- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 23,909
- Reaction score
- 11,003
- Location
- New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
CNN said:Boston (CNN) [Breaking news update, posted at 2:13 p.m.]
Jurors in the Boston Marathon bombing trial have found Dzhokhar Tsarnaev guilty of using a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death, and aiding and abetting, a charge that carries a possible penalty of death.
[Breaking news update, posted at 2:12 p.m.]
Jurors in the Boston Marathon bombing trial have found Dzhokhar Tsarnaev guilty of conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death, a charge that carries a possible penalty of death.
Tsarnaev guilty in Boston bombing - CNN.com
Tsarnev is found guilty and guilty of the charges that carry the death penalty. The penalty phase should be (I would assume) be seeking the death penalty, though I do not believe Mass. has executed someone since the 1940's.
Well considering that Tsarnaev did admit to bombing the Boston Marathon I would have been surprised if he wasnt guilty... I mean why even have a trial if the guy admitted to it in the first place?
Well considering that Tsarnaev did admit to bombing the Boston Marathon I would have been surprised if he wasnt guilty... I mean why even have a trial if the guy admitted to it in the first place?
There was no need to spend millions on a trial that lasted for weeks when he admitted to it. Probably been better off if he just got sentenced right after the charges were filed.Due process is the answer to your question.
There was no need to spend millions on a trial that lasted for weeks when he admitted to it. Probably been better off if he just got sentenced right after the charges were filed.
There was no need to spend millions on a trial that lasted for weeks when he admitted to it. Probably been better off if he just got sentenced right after the charges were filed.
I'm okay with a trial, that's his right under the Constitution. Now that he's been found guilty, he needs to become worm food as soon as possible.There was no need to spend millions on a trial that lasted for weeks when he admitted to it. Probably been better off if he just got sentenced right after the charges were filed.
The death penalty is too good for him, put him to work doing hard labor.
He admitted involvement; his defense claimed the brother was the brains behind it.
It never had a chance in H*** of workign but I guess he had to try something.
Blaming the older brother and extremist religious indoctrination were probably more strategies to avoid the death penalty than prevent conviction.
Definetly, doubt it will work
Tsarnaev guilty in Boston bombing - CNN.com
Tsarnev is found guilty and guilty of the charges that carry the death penalty. The penalty phase should be (I would assume) be seeking the death penalty, though I do not believe Mass. has executed someone since the 1940's.
Blaming the older brother and extremist religious indoctrination were probably more strategies to avoid the death penalty than prevent conviction.
In an ideal world, I'd like to think we wouldn't have mass killings at all.In an ideal world yes, but the constitution demands a trial.
Personally in an ideal world guys like this, Breivik and that Colorado Batman shooter guy are taken behind the shed and put down like the animals they are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?