• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump supporters, is it ok to use force against people protesting against trump's actions during his military parade?

So basically you're running away because your political girlfriend got a bunch of criminals to try to overthrow an election for him and they were convicted by juries and then he pardoned them and you can't find a comparable example.

🤣🤣🤣🤣
Nope. I have work to do. No time to argue with someone posting from his basement.
 
To think some of our fathers and many of our grandfathers fought fascism during the second world war to protect our right to free speech and to protest. Our current president wants to do harm to any protesters during his parade I'm pretty sure this isn't what our fathers and grandfathers fought for. Trump is trying to turn America into a police state, it won't work, all he is doing is pissing off more and more people.
It would be wrong for Trump to use force against protestors who exercised their First Amendment right peacefully.
 
Thanks. You said about 2,000,000 people were destroying downtown L.A.. Then when asked for proof of that, you failed to produce any. Which of course you couldn't produce any supporting evidence since you were hallucinating.
That's not all I said. Memory prob?
No. They want others to adhere to law and order. For they themselves?

View attachment 67574296
You think a five year old picture has any relevance to today's situation? :eek: Don't you have ANY current. relevant comments?
 
Huh? I denied nothing. You're denying that more currently, there more people acting much more violently. Have you issued a single word against them?

All I'm asking for is a picture of a destroyed LA, the one you said was destroyed. If you can't show me the picture you claim happened, there's no hope for you. Prove what you post is accurate.
[/QUOTE]
What part of "exaggeration" confuses you?
 
It would be wrong for Trump to use force against protestors who exercised their First Amendment right peacefully.
That's always been the key. Everyone here knows that but supposition abounds that they are either always peaceful or always violent
 
All I'm asking for is a picture of a destroyed LA, the one you said was destroyed. If you can't show me the picture you claim happened, there's no hope for you. Prove what you post is accurate.
What part of "exaggeration" confuses you?
[/QUOTE]
Where's the picture of LA in ashes?
 
No, it is the more serious version of insurrection.

How many people in LA were being violent? Based on your comment, you have a number.

Then why don’t they call it an insurrection and add additional penalties? Because it’s not an insurrection.
 
We are talking about the current LA situation, not ancient history.

Ahaha! 1992 is now ancient history? Lordy, you guys keep on bringing up slavery from 400 years ago. Ridiculous.
 
What part of "exaggeration" confuses you?
Where's the picture of LA in ashes?
[/QUOTE]
they're hidden behind a screen that requires an IQ greater than a dacshound to view
 
I'm not surprised you don't know. But supporting a country's leader to use their military against their own citizens, is fascist.

The military has been used multiple times in America to quell riots.
 
Back
Top Bottom