- Joined
- Nov 1, 2022
- Messages
- 26,333
- Reaction score
- 7,746
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
but science is wrong - almost all the time .... science is built on theories and hypothesis with very very few "facts" - you know thisThe same as what science considers evidence. What is not scientific evidence is testimony, experience, of belief/feelings.
you're right - thus you cannot use science as a trustable source to base your beliefs on because its wrong so oftenArgumentum ad populum. Belief does not equal fact. It doesn't matter if it's 1 person or a billion, it's still just a belief.
hey Stealth, this isn't a 5 hour show here or a Bible school
we give a few comments for short attention spans and move on.
sometimes i recommend a good seminary level book that they wont read or understand.
proof? it is everywhere, unless you don't wanna know. our Fake Atheists have zero desire for proof cept to be their own god.
ask them, they know or some kind of philosophical gibberish.
for more proof they could search out Biblical apologetics on the web...
here let me help you and the atheists: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Biblical+apologetics&ia=web
i don't hold my breath, but it could happen like winning the lotto happens. they don't think their souls are worth a dollar; atheists don't think they have a soul, so the chance of them searching for truth is close to Zero.
That's the beauty of science. It self corrects and continues searching for discoveries to lead it closer to truth. Theories are based on scientific evidence. Scientific theories are the strongest forms of explanation. But claims based on nothing but belief or hearsay lack any merit or validity.but science is wrong - almost all the time .... science is built on theories and hypothesis with very very few "facts" - you know this
I made no mention of my beliefs and science is not based on belief. It goes by what the evidence shows. What theories do you consider wrong? If a theory or even hypothesis is demonstrated to be wrong, it's either revised or discarded.you're right - thus you cannot use science as a trustable source to base your beliefs on because its wrong so often
I see
you are one of the "hit him hard over the head over and over over " people when it comes to this subject - that's fine, you be you
That's the beauty of science. It self corrects and continues searching for discoveries to lead it closer to truth.
Theories are based on scientific evidence. Scientific theories are the strongest forms of explanation. But claims based on nothing but belief or hearsay lack any merit or validity.
I made no mention of my beliefs and science is not based on belief.
It goes by what the evidence shows. What theories do you consider wrong? If a theory or even hypothesis is demonstrated to be wrong, it's either revised or discarded.
So much ignorant delusion in 1 post.however the issue with Science is that it never finds the Truth that matters.
even my Cartoons do a better job than all the science and PhD can muster
my Faith is good forever. my science books will rot and are antiquated with time.
you believe in evolution, a very fake belief in something that never happened. so yeah you have evolution gods and guitar music gods.
except the biggest scientific kind of lies like big bang and evolving. no those are sacred cows.
.
in other words - its wrong all the timeThat's the beauty of science. It self corrects and continues searching for discoveries to lead it closer to truth. Theories are based on scientific evidence. Scientific theories are the strongest forms of explanation. But claims based on nothing but belief or hearsay lack any merit or validity.
I made no mention of my beliefs and science is not based on belief. It goes by what the evidence shows. What theories do you consider wrong? If a theory or even hypothesis is demonstrated to be wrong, it's either revised or discarded.
meh, i try different things.
if someone is serious and repentant then pour Gallons of God's love on them.
if they are shaking their fist at God, then bring out the fiery Toaster Club and sword. fake atheists don't want some Vanilla sweet words like some poetry, they want full bore, in your face answers.
fire and brimstone some days.
Stealth in the end, i can't save anyone..........i just plead for them to consider their souls and Eternal Life.
most could care less, i care more about them than they do ............so you tell me.
what should i do? thanks.
Says who? Specify what it's wrong about.in other words - its wrong all the time
What belief are you referring to?believing in something that's continually wrong .... aint that special ?
Fortunately, science has advanced and corrected errors, as it does. That's why we no longer think Earth is the center of the universe. Thinking science shouldn't be accepted or trusted because it's "wrong" about something, but accepting a belief as true without evidence or because of feelings is what's really stupid.every theory is really guesstimates .... do you really think what science believes in 1450 was spot on and correct ? be honest - they were wrong in almost everything they believed, were they not? But the people in 1450? they 100% believed they were the pinnacle of science, they had it all figured out. In 1450, scientific thought was largely rooted in Aristotelian cosmology, which placed the Earth at the center of the universe, and the Ptolemaic model of planetary motion, with the sun, moon, and planets revolving around the Earth
doesn't that seem stupid now ?
science is wrong, all the time in almost everything and every waySays who? Specify what it's wrong about.
What belief are you referring to?
Fortunately, science has advanced and corrected errors, as it does.
science was wrong, wasn't it ?That's why we no longer think Earth is the center of the universe.
Thinking science shouldn't be accepted or trusted because it's "wrong" about something, but accepting a belief as true without evidence or because of feelings is what's really stupid.
In what way? You haven't specified what is wrong.science is wrong, all the time in almost everything and every way
science was wrong, wasn't it ?
No, I accept what's explained based on the evidenceyou trust something that's wrong all the time
That's why it fails. It's stagnant. As Science explains and understands more, the bible/God becomes an ever shrinking pocket.everything in the Bible today is exactly what it was 1000 years ago - its not changed
I literally gave an exampleIn what way? You haven't specified what is wrong.
but you fully know that science is a theory/hypothesis and its always being re-written to right the wrongsNo, I accept what's explained based on the evidence
That's why it fails. It's stagnant. As Science explains and understands more, the bible/God becomes an ever shrinking pocket.
