• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trust God and call it a day? I saw that bumper sticker this morning. I think it's stupid. How about trust yourself instead?

God can see the future on odd days but not the even ones. I guess daisy wants it both ways, he can see into the future and he can't, take your pick.
Wrong, Daisy believes that God has complete/absolute control over His powers...
 
That's because it is crazy.

God did need a makeover between testaments to improve his public image.

If it was part of some "plan," it's not a great plan. If not, then go's is too impotent to do anything.
Yeah, that whole "smashing babies against rocks" crapola isn't a good look at all for a "loving creator". :eek:
 
So does Satan's "ways work". Jehovah has even empowered his arch enemy Satan with the ability to deceive the Creator's human creations as he so chooses.
So is it God or Satan who instigate or inspire the "thought crimes" some believe we should be killed for?
 
Wrong, Daisy believes that God has complete/absolute control over His powers...
I'm only going by what you have said and you've said both, he can see into the future, he can't see into the future, in case you missed that in a previous post by another member.
 
I'm only going by what you have said and you've said both, he can see into the future, he can't see into the future, in case you missed that in a previous post by another member.
Nope, I haven't missed anything...complete control over His powers also means He can be selective in using them any way He so chooses...
 
Nope, I haven't missed anything...complete control over His powers also means He can be selective in using them any way He so chooses...
Yet you've put forth numerous posts in which you claim that 'you know' when, and when not, Jehovah chooses to use or not use (be selective) his omniscience without presenting any biblical evidence whatsoever to support your positive assertion/s. From whence did you acquire the knowledge to boldly profess that you can read Jehovah's mind as to when and when not he opts to flip his omniscience on and off like a light switch?
 
Selective exercise of foreknowledge. The alternative to predestinarianism, the selective or discretionary exercise of God’s powers of foreknowledge, would have to harmonize with God’s own righteous standards and be consistent with what he reveals of himself in his Word. In contrast with the theory of predestinarianism, a number of texts point to an examination by God of a situation then current and a decision made on the basis of such examination.

Thus, at Genesis 11:5-8 God is described as directing his attention earthward, surveying the situation at Babel, and, at that time, determining the action to be taken to break up the unrighteous project there. After wickedness developed at Sodom and Gomorrah, Jehovah advised Abraham of his decision to investigate (by means of his angels) to “see whether they act altogether according to the outcry over it that has come to me, and, if not, I can get to know it.” (Ge 18:20-22; 19:1) God spoke of ‘becoming acquainted with Abraham,’ and after Abraham went to the point of attempting to sacrifice Isaac, Jehovah said, “For now I do know that you are God-fearing in that you have not withheld your son, your only one, from me.”—Ge 18:19; 22:11, 12; compare Ne 9:7, 8; Ga 4:9.

Selective foreknowledge means that God could choose not to foreknow indiscriminately all the future acts of his creatures. This would mean that, rather than all history from creation onward being a mere rerun of what had already been foreseen and foreordained, God could with all sincerity set before the first human pair the prospect of everlasting life in an earth free from wickedness. His instructions to his first human son and daughter to act as his perfect and sinless agents in filling the earth with their offspring and making it a paradise, as well as exercising control over the animal creation, could thus be expressed as the grant of a truly loving privilege and as his genuine desire toward them—not merely as the giving of a commission that, on their part, was foredoomed to failure. God’s arranging for a test by means of “the tree of the knowledge of good and bad” and his creation of “the tree of life” in the garden of Eden also would not be meaningless or cynical acts, made so by his foreknowing that the human pair would sin and never be able to eat of “the tree of life.”—Ge 1:28; 2:7-9, 15-17; 3:22-24
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200001549
 
Logician Man said:
Yet you've put forth numerous posts in which you claim that 'you know' when, and when not, Jehovah chooses to use or not use (be selective) his omniscience



Another on of your many lies
Tsk-Tsk.

👇

Logician Man said:
When the Biblical God created the universe, did He know He would perpetrate the Great Flood upon mankind? Yes or No?

👇

@Daisy/Elora said:
----->No<-----

☝️

Tell us @Daisy. In which biblical verse/scripture does the Christian God declare that He did not know that he would perpetrate the Great Flood upon mankind 'before' the Christian God ever created the universe and/or mankind, which is your positive assertion put forth as presented in your above post. Please present the bible verse/s if you can.


- Thanks in advance. -
 
Last edited:
Denying reality is not the equivalent of believing in the imaginary. Reality doesn’t require belief. Imaginary things do.

There's still some fools who believe in Russian Collusion Delusion or the Charlottesville Lie and they actually believe in reality......go figure.
 
Read tea leaves too or is this more a rorschach test result?

There is some evidence for God you haven't heard of before, but you are too lazy to check it out, instead make fun......this is not the response of sincere truth seekers.
 
There is some evidence for God you haven't heard of before, but you are too lazy to check it out, instead make fun......this is not the response of sincere truth seekers.
So you say. ;)
 
There is some evidence for God you haven't heard of before, but you are too lazy to check it out, instead make fun......this is not the response of sincere truth seekers.
How about you provide this so called "evidence?" You're the one making claims of evidence for God. So present it! The burden of proof is on you.
 
And you have given none, star patterns in the night sky proves God created the universe? Wow.

Well, it does take some critical thinking skills and knowledge of history......it's not meant for the lazy.
 
There is some evidence for God you haven't heard of before, but you are too lazy to check it out, instead make fun......this is not the response of sincere truth seekers.

This post is insane.
 
Back
Top Bottom