- Joined
- Jun 20, 2018
- Messages
- 49,698
- Reaction score
- 29,538
- Location
- Somewhere in the Low Country
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
She spoke truth and that’s not slander
She spoke truth and that’s not slander§ 51-5-4
Try harder next time.
I do the sarcasm thing too, however, this is one of those things where a lighter touch works better. My suggestion is that you try to be more concise.IKR? I mean, like, why do people accused of crimes keep trying to say they're innocent? Why don't they just shut the **** up and take their punishment like everyone else does? It's like these idiots think there was ever some innocent person that got put in jail. That's never happened!!! If you accuse somebody it's because they did something and you have perfectly good reason to want them locked up! The idea that government should stand in the way of us getting what we want is, like, totally lame. They work for us and if we want some mother****er in jail then government HAS to do that!!!
So, the Bar cannot disbar her for something that has not been proven factually true in a court.
This entire Willis matter is a politically contrived controversy.Guilty of what exactly? For sure ethical lapses, but nothing they did compromised Trump's rights as a defendant. The problem was her hiring her lover as a member of the prosecution team. As I've said it's idiotic and reckless, but once he's not on the city's payroll, the 'conflict' ends as far as the defense is concerned.
That speech is going to cause her all sorts of problems. Another example of poor decision making.She spoke truth and that’s not slander
Nah it really won’t she didn’t opine on his innocence or guiltThat speech is going to cause her all sorts of problems. Another example of poor decision making.
The question is whether she made comments having a substantial likelihood of causing or increasing public condemnation of him. The answer is yes, she did.Nah it really won’t she didn’t opine on his innocence or guilt
That'll go down as one of the stupidest comments in the history of the galaxy. I have no doubt you'll be able outdo yourself.It has nothing to do with Fanni.
It has to do with the cheeto and his hate of dark-skinned people.
She spoke to receiving racist hate mail and attacks by his supportersThe question is whether she made comments having a substantial likelihood of causing or increasing public condemnation of him. The answer is yes, she did.
Provide an example where a private relationship got an attorney disbarredNot true, Attorney's are disbarred for ethics violation and for failure to act in a responsible manner as an Officer of the Court all the time.
If the Bar takes up the complaint for review instead of rejecting it. Then there will be a hearing (non-Judicial) where both sides are present, can submit "evidence", can call witnesses, and the attorney is subject to questioning.
WW
Among other things...She spoke to receiving racist hate mail and attacks by his supporters
She lied under oath.
I know you don't believe that. There really isn't any point in us arguing about it. The truth will come out.
Still betting on her getting indicted for perjury?
Yes.
Hopefully it will be after Trump is convicted.
So what is the possible criminal penalty? None.§ 51-5-4
Try harder next time.
It has nothing to do with Fanni.
It has to do with the cheeto and his hate of dark-skinned people.
The judges ruling isn't going to be overruled.
It is just another opportunity to delay the case, thanks to Fanni.
Both things can be true. The ruling on Willis wasn't glowing.It has nothing to do with Fanni.
It has to do with the cheeto and his hate of dark-skinned people.
Who cares?So what is the possible criminal penalty? None.
And qualified immunity applies to civil cases.It's a civil violation, not a crime.
She shouldn't in this case, but not because "there's no criminal penalty" or whatever rubbish you're trying post.She doesn't have immunity against defamation. Do you have a point?
Why? He is a racist.That'll go down as one of the stupidest comments in the history of the galaxy. I have no doubt you'll be able outdo yourself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?