A 500+ year old example which religion actually believed and what science already corrected, explained, and established as fact now? Yeah, great example. Got anything current?I literally gave an example
It's based on what evidence shows. Not on what one says or believes. I already said science self corrects. You want to ignore that and pretend science is wrong regardless. But that's your own bias and/or scientific illiteracy on display.but you fully know that science is a theory/hypothesis and its always being re-written to right the wrongs
Except the bible isn't fact. Much of what the bible claims has been discredited by science. It's no more consistent than any other work of literary fiction. Theists can't even agree on what the Bible says or means at times.its the same, its consistent .... like a fact would be
well amen, we have faith every day for all kinds of things.
we used to have faith in dee cee, although not much anymore; faith that there was money in the bank and electricity was on to turn on the lights and appliances.
yep, faith is kinda common.
the atheists have a lot less proof of anything; after all the Hot Air they produce here, there is not even one shred/atom of proof that there is no God.
so i don't ask that much from them, they just wear me out with idiotic comments.
Evidence for God is much better, it is EVERY where. you wake up and God gives you the sun to see; open the fridge and there is food from God.
turn on the radio and now you here from the gubment or whatever
of course, we can say this is no proof; which kinda sounds make believe to me. almost child like in reasoning.
A 500+ year old example which religion actually believed and what science already corrected, explained, and established as fact now? Yeah, great example. Got anything current?
It's based on what evidence shows. Not on what one says or believes. I already said science self corrects.
You want to ignore that and pretend science is wrong regardless. But that's your own bias and/or scientific illiteracy on display.
Except the bible isn't fact.
Much of what the bible claims has been discredited by science.
It's no more consistent than any other work of literary fiction. Theists can't even agree on what the Bible says or means at times.
CONTRADICT ONESELF Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
The meaning of
CONTRADICT ONESELF is to say or do something
that is opposite or very different in meaning to something else that one said or did earlier
I will always contend that there are no atheists.
quick googleA 500+ year old example which religion actually believed and what science already corrected, explained, and established as fact now? Yeah, great example. Got anything current?
except its wrong, all the timeIt's based on what evidence shows. Not on what one says or believes. I already said science self corrects. You want to ignore that and pretend science is wrong regardless. But that's your own bias and/or scientific illiteracy on display.
Except the bible isn't fact. Much of what the bible claims has been discredited by science. It's no more consistent than any other work of literary fiction. Theists can't even agree on what the Bible says or means at times.
Pluto is a dwarf planet.quick google
100-year-old chemistry rule proven false, updating textbooks comes next
Neil Garg is leading the charge to rewrite a fundamental principle that's been part of organic chemistry since 1924 -- Bredt's rule.www.earth.com
Pluto isn't a planet anymore - I was taught it was
His own opinion. He's not a scientist.Al Gore - “Within the decade there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro,”
Except it's self correcting of errors too. You conveniently and disingenuously ignore that aspect.google is your friend - everyday there is more " well, we got that wrong" ..... articles
except its wrong, all the time
Factual in what regard? Many of it's stories are clearly not factual or even plausible. I demonstrated as much in my Fallacy of Biblical Stories series.the Bible is very much factual - do you not know that ?
Pluto was initially classified as the ninth planet of our solar system upon its discovery in 1930Pluto is a dwarf planet.
Except it's self correcting of errors too. You conveniently and disingenuously ignore that aspect.
Factual in what regard? Many of it's stories are clearly not factual or even plausible. I demonstrated as much in my Fallacy of Biblical Stories series.
It was right. It's the parameters of planetary classification that changed.Pluto was initially classified as the ninth planet of our solar system upon its discovery in 1930
was Science right or wrong?
The Earth and other orbits the sun. Is that right or wrong? The sun "rises" easterly and sets westerly because of Earth's rotation. Is that right or wrong? The moon affects ocean tides. Is that right or wrong? The moon reflects sunlight rather than having it's own illumination. Is that right or wrong?so wrong ... until they think they're right, and then 100-200 years from now that's proven wrong too .... wrong over and over and over
you believe all that ?
still, its science changing, it was never fact at allIt was right. It's the parameters of planetary classification that changed.
The Earth and other orbits the sun. Is that right or wrong? The sun "rises" easterly and sets westerly because of Earth's rotation. Is that right or wrong? The moon affects ocean tides. Is that right or wrong? The moon reflects sunlight rather than having it's own illumination. Is that right or wrong?
The planets orbit the sun. Fact, right!still, its science changing, it was never fact at all
You have doubts? Funny how you disingenuously complain about science being wrong but ignore everything is has right. Meanwhile, the bible has been demonstrated to be wrong by science but many think the bible is right. There's a cognitive disconnect there and/or personal bias.all true as far as I know
its what we've been toldThe planets orbit the sun. Fact, right!
You have doubts? Funny how you disingenuously complain about science being wrong but ignore everything is has right. Meanwhile, the bible has been demonstrated to be wrong by science but many think the bible is right. There's a cognitive disconnect there and/or personal bias.
It's what is observed and mathematically demonstrable.its what we've been told
But you trust the bible, even though it's proven yo be erroneous or inaccurate?I don't trust any of it
Go ahead. Meanwhile actual evidence and facts tell a different story.kid - we didn't go to the moon , asbestos isn't safe, neither is fenfen ....... Pluto isn't a planet, oil didn't come from dead dinosaurs ..... and Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger, OJ did do it .....
we could go on and on
and proven wrong, over and over (sun goes around the earth)It's what is observed and mathematically demonstrable.
it has ?But you trust the bible, even though it's proven yo be erroneous or inaccurate?
your science that changes and is wrong all the time is your faith - I get itGo ahead. Meanwhile actual evidence and facts tell a different story.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?