she hosted was the highest-rated news program among people aged 25 to 54. For her success, Olbermann ranked Maddow third in his show's segment "World's Best Persons". In July 2008, Maddow filled in again for several broadcasts. Maddow also filled in for David Gregory as host of Race for the White House.

Olbermann began to push for Maddow to gain her own show at MSNBC, .."

Tucker Carlson - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

"..From 2005 to 2008, he hosted the nightly program Tucker on MSNBC He has been a political analyst for Fox News since 2009, ..In 2010, Carlson co-founded and served as the initial editor-in-chief of the right-wing news and opinion website The Daily Caller, .. He has written three books: ..

An advocate of former .. Trump, Carlson was described by Politico as "perhaps the highest-profile proponent of 'Trumpism'", while also noting that Carlson is willing to criticize Trump when he believes that the former president is straying from that ideology. He is also said to have influenced some of Trump's decisions as president, including the cancellation of a military strike against Iran in 2019, the firing of John Bolton, and the commutation of Roger Stone's prison sentence in 2020. Carlson has been a leading voice of white grievance politics. His remarks on race, immigration, and women – including slurs he said on air between 2006 and 2011 .. – have at times been described as racist and sexist and have provoked advertiser boycotts of Tucker Carlson Tonight. As of July 2021, it was the most-watched cable news show in the United States.

Carlson is a vocal opponent of progressivism and critic of immigration, and has been described as a nationalist. Formerly an economic libertarian, he now supports protectionism. In 2004, he renounced his initial support for the Iraq War, and has since been skeptical of U.S. foreign interventions. Carlson has promoted conspiracy theories about topics such as demographic replacement, COVID-19, and the 2021 U.S. Capitol attack.."

Your irrelevant post proves you can't debunk Tucker's facts.

 

[White MAGA Man]

Does anyone else wonder where these lunatics come from?

Yeah...here is what happened (in this case)....A bunch of Democrats got together and decided that we should have a baby formula shortage.

Its almost as crazy as what liberals (mostly) used to say about Bush's gang planning 9/11.

I see you can't debunk Tucker's facts on the baby formula shortage. It's totally Biden's fault.

 

[White MAGA Man]

More proof that facts have no impact on neo-conservatives.

I see you can't debunk Tucker's facts.

 

[White MAGA Man]

Try not to be so gullible.

• A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.
• The network asked a judge to dismiss the case, arguing that "Carlson's statements were not statements of fact and that she failed adequately to allege actual malice."
• The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer is skeptical of anything he says.

Your post has nothing to do with the baby formula shortage Tucker addresses.

 

[mike2810]

/sarcasm on
Mr. Tucker:
-Why didn't President Trump have more Baby Formula plans built in the US?
- Trump should have known that covid was going to cause problems.

 

[Loulit01]

I see you can't debunk Tucker's facts.

Tucker wouldn't know a fact if he was swimming in a sea of facts, with a dozen facts clutched in one hand, while the other held an infallible fact detector.

 

[White MAGA Man]

Wait. You're not joking? You believe TUCKER CARLSON??

Checks notes.

You're a white supremacist, you must love him. Your issue is, he's singing to a very small choir . Most people hate that Nazi prick

What's wrong with being White?
What's wrong with being supreme?
Winning is being supreme, or the best.

Also, in case you haven't heard, Nazi's haven't existed since 1945.

 

[White MAGA Man]

Tucker wouldn't know a fact if he was swimming in a sea of facts, with a dozen facts clutched in one hand, while the other held an infallible fact detector.

I see you can't debunk the substance of Tucker's facts.

 

[Loulit01]

I see you can't debunk the substance of Tucker's facts.

Debunking Tucker was already done by Fox News and a court of law. Now I just have fun with him.

 

[Luckyone]

You can't debunk Tucker's facts.

Facts are often cherry picked and then twisted to be seen in the light that the presenter wants you to see. Nonetheless, facts evaluation requires that everything involved is shown and stated in order to get the true picture. Tucker did not do that.

Carlson presented just one side (and a small side) of the entire picture. Simply stated, he gave what he wanted you to see while leaving everything else out.........and guess what? You bought it, hook, line and sinker.

What does that say about you?

 

[post]

Your irrelevant post proves you can't debunk Tucker's facts.

Opinion | Democrats With a Dirty Secret — They Watch Fox

New data shows the conservative outlet has plenty of left-leaning viewers. Turns out everyone likes to be entertained.

www.politico.com

February 2, 2022
FOURTH ESTATE

Opinion | Democrats With a Dirty Secret — They Watch Fox​

"New data shows the conservative outlet has plenty of left-leaning viewers. Turns out everyone likes to be entertained.
...
Not until he landed at Fox in 2009 and got schooled by Roger Ailes for seven years in the arts of broadcasting did he enjoy his breakout moments.

Fox’s founding ethos, formulated by Ailes and owner Rupert Murdoch, was that an unserved conservative audience existed, ignored by other news networks and most newspapers, and that they could fill it with something akin to what Rush Limbaugh was doing on AM radio. Their formula, which depended on tabloid instincts, was more successful than either imagined. Gone was the politesse that characterized the competition and in was the two-fisted contention of a street fight. Fox does its best to seek conflict and accentuate it for the camera. It’s never going to win a Peabody, but it’s what the masses like — and clearly not just conservatives.
....
The Nielsen data serves as a programming lesson to CNN and MSNBC. If those two networks want Fox-sized audiences, maybe they should stop thinking less about ideological appeal and more about showmanship. Make the news Foxy."

 

[dncc]

I see you can't debunk Tucker's facts on the baby formula shortage. It's totally Biden's fault.

Tucker has no facts. Joe Biden isn't responsible for your stocking baby formula. He really isn't.

 

[NolanVoyd]

Much like Maddow on MSNBC do you have a point?

A Court Ruled Rachel Maddow's Viewers Know She Offers Exaggeration and Opinion, Not Facts

"Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news," an Obama-appointed judge ruled.

greenwald.substack.com

MSNBC's top-rated host Rachel Maddow devoted a segment in 2019 to accusing the right-wing cable outlet One America News (OAN) of being a paid propaganda outlet for the Kremlin. Discussing a Daily Beast article which noted that one OAN reporter was a "Russian national” who was simultaneously writing copy for the Russian-owned outlet Sputnik on a freelance contract, Maddow escalated the allegation greatly into a broad claim about OAN's real identity and purpose: “in this case,” she announced, “the most obsequiously pro-Trump right wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda."

In response, OAN sued Maddow,

Yes. My point was obvious.

The Op cited Tucker as of it were true.

No one did the same with Maddow, and if somebody does, then by all means point it out on that thread.

 

[White MAGA Man]

Tucker has no facts. Joe Biden isn't responsible for your stocking baby formula. He really isn't.

Yes, Biden is completely responsible! Totally unequivocally responsible!

 

[Luckyone]

I see you can't debunk the substance of Tucker's facts.

Here are the "facts" and the involvement of Biden in them. It is NOT what Tucker claimed they were.

Baby Formula Shortage Fuels Misleading Partisan Claims​

A shortage of baby formula has provoked misleading partisan claims that suggest President Joe Biden is responsible for the “bare shelves.” But the shortage has been caused by a recall and plant shutdown by a major manufacturer and ongoing supply-chain issues due to the pandemic.

You are just spewing right wing Biased partisan BS

 

[NolanVoyd]

Totally irrelevant to his baby formula commentary.

According to Fox Nees, you shouldn't take anything Tucker says seriously. You should know that it is nonsense. yet here you are citing Tucker in your OP, as if what he says was factual, and actual news.

 

[Luckyone]

Yes, Biden is completely responsible! Totally unequivocally responsible!

I am with you man, lets get Trump back in office so we can make things work again as only Trump knows how to do.



Let's get rid of Biden's failures and replace them with Trump failures. At least with Trump, we can believe his lies as he is a master con artist. Biden cannot con an idiot. We will be better off if we just "believe" we will be better off. Who wants reality, right? Let us all live in fantasy?

We need this:

 

[dncc]

Yes, Biden is completely responsible! Totally unequivocally responsible!

Well, if memes and cartoons say so... LOL

 

[Luckyone]

According to Fox Nees, you shouldn't take anything Tucker says seriously. You should know that it is nonsense. yet here you are citing Tucker in your OP, as if what he says was factual, and actual news.

Nolan, you cannot change the mind of a paid Russian hacker. He is not going to stop as he is paid to do the job.

 

[Helix]

Tuck tuck is a far right wing political hack.

News at eleven.

 

[dncc]

The average supermarket has 95 to 99% of what you need at any given time.

So Joe gets credit for you being able to get 95-99% of what you need then...right? If he's boing to be held accountable for shortages then she should get credit for the abundance too.

 

[ChrisIsLeft]

What's wrong with being White?
What's wrong with being supreme?
Winning is being supreme, or the best.

Also, in case you haven't heard, Nazi's haven't existed since 1945.

Nazism is a political ideology. No one is saying there's anything bad about being white. It doesn't make you supreme, Nazi. You just cling to it because you've achieved little else

 

[post]

What's wrong with being White?
What's wrong with being supreme?
Winning is being supreme, or the best.

Also, in case you haven't heard, Nazi's haven't existed since 1945.

We're all descendants of the subjugated. You're too indoctrinated to do anything other than enable the most powerful,
the ones exploiting the voting majorities in the poorest, least educated states.

Inside 'A People's History'

Inside 'A People's History'

www.latimes.com

February 1, 2022

"When Columbus and his sailors came ashore, carrying swords, speaking oddly, the Arawaks ran to greet them, brought them food, water, gifts. He later wrote of this in his log:

They . . . brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks’ bells. They willingly traded everything they owned. . . . They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features. . . . They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane. . . . They would make fine servants. . . . With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

These Arawaks of the Bahama Islands were much like Indians on the mainland, who were remarkable (Europeans observers were to say again and again) for their hospitality, their belief in sharing. These traits did not stand out in the Europe of the Renaissance, dominated as it was by the religion of popes, the government of kings, the frenzy for money that marked Western Civilization and its first messenger to the Americas, Christopher Columbus